• British banks invest in cluster bomb manufacturers

    An investigation by the UK newspaper, the Independent, revealed yesterday that British banks continue to invest in companies that manufacture cluster bombs.

    The Royal Bank of Scotland, 83% owned by the tax-payer, reportedly invested over $190 million into two companies alleged to be making cluster munitions – Alliant Techsystems and Lockhead Martin.

    HSBC, Barclays and Lloyds TSB are also reported to have made investments into similar companies. Although the banks have subsequently refuted such claims, anti-arms charities have pointed out that the companies concerned are yet to publicly deny the manufacturing of cluster bombs.

    Britain has signed up to the Convention on Cluster Munitions, effectively banning cluster bombs. However the banks utilise a legal loop hole that permits investment in companies that manufacture cluster bombs, provided there is no direct investment into the bombs.

    Anti-arms charities and Amnesty International have severely condemned such investments and called on the coalition government to close the loophole. This would bring the UK in line with Belgium, Ireland, Luxemburg and New Zealand who have banned the direct or indirect financing of cluster bombs.

    Today, the Independent revealed that despite such calls, the government remains in favour of self-regulation.

    A spokesperson for No 10 was quoted as saying, "The issue of indirect financing is for individual institutions to consider. We as a government have made it very clear that direct financing of cluster munitions is illegal. We would encourage NGOs to come together and engage with the banks to find a mutually agreeable approach to indirect financing.”

    Cluster bombs, notorious for their indiscriminate destruction,  have been employed by the Sri Lankan government over Tamil civilian areas on multiple occasions.

    In February 2009, Gordon Weiss, UN spokesperson at the time, condemned a cluster bomb attack on a hospital in Puthukkudiyiruppu. Fifty-two civilians were killed and 80 wounded.

    The UN later refuted Sri Lanka’s use of cluster bombs.

    Much in the same way it claimed only 8000 civilians were killed, before its own panel of experts supported Gordon Weiss’ estimated death toll of 40,000 Tamil civilians. 

  • The potential of America's 'Atrocities Prevention Board'

    Welcoming the Obama administration’s launch of a new inter-agency body – the Atrocities Prevention Board – and other measures to enhance US responsiveness to the threat of mass atrocities and genocide, the Council on Foreign Relations this week put forward an analysis of its key benefits, as well as potential obstacles to the new doctrine.

    The Council on Foreign Relations is one of the most influential foreign policy think-tanks in the US.

    “These are commendable - arguably overdue - initiatives,” the CFR said of the Presidential Study Directive (PSD-10) authorizing the new initiatives.

    “[In the past] the US response to the threat of mass atrocities and genocide often has been too little, too late, and too improvised. Senior policymakers frequently have been unaware or distracted by other events when atrocities break out.”

    “Once the magnitude of the threat becomes apparent, the range of practical responses has often narrowed and the potential costs of action rises to unpalatable levels. Generating the political will to act then becomes that much more difficult. The result is typically a muddled, ad hoc set of responses designed to contain the consequences with minimum commitment.”

    These are extracts from the CFR's research note (for full text see here):

    Benefits of PSD-10:

    First, by explicitly making the prevention of atrocities and genocide a presidential priority, PSD-10 provides a high-level sanction for the U.S. military and civilian agencies to plan and prepare for this mission.

    Second, the directive also calls for the intelligence community to improve its support for atrocity-prevention efforts. Predicting the outbreak of atrocities with a high degree of confidence is no doubt a difficult task, but scholars have in recent years improved our understanding of telltale risk factors, such as leadership instability and ethnic polarization.

    But without a high-level body of policymakers to receive such early warning information, it is effectively worthless. The new Atrocities Prevention Board, augmented by the recently created National Security Staff directorate for atrocities and war crimes, could serve as that body--one potentially empowered to push for proactive responses.

