Widespread outrage as China and Russia veto Syria resolution

Russia and China have vetoed a UN Security Council resolution to impose sanctions on Syria, creating frustration among the remaining states.

Special Envoy for Syria, Kofi Annan’s spokesman Ahmad Fawzi had said that Annan had expressed disappointment over the world powers, for failing to reach a consensus on the issue and added that "[Annan] believes that the voice of the Council is much more powerful when its members act as one."

French ambassador to the UN, Gerard Araud had said:

"It is now clear that Russia merely wants to win time for the Syrian regime to smash the opposition,"

The White House has criticised the “highly unfortunate” vetoes with spokesman Jay Carney saying:

"[China and Russia] are on the wrong side of the Syrian people, the wrong side of hope for peace and stability in the region,"

 "It was a highly regrettable decision."

In a statement on Thursday morning, British foreign secretary William Hague had said:

“[The resolution] was not a Western proposition. It was what people in governments all over the world wanted to see, and there was nothing in it that would have authorised military action.”

“So the decision by Russia and China, in the view of the United Kingdom, to veto this resolution is inexcusable and indefensible. When it came to the time to turn agreements, which they have supported, into action to end the violence, they stood aside from that. They have turned their back on the people of Syria in their darkest hour.”

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.

Restricted HTML

  • You can align images (data-align="center"), but also videos, blockquotes, and so on.
  • You can caption images (data-caption="Text"), but also videos, blockquotes, and so on.
  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.
  • You can embed media items (using the <drupal-media> tag).

We need your support

Sri Lanka is one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a journalist. Tamil journalists are particularly at threat, with at least 41 media workers known to have been killed by the Sri Lankan state or its paramilitaries during and after the armed conflict.

Despite the risks, our team on the ground remain committed to providing detailed and accurate reporting of developments in the Tamil homeland, across the island and around the world, as well as providing expert analysis and insight from the Tamil point of view

We need your support in keeping our journalism going. Support our work today.

link button