Bruce Fein, a former U.S. Deputy Associate Attorney General and currently Counsel for a US Tamil group said in an interview mid December that a 400+ page model indictment charging Sri Lanka officials for genocide against Tamils will be ready to be submitted to the U.S. Justice Department first week of January.
He added that the document describes the motivational context, catalogues crimes, and constructs legal arguments establishing culpability of a U.S. citizen and a US greencard holder for the crime of genocide against Tamils in Sri Lanka under the U.S. Genocide Accountability Act (18 U.S.C. 1091).
Fein is currently counsel for Tamils Against Genocide, a
TamilNet: Can you describe the legal process your group has chosen to bring Sarath Fonseka and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa to justice in US courts?
Fein: The United States Genocide Accountability Act of 2007 (GAA) makes Fonseka and Gotabhaya Rajapaksa subject to a genocide prosecution in United States courts even though the genocidal acts against Tamils occurred in Sri Lanka.
The
TAG [Tamils Against Genocide] has virtually completed a model federal grand jury indictment of Fonseka and Rajapaksa charging violations of the GAA. The facts demonstrating genocide have been compiled from TAG’s independent research and investigations. The two were selected as defendants in lieu of President Mahinda Rajapaksa because Gotabhaya Rajapakse is a
The model indictment will be presented to the new United States Attorney General appointed by President Obama and the new Secretary of State. The two appointees hold the keys to a genocide prosecution, which only the government can initiate.
TamilNet: Do
Fein: The model indictment describes the culture of genocide in
The indictment then collects three categories of genocidal acts intended to destroy Tamil groups in whole or in part in various villages or municipalities in the northeast based on ethnicity or religion: extra-judicial killings, including disappearances; serious bodily injury; and, creating conditions of life intended to cause the physical destruction of Tamil groups, for example, starvation, malnutrition, impaired medical care or medicines, never-ending physical, economic, or physical insecurity, massive and repeated internal displacements, or Sinhalese Buddhist colonization.
The genocidal acts TAG has chronicled in the draft indictment surpasses by far the genocidal evidence in the charges against former Bosnian leader Radovan Karadzic.
TamilNet: In the
Fein: TAG will seek to enlist the support of Members of the House and Senate to champion the genocide indictment with the Attorney General and Secretary of State through letters, confirmation hearings, and otherwise. TAG will also seek congressional hearings on the ongoing Sri Lankan genocide. It will also publish articles and meet with editorial boards of newspapers to rally public
TamilNet: Is the international climate conducive for your legal action, and do you think Obama administration with Eric Holder as the new attorney general will be inclined to support this effort?
Fein: The genocide of
Further, the New York-based Genocide Prevention Project has included
TamilNet: Besides the U.S.Group, who else is supporting your legal action?
Fein: TAG has received support from
TamilNet: Are you pursuing any other legal avenues, and if so, can you elaborate?
Fein: The Torture Victims Protection Act (TVPA) authorizes any person or their legal representatives to bring a civil suit for damages against any other person complicity in their extra-judicial killing or torture under color of foreign law wherever the wrongdoing occurs. The advantage of a civil suit is that the initiative does not require the approval or support of the
TamilNet: What is your response to the note on the Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP) website by the Sri Lankan Secretary General Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha on the model genocide indictment against
Fein:
On December 15, 2008, Professor Rajiva Wijesinha, Secretary General, Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process, an echo chamber instrumentality of the Government of Sri Lanka, sallied forth on his website (www.peaceinsrilanka.org) with an awesome arsenal of irrelevancies and non sequiturs to confute my model genocide indictment.
The Professor’s sophistry builds on the casuistry taught to every first year law student: If the law is against you, argue the facts; if the facts are against you, argue the law; and, if the law and the facts are against you, confuse the issue. Accordingly, Professor Wijesinha’s delivers an indictment against the LTTE as a purported defense to the Rajapaksa-Fonseka genocides. The genocide prosecution sought against Sudanese President Omar Bashir has rejected such a defense theory to a charge of genocide. In addressing the model genocide indictment I have prepared, this is what Professor Wijesinha adduces to persuade the reader to return a verdict of not guilty: not a single word or fact.
Indeed, the Professor never denies the Rajapaksa-Fonseka genocides. He simply bloviates: “Fein may see himself as an expert in pressing the right buttons, but [Tamils Against Genocide] should rethink squandering its funds on such characters.”
I challenge Professor Wijesinha or any official in the Government of Sri Lanka to debate me over the model genocide indictment at any time and in any venue of his or their choosing, including