    Third, the directive's goal of producing a comprehensive policy framework could expand the range of early response options - particularly non-military ones - available to senior U.S. officials. It avoids the false choice of "sending in the Marines or doing nothing" that has often stymied early action in the past.

    The U.S. government already holds a number of diplomatic, economic, and legal tools that can help halt or reverse escalating threats.

    Tough Questions:

    First, will the new atrocity-prevention structures and processes become "mainstreamed" within the national security apparatus? Recent history demonstrates that the established bureaucracy can marginalize or eliminate good faith efforts to change the status quo.

    Second, will the elevated priority given to atrocity prevention continue with subsequent administrations? In the wake of the Rwanda debacle, the Clinton administration established the Atrocity Prevention Inter-Agency Working Group in 1998 only to have it disappear when Bush took office two years later. Other similar initiatives have fallen by the wayside as new administrations desire to distance or distinguish themselves from their predecessors.

    Third, and most importantly, will the American people support what some will doubtless see as altruistic efforts with little bearing on U.S. interests? As the United States' fiscal position worsens and calls for strategic retrenchment intensify, such sentiments are sure to increase.

    And no post-Cold War president has ever ordered a large-scale military intervention to stop atrocities without significant public support.

    This possibility only makes institutionalizing the preventive measures resulting from PSD-10 all the more important.

  • UN calls for probe into Sudanese war crimes
    The UN yesterday called for an independent and through inquiry into allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Sudan, weeks before the country was divided into two independent nations.

    The preliminary 12-page report (see
    here) issued by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights detailed incidents of “extrajudicial killings, arbitrary arrests and illegal detention, enforced disappearances, attacks against civilians, looting of civilian homes and destruction of property”.

    Focussing on events between June 5th and 30th, the report went on to say "If substantiated (the allegations) could amount to
    crimes against humanity, or war crimes for which individual criminal responsibility may be sought".

    UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay
    said
    “This is a preliminary report produced under very challenging circumstances and with very limited access to affected areas... However what it suggests has been happening in Southern Kordofan is so serious that it is essential there is an independent, thorough and objective inquiry with the aim of holding perpetrators to account.”

    The report detailed how the Sudanese Air Force (SAF) “regularly conducted aerial bombardments in the Nuba Mountains and in several towns and villages populated by the Nuba. The aerial bombardments have resulted in significant loss of life, destruction of properties, and massive displacement.”

    Written in conjunction with the UN Mission in Sudan, the report also contains allegations the use of chemical weapons, widespread looting by armed militias, interference with medical and humanitarian assistance, as well as the existence of several mass graves.


    “These flagrant and repeated violations of international conventions as well as specific agreements with the Government of Sudan concerning the privileges and immunities under which the UN operates are an extremely serious matter which cannot be left unresolved or unpunished,” said the High Commissioner.


    Southern Kordofan is situated in Sudan, but borders the newly independent state of South Sudan. Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court on charges of war crimes and genocide in Sudan's Darfur region.
  • United Nations: weak leaders wanted

    Extracts from the editorial of The Guardian (see full article here):

    The myopia of powerful governments is clearly shown in their preference for weak candidates for UN secretary-general. Occasionally they misjudge their man, with interesting results. With Dag Hammarskjöld, it was peacekeeping. Kofi Annan's staff devised the millennium development goals. This time – with the quiet reappointment of secretary-general Ban Ki-moon this summer – they got what they wanted. Mr Ban presides over the slow decay of the UN secretariat, an institution that should be working, as Hammarskjöld said, on the edge of progress. In its last annual report, Human Rights Watch wrote "far from condemning repression, Ban sometimes went out of his way to portray oppressive governments in a positive light". China, Burma, Sri Lanka have benefited from Mr Ban's lax hand. To save his legacy he must refresh his top team with people who understand the UN's principles.

