NorthEast

Taxonomy Color
red
  • New UN envoy amidst concern over detentions

    A senior political official of the United Nations arrived in Sri Lanka to amidst international concern over human rights violations committed by Sri Lanka during its war against the Tamil Tigers and the continued detention of tens of thousands of Tamils in barbed wired camps.

    "We are very concerned about the pace of progress," Pascoe said Monday, September 16 at the United Nations as he prepared to travel to Sri Lanka at the request of Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. News Service said.

    "The secretary-general was there (in Sri Lanka) and a series of commitments was made … including on the movement of people out of camps and including an eventual political process and some kind of accountability mechanism."

    Pascoe said he will raise the issue of resettling displaced Tamils in Sri Lankan camps on his visit to the island nation.

    About 300,000 Tamils, displaced from their homes during the Sri Lankan military's campaign against the Tamil Tigers, have been housed in camps with poor facilities since May when the military declared victory over the Tamil Tigers.

    “We are very concerned about the pace of progress,” Pascoe said. “We’re particularly concerned about the [refugees].”

    The United Nations, its agencies and other international groups have been critical of the Sri Lankan government's slow progress in resettling the displaced people who are reportedly facing a humanitarian crisis in the camps. Only a few thousand of them have returned to their homes.

    Sri Lanka says its plan to return refugees to their homes by December depends on the clearing of mines from former conflict zones and establishing security in the north. Rains last month flooded tents and caused temporary sewage systems to overflow in the camps, prompting calls from the U.S. and the UN for the swift release of the estimated 300,000 displaced people before the monsoon season begins in the next couple of months.

    The UN can ask Sri Lanka to speed up the process, “but we have to complete de-mining first in these areas,” U.L.M. Haldeen, secretary in the Ministry of Resettlement and Disaster Relief Services said, responding to UN calls.

    Pascoe said he also planned to discuss the continued detention of two U.N. staff members and the Sri Lanka's decision to expel U.N. children's agency spokesman James Elder. Pascoe plans to spend several days in Sri Lanka, visiting refugee camps and meeting Rajapakse.

  • India uses arrests and visa refusal to suppress support for Eelam

    Seventeen lawyers and approximately 50 students were arrested for protesting against Congress party’s support for the Sri Lankan state and its failure to protect Tamil civilians in the neighbouring island.

    The arrests came as All India Congress Committee (AICC) general secretary Rahul Gandhi, toured major cities in Tamil Nadu to rejuvenate the party at the grass-roots level in the state.

    On Wednesday September 10, approximately 50 law students were arrested in Madurai for demonstrating against Gandhi’s visit to Tamil Nadu.

    The students flayed Congress for being “indifferent” to the ‘sufferings’ of Sri Lankan Tamils and demanded the ban on LTTE to be lifted and India to recognise separate Tamil Eelam, police said.

    On Thursday September 10, the day Gandhi was scheduled to arrive in Coimbatore, 17 lawyers were arrested by the police for staging a black flag demonstration over the visit Gandhi to Tamil Nadu, accusing Congress of failing to protect the lives and property of Tamils in Sri Lanka.

    The lawyers, carrying black flags, shouted slogans such as 'Rahul Go Back' 'Do not enter Tamil Nadu,' near the District Court Complex.

    At a press meeting held at Chennai, Gandhi was cornered by the media on the Congress government's lack of response to the plight of Tamils lodged in camps in Sri Lanka, according to local media reports.

    Answering a flurry of questions that bordered on accusing the Congress of inaction despite large scale civilian deaths in the island nation, Rahul vehemently denied the charge and said he and his family had always stood for Tamils' rights and maintained that India would not tolerate any violation of their rights, according to reports.

    Frustrated at the unrelenting media, at one point, Gandhi was quoted as asking "What answer do you want?'' and adding "I want to make something very clear. My family has always had utmost admiration and respect for Tamil people. My grandmother and my father were involved in this. We've deep sentiments for Tamil people''.

    “The government and the Prime Minister would not tolerate anything other than this.”

    “The central government is applying as much pressure as possible on the Sri Lankan government. Congress wants the rights of the Tamils guaranteed. There is absolutely no question about it. We will do everything to protect them,'' he was further quoted as saying.

    However, Gandhi did not make any specific comments on the internment of 300,000 internally displaced Tamils in camps.

    However, responding to Gandhi’s comments Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK) leader V Gopalswamy (Vaiko) said that Gandhi was ignorant of the plight of Tamils and his assurance has come too late for Tamil refugees.

    "Rahul Gandhi stated that the Indian Government would not let down the Tamils. Already the Indian government has enabled them (Government of Sri Lanka) to disseminate (divide and isolate) the Tamils. So, Rahul Gandhi, I pity him for his ignorance," Vaiko said.

    Meanwhile, the Indian embassy in New York denied a visa to US-based humanitarian worker and a critic of the Sri Lanka Government, Dr Ellyn Shander to travel to New Delhi to address the Delhi Tamil Sangam on 20th September, Deccan Chronicle reported.

