A piece in The Economist examines the military’s role in Sri Lanka.
See extracts below, for full article click here.
JOSEPH STALIN is unhappy. The boss of a Sri Lankan teachers’ union claims that the country’s schools are losing their independence. Last month, unions say, nearly 4,000 headteachers were invited to interviews at the National Cadet Corps. Successful applicants will get 45 days of training, and then full military titles. The idea, supposedly, is to improve discipline in schools.
The army’s grip is spreading across Sri Lankan society. Activists talk of a general effort to promote military culture among the young, especially among the ethnic Sinhalese majority.
Elsewhere soldiers fix roads and bridges, put up and renovate houses, remodel cities and even grow and sell vegetables. The army has a brand of hotels, Laya. Not to be outdone, in September the navy launched its own resort called Sober Island (rum, or at least alcohol, served). The navy has also taken to dredging canals and running boat services. Meanwhile, the air force offers helicopter tours and even a beauty salon, “Airforce Clippers”, in Colombo, handy for bridal dressing, sari draping and possibly a crew-cut.
Behind all this is the defence secretary, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, who also holds the portfolio of urban development. This month his elder brother, President Mahinda Rajapaksa, officially opened a two-storey banqueting hall on the edge of a lagoon, built by the air force.
Sceptics say all this kind of stuff should be curbed. In the north and east, where the Tamil minority bore the brunt of war, the presence of military men breeds worry. No good reason exists for them to breed crocodiles, run school seminars, conduct whale-watching tours, or operate nurseries.
Yet activists fear that a chief reason for spreading military influence is indoctrination. “Leadership training” for university entrants is now run by the army inside military camps, for example. The other Stalin would have applauded.