    In Washington, the flame of Roosevelt and Truman burns low. Barack Obama and his UN ambassador Susan Rice are too aware of the Republican opposition at home to make a powerful case for the UN. But Mr Obama seeks retrenchment, and an effective UN would help him achieve it. The emerging powers are jealous of their sovereignty and ambivalent about human rights. The challenge is to bind these powers into a progressive security council. Take Libya. Britain, America and France should never again elide the responsibility to protect populations with regime change. Brazil and India, among others, must also recognise that when a ruler declares war on his own people he forfeits sovereignty.

  • US search for Korean War dead continues

    Almost 60 years after an armistice ended the Korean war, the United States has resumed its efforts to bring home the remains of more than 2000 American soldiers.

    The US has written to North Korea on the matter, the Pentagon said.

    Despite the complete absence of diplomatic ties and particularly frosty ties over recent attacks on South Korea, the US has long sought cooperation with North Korea over the repatriation of soldiers’ remains.

    North Korea has reportedly received several millions of dollars in exchange for cooperation.

    Speaking at this year’s Korean War Armistice Day, war veteran and Democratic congressman, Charles Rangal, called upon Americans to remember the fallen.

    "As we pay tribute to the nearly two million Americans who answered the call to defend the freedom of Korea, we should not forget about those who never returned” he said.

    North Korea returned 208 sets of remains during the early ‘90s, however, American forensic experts were unable to identify most.

    Following further negotiations, American experts were later allowed into North Korea in order to conduct a more precise retrieval process, yielding more than 220 sets of remains – eighty of which were identified and returned to the families concerned.

    Operations ceased six years ago however, after the United States raised concerns over the safety of its workers.

  • The myth of sports and repressive regimes

    David Clay Large, professor of history at Montana State University, writes in the New York Times (see full article here):

    Few Olympics are as famous as the 1936 Berlin Games, whose 75th anniversary falls this month. The publicity that accompanied the competition, held under the watchful eye of Adolf Hitler, supposedly tamed the Nazi regime.

    But much of that story is myth. Indeed, the Olympics gave the Nazis a lesson in how to hide their vicious racism and anti-Semitism, and should offer today’s International Olympic Committee a cautionary tale when considering the location of future events.

    When the committee awarded the Olympics to Berlin in 1931 … committee soon came under pressure from Jewish and leftist groups, which threatened to boycott the Games.

    The committee held firm, but promised that the Games would 'open up' the Third Reich, that international attention would force it to tone down its repressive measures.

    While it’s clear that the Games failed to “open up” the Third Reich, it remains widely believed that, to placate visitors, Hitler’s government cut back its persecution of Jews during the summer [of 1936]  — in other words, that the Games achieved some of what the committee promised.

    But the truth is more nuanced. Although the regime did discourage open anti-Semitism, this directive pertained only to Berlin. Outside the capital, the Nuremberg Laws remained in full effect.

    The Games were even counterproductive in this respect: not only did such cosmetic steps assuage criticism of the Nazis, but they taught the regime how easy it was to mislead the global public.

    This is not to say that the Games should be held only in politically ‘clean’ countries.

    But instead of blindly celebrating the alleged openness of repressive regimes that host the event, the international community should use it as an opportunity to hold them to the values that [the Games] claim to represent.

  • Israel to extradite citizen over Srebrenica genocide
    A court in Jerusalem has ruled that an Israeli citizen who took part in Srebrenica massacre of 1995, be extradited to Bosnia to face charges of genocide.

    The AFP reported that Aleksandar Cvetkovic, a Bosnian Serb who obtained Israeli citizenship through his Jewish wife, is accused of "involvement in the offence of genocide during the massacre carried out in 1995 at Branjevo farm in the vicinity of the town of Srebrenica."

    The massacre, which was the worst on European soil since World War Two, involved the execution of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys by Serbian troops.

    After his arrest in January, the state prosecutor's office called the extradition process, part of "an international legal action that investigates and prosecutes those responsible for planning and carrying out genocide."