    Shander was to address the Delhi meeting with MDMK General Secretary Vaiko, after attending meeting in Bangalore with the local Tamil Sangam on 15th of September.

    "Her [Shander's] Indian host M.Natarajan, Chennai-based political activist and husband of Sasikala, close friend of AIADMK leader Jayalalithaa Jeyaram, has accused both the Central and state governments of curbing free speech in the country," the paper said.

    Natarajan has organised a series of meetings in Chennai, Bangalore, Coimbatore, Madurai and Delhi till Sept. 20 with Shander as the main speaker, the paper added.

    Natarajan said that the Chennai police had denied permission to conduct an indoor meeting with Shander as the guest on September 16. “We have moved the Madras high court against denial of permission to conduct indoor meetings on the human rights violations in Sri Lanka. The writ petition would be heard on Monday,” the paper said quoting Natarajan.

    Shander told TamilNet that she will protest against the visa cancellation.

    "My only hope and desire is to see the Tamils of Sri Lanka liberated from the hell of the concentration camps. They are being brutalized, killed, raped and deprived of even basic human rights, by their own government, all because they were born Tamil in Sri Lanka," Shander told TamilNet, adding, "The Indian government has the ability to be a shining example of humanitarianism and save the Tamils of Sri Lanka. India will then go down, on the right side of history."

    Shander, a Connecticut physician, worked with the Elie Wiesel Foundation to obtain a statement from the nobel laureate, Elie Wiesel supporting Tamils right to "live and flourish in t Sri Lanka, according to local2F>





  • US bemoans Sri Lanka inaction on camps, reconciliation
    The United States State Department is preparing a report on war crimes committed by Sri Lanka to be presented to the US Congress next week, local media in Colombo reported quoting US Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes Issues Stephen Rapp.
    Stephen Rapp, US's ambassdor at large for War Crimes Issues (WCI) told Time magazine that his office is responsible "to collect information on ongoing atrocities... [and] give a signal [when] something serious is occuring."
    “There are situations that have already been handed to us. There is a report from the Department of State on the war in Sri Lanka due in Congress on September 21. Additionally the office, together with the Secretary for Global Affairs and the Secretary of State, has the responsibility to collect information on ongoing atrocities and it is then the responsibility of the President to determine what steps might be taken towards justice. Like the canary in the coalmine, we give the signal that something very serious is occurring,” Rapp was quoted as in a response to a question posed by the Time magazine.
    With United Nations remaining impotent to act carry out investigations into the conduct of Sri Lanka military during the last several months of the war, the report to be released by the United States State Department on September 21, remains, perhaps the last credible instrument in the hands of the West to begin to find the truth on the allegations of war-crimes by the Sri Lanka Government and the Liberation Tigers, a spokesperson for a US-based activist group said.
    Whilst rights groups and Tamils, inside and outside Sri Lanka, want an international probe into Sri Lanka’s actions, the Sri Lankan government wants the international community to ignore its human rights violations and mistreatment of refugees and, instead, help it rebuild after the end of the war.
    When Time asked Ambassador Rapp "if the requirements of peace get in the way of justice?" the Ambassador responded "I think we've learned that contrary to fears, holding people accountable for atrocities does not make the problem worse, it makes it better. When Milosevic was indicted for ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, people were convinced that they would never have peace and he would be worse than ever. Within a short time he was charged and jailed in his own country.

    "Justice is a necessary ingredient to the establishment of peace. There's always an argument that justifies doing nothing, but you can't defer it forever," Rapp said.

    In the amendment 1169 to H.R. 2346, an Act making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, U.S. Senators had earlier proposed to "prohibit certain forms of financial support to Sri Lanka," unless certification is made by the Secretary of State that "Sri Lanka has taken certain steps to address the humanitarian situation in areas affected by the conflict in Sri Lanka."

    The forthcoming war-crimes report from the US State Department is mandated by the above Act.

  • Aiding Repression
    Sanctions are a diplomatic tool for the international community to peaceably compel recalcitrant governments into conforming with accepted international norms. This is the basis on which a variety of sanctions have in the past been successfully applied to regimes in Libya, Zimbabwe and Apartheid South Africa amongst many others. The logic of sanctions is simple: economic isolation of a state compels its discomforted people to pressure their leadership to change its behaviour and adhere to sought after international principles.
     
    Thus, it is especially on ultra-nationalist leaderships that rely on popular support, like President Mahinda Rajapskse's government in Sri Lanka or former President Slobodan Milosevic's in Serbia, that sanctions can be most effective. Moreover, irrespective of questions of efficacy, as exemplified by the cases of Serbia and Saddam's Iraq, sanctions are the only means, short of the use of armed force, to compel states to adhere to internationally accepted codes of conduct.
     