    According to evidence in the Israeli prosecutors' extradition request: "The victims were brought by buses to the execution site, some blindfolded with their hands tied, stood up in rows and shot by the soldiers, using automatic rifles, heavy machines guns and pistols."

    Cvetkovic was part of the firing squad and allegedly said "that this execution is proceeding slowly and that they should also start to use the M-84 machinegun".

    He is to be extradited to a court in the Bosnian capital of Sarajevo, which was set up in 2005 to assist the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia based in The Hague. Both courts have sentenced dozens of Bosnian Serbs for charges of war crimes and genocide.

    Amongst those currently on trial are former Bosnian Serb military commander Ratko Mladic and Bosnian Serb wartime political leader Radovan Karadzic. The final Serbian war crimes fugitive, Goran Hadzic, was arrested earlier this year.

    The massacre at Srebrenica became a symbol for the breakup of Yugoslavia, once a multi-ethnic state, into several independent countries.
  • The unspeakable truth about Israel’s social crisis
    As mass demonstrations, marches and occupations of public spaces extend into a third week, Israel is seeing the rise of a new social movement.

    In recent weeks hundreds of thousands have been marching in cities throughout Israel, demanding action against the sharply rising cost of housing.

    Since mid-July, growing numbers of Israelis have been taking to the streets, outraged at the rapid increase in Israel’s property prices over the past few years.

    The protests have become the largest in the country’s history.

    However, amid the popular support from the Israeli people, discussion of a key issue underpinning it has been avoided: Israel’s massive state funding for settlement in the Palestinian territories.

    The protests began on July 14 when students set up a small collection of tents at the exclusive Rothschild Boulevard in Tel Aviv. Since then thousands of ‘tent cities’ have sprouted across the country.

    The symbolism is powerful. It was at 16, Rothschild Boulevard that David Ben-Gurion proclaimed the Israeli state in May 1948.

    The key issue behind the mass protest is Israel’s housing crisis, marked by spiralling rent and property prices.

    While Israel’s economy has largely avoided the global recession, with 20-year low unemployment and positive growth, the cost of living has been steadily increasing.

    Dimi Reider and Aziz Abu Sarah explain why in their op-ed in the New York Times:

    "So far, the protesters have managed to remain apolitical, refusing to declare support for any leader or to be hijacked by any political party.

    But there is one issue conspicuously missing from the protests: Israel’s 44-year occupation of the Palestinian territories, which exacts a heavy price on the state budget and is directly related to the lack of affordable housing within Israel proper.

    According to a report published by the activist group Peace Now, the Israeli government is using over 15 percent of its public construction budget to expand West Bank settlements, which house only 4 percent of Israeli citizens. According to the Adva Center, a research institute, Israel spends twice as much on a settlement resident as it spends on other Israelis.

    Indeed, much of the lack of affordable housing in Israeli cities can be traced back to the 1990s, when the availability of public housing in Israel was severely curtailed while subsidies in the settlements increased, driving many lower-middle-class and working-class Israelis into the West Bank and Gaza Strip — along with many new immigrants.

    Israel today is facing the consequences of a policy that favors sustaining the occupation and expanding settlements over protecting the interests of the broader population. The annual cost of maintaining control over Palestinian land is estimated at over $700 million.

    Had the protesters begun by hoisting signs against the occupation, they would most likely still be just a few people in tents. By removing the single most divisive issue in Israeli politics, the protesters have created a safe space for Israelis of all ethnic, national and class identities to act together.

    And by decidedly placing the occupation outside of the debate, the protesters have neutralized much of the fear-mongering traditionally employed in Israel to silence discussions of social issues."

    Since 1957 the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza has cost more than $50 billion, to the detriment of Israel’s other sectors.

    According to Peace Now this is set to continue, with the government having to spend at least $570 million per year on subsidies for settlers. This includes both low-interest mortgages for settlers as well as discounts of up to 70% on land prices.

    Currently the protests enjoy the popular support of the people, with polls showing 88% of Israelis endorsing the movement, something that would have been near impossible to achieve if the issue of expenditure on settlements is taken up directly. A protest endorsing Palestinian statehood last month didn’t even manage to draw a fraction of this support.

    "The people who are running the protest movement right now are trying to be universal, in the sense of including all citizens of Israel," said Shlomo Swirski, the academic director at the Adva Center.

    However, as Reider and Abu Sarah, point out:

    “Even as they call for the strengthening of Israel’s once-robust welfare state, the protesters are disregarding the fact that it is alive and well in the West Bank.

    Although some of their demands can be met without addressing the settlements (like heavier taxes on landlords’ rental income to discourage rent increases), Israel will never become the progressive social democracy the protesters envision until it sheds the moral stain and economic burden of the occupation.”
  • Pakistan prosecutes its paramilitary soldiers for extrajudicial killing

    A Pakistan court prosecuted six paramilitary soldiers and one civilian security guard for the shooting of an unarmed teenager in Karachi two months ago.

    A video of the killing, recorded by a local cameraman,  showed the young boy begging for mercy, before being shot, twice.

    The video was widely broadcast across television channels and internet sites.

    The killing was severely condemned by human rights groups and politicians, whipping up public outrage at the incident.
     
    President Asif Ali Zardari swiftly launched an inquiry into the incident. The defendants were brought to the courts and tried in just over two months. The soldier who perpetrated the crimes received the death penalty, whilst remaining defendants received life sentences.

    The troops were part of a unit of Rangers – a paramilitary force deployed to maintain order in Karachi.

    Whilst denouncing the death sentence issued, Human Rights Watch welcomed the swift delivery of accountability and justice.

    “The verdict should go some way in arresting the impunity for abuses by Pakistan’s trigger-happy security and paramilitary agencies,” said Ali Dayan Hasan, Pakistan director at Human Rights Watch.

     “There is no greater deterrent to abuse than fear of accountability.”

  • US Senators urge Clinton to act on Burma rapes
    Thirteen female US Senators have written to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, urging her to take action against Burma’s military-backed regime for its alleged use of rape by government troops.

    "Given the Burmese regime's unabated use of rape as a weapon of war, we urge you to call on the regime to end this practice and pursue our shared goal of establishing an international commission of inquiry into war crimes and crimes against humanity," the group wrote in a letter to Clinton.

    The letter went on to cite Noble Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, who said that
    “rape is used as a weapon by (the) armed forces to intimidate the ethnic nationalities”.

    The cross party call for an international inquiry was led by Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein and senior Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson.

    The full text of the letter, obtained by Foreign Policy can be read here.

    Whilst chairing a UN Security Council meeting on violence against women in 2009, Clinton named both Burma and Sri Lanka as countries where rape was used as a “tactic of war”, much to the ire of the Sri Lankan government.
  • Communist China?

    So much for China’s communism.

    The editorial by Xinhua, China’s official news agency, in response to the downgrading of the United States’ debt rating reads like a neoliberal manifesto.

    Extracts:

    “The days when the debt-ridden Uncle Sam could leisurely squander unlimited overseas borrowing appeared to be numbered.

    “China, the largest creditor of the world's sole superpower, has every right now to demand the United States to address its structural debt problems

    “To cure its addiction to debts, the United States has to reestablish the common sense principle that one should live within its means.

    “Thus, if no substantial cuts were made to the US gigantic military expenditure and bloated social welfare costs, [this] downgrade would prove to be only a prelude to more devastating rating cuts, which will further roil the global financial markets all along the way.

    “Moreover, the spluttering world economic recovery would be very likely to be undermined and fresh rounds of financial turmoil could come back to haunt us all.

    The US has to come to terms with the painful fact that the good old days when it could just borrow its way out of messes of its own making are finally gone.

    It should also stop its old practice of letting its domestic electoral politics take the global economy hostage and rely[ing] on the deep pockets of major surplus countries to make up for its perennial deficits.

    A little self-discipline would not be too uncomfortable for the United States, the world's largest economy and issuer of international reserve currency, to bear.”
     

  • Iraqi parliament recognises past persecution of Kurds as genocide

    Extracts from niqash.org (see the full text here):

    "At the beginning of this month the Iraqi parliament voted to recognize what had been done to the Fayli Kurds under former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein as genocide. From 1980 onwards, the ethnic minority was horribly persecuted by Hussein’s regime.

    The Fayli Kurds, who are an ethnic subgroup of Kurds and mostly Shiite Muslims, were subjected to all kinds of hardships under Hussein’s Sunni Muslim dominated government: imprisonment, torture, rape and deportation among them.

    The recognition that genocide was committed has given the Fayli Kurds hope that they might be compensated for property which was confiscated from them and that they might regain their citizenship." The Fayli Kurds are among several minorities persecuted by Hussein’s regime and they often claim they are the forgotten victims, the last to receive justice."

  • Nokia Siemens' Chennai facility to become biggest in Asia

    Nokia Siemens Networks, one of the biggest telecommunications companies in the world, is to expand its manufacturing facility in Chennai, making it the firm’s biggest in Asia.

    NSN’s head of operations, Herbert Merz, said the factory in China is currently the company's largest in Asia, but the Chennai facility could overtake it in a year.

    The Chennai facility has played a key role in enabling Indian operators to roll out their 3G networks quickly, Ashish Chowdhary, head of India and customer operations East said.

    "The expansion will strengthen India's position as one of our major manufacturing hubs in the Asia Pacific, in addition to supporting the growth of India's growing telecom sector," he added.

    "Last year, we have procured close to $300 million worth of equipments from the Indian suppliers,” he pointed out.

    NSN currently serves 10 major Indian telecom networks, as well as the defence sector, railways, and others.

    The site in Oragadam (Chennai) was commissioned in 2007, with NSN investing $70 million and creating 500 jobs, since expanding to 1250. 15% of the company's global work force is based in Chennai.

  • Obama launches Atrocities Prevention Board

    United States President Obama announced last week the creation of a new body which will coordinate a government approach to genocide and other mass atrocities.

    The Atrocities Prevention Board – whose exact authority, mandate, and structure will be under interagency review over the next months – will begin functioning within 120 days, according to the presidential directive announcing its creation.

    See reports by the New York Times and Christian Science Monitor.

    A senior White House official told the Times one reason Mr. Obama wanted to set up the Atrocities Prevention Board was to avoid a situation in which the president is presented with only two options to respond to a mass atrocity: intervening militarily or doing nothing.

    Governmental engagement on atrocities and genocide too often arrives too late, when opportunities for prevention or low-cost, low-risk action have been missed,” a White House statement on the directive said.

    “By the time these issues have commanded the attention of senior policy-makers, the menu of options has shrunk considerably and the costs of action have risen.”

    The US move has been welcomed by the UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. See UPI’s report here. 

  • Brazil, India and South Africa to send envoys to Syria

    Brazil, India and South Africa, which have blocked United Nations pressure on Syria’s government to end repression of protesters, will send envoys to Damascus to seek an end to the violence.

    See the report by Bloomberg here.

    The three emerging political and economic powers, which in 2003 formed the coalition known as IBSA, plan to send deputy foreign ministers on the mission.

    The three have combined to put off action on a US and European draft resolution condemning the Assad regime’s attacks on anti-government protesters.

    Western diplomats say that support from the three might dissuade China and Russia from vetoing it.

    The US, Britain, Colombia, France, Germany, Nigeria and Portugal were among council members calling for action.

    Activists, analysts and Syrian refugees say the uprising, which has caused a reported 2,000 deaths, will intensify during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which starts next week. The protesters are calling for democracy and civil rights in a country, ruled by the Assad family for four decades.

Subscribe to International Affairs

Business

Music

The website encountered an unexpected error. Try again later.