    Amid Sri Lanka's unabashed defiance of international human rights and governance norms, the European Union, press reports this month suggest, is considering withdrawing the GSP+ subsidy for firms that import from there. This, according to Sri Lanka's supporters, should not happen as it will "hurt" 250,000 'Sri Lankans'. But that, surely, is the logic of sanctions. It is only when the majority Sinhalese who support President Rajapak-se's ultra-nationalist regime are compelled by economic hardship into bringing internal pressure to bear on it that international demands over human rights and political reconciliation, for example, will even draw lip service from it.
     
    There are two related factors inherent to economics in Sri Lanka. Firstly, the vast majority of people involved in the export-manufacture sector make up the Sinhala vote bank on which President Rajapakse's political fortunes, short of him imposing a militarized dictatorship, depend. Secondly, manufacturing is non-existent in the Tamil-speaking Northeast, which has been ravaged repeatedly by the thirty years of war. In other words, under these conditions, further foreign investment or subsidies in the southern (Sinhala-dominated) economy will not only further secure the Rajapakse regime and entrench the rampant chauvinism that has swept the country in the past three years it will fuel the ethnic polarization.
     
    Since 1977, foreign subsidies and investment have benefit the Sinhala only while structurally excluding the Tamils. This is as true of the major infrastructure projects supported by donors, as the majority of their 'poverty-alleviation' efforts. As forthcoming research from the University of London reveals, this is no outlandish claim, but self-evident from where - and how - donors have undertaken their efforts for thirty years.
     
    That most wealth is concentrated in Sri Lanka's Western province does not mean the rest of the Sinhala south and Tamil-speaking Northeast have been equally 'excluded'. On the one hand, there is the militarized repression under which Tamils have lived since liberalization began in 1977, the devastating firepower unleashed against Tamil towns and villages during the war and the proclivity of donors to simply ignore the Northeast whilst waiting for the government to win the war. On the other hand, there is the Sinhala dominance of the state, the flow of massive infrastructure development in Sinhala areas (for example Hambantota port), the political patron-client networks and the military remittances that have ensured the Sinhalese has been far better protected against economic hardship than the Tamils for the past few decades.
     
    This year, Sri Lanka has massacred tens of thousands of Tamils; 20,000 in the last weeks of the war against the Liberation Tigers. It continues, despite near daily international protest, to incarcerate hundreds of thousands of people, precisely because they are Tamils, while blocking international humanitarian and media access. For years, President Rajapakse's regime has murdered, 'disappeared', and tortured with complete impunity. Indeed, it has thumbed its nose at the international community, daring it to do its worst.
     
    Conversely, international inaction has allowed the regime to project itself internally as successfully standing up to the international community. Popular support, thus bolstered, has in turn fuelled chauvinism and repression. The international community can thus support the Sinhala state and hope for lasting peace or it can act to constrain Sinhala chauvinism and bring about one. Meanwhile, as more than one international observer has realized, Sri Lanka is in inexorable transition - between one war and another.
  • Australia parliament hears of starvation, rape, killings, torture in Sri Lanka camps
    Noting that "hundreds of thousands of innocent Tamils displaced by the military offensive are living in camps in appalling conditions. Moreover, foreign media channels have reported horrifying evidence of the worst violations of human rights, including starvation, rape, killings and torture.

    International agencies are calling for full access to these camps in order to provide life-saving treatment and medical supplies and to allow free and independent media access," parliamentarian, John Murphy, appealed at the House of Representatives on Thursday, September 13, "to all governments of the world who have respect for human rights, the rule of law and free speech to join together and call on the government of Sri Lanka to right the wrongs forthwith."

    More excerpts from Murphy's address follow:

    "To date, the Sri Lankan government has arrogantly refused free media and humanitarian access to these camps. Why is the Sri Lankan government hiding from the truth? Surely providing unimpeded media and humanitarian access to these camps would provide a perfect opportunity for the Sri Lankan government to demonstrate that it is doing all it can to alleviate the suffering of the Tamil people. Clearly, the Sri Lankan government does not want the truth revealed.

    "I am horrified to learn that a Sri Lankan journalist, Mr J S Tissainayagam, was detained for five months without charge in 2008 and has since been convicted and sentenced by the Colombo High Court to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment...What an appalling assault on free speech by the Sri Lankan government. Australia, as a country that asserts the rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression, including views on all matters of public policy, the behaviour of the Sri Lankan government is in direct conflict with our values as well as those of other democratic nations and, as such, must be loudly and publicly condemned.

    "In a further assault on freedom of speech, an Australian United Nations official, Mr James Elder, was recently ordered by the Sri Lankan government to leave the country because of comments he made about the military offensive and its impact on innocent civilians. Mr James Elder is a spokesman for the United Nations Children’s Fund in Colombo and has made several statements on foreign television news channels and print media concerning the horrendous humanitarian crisis in Sri Lanka....It is obvious that there exists no freedom of the press in Sri Lanka. The actions of the government of Sri Lanka must be condemned and must be condemned loudly."
  • Sri Lanka hits out at reports of GSP+ withdrawal
    Sri Lankan officials have responded angrily to reports that the European Union may withdraw the GSP+ concessions that Sri Lanka is currently entitled to.

    “Western countries should remember that economic power has shifted from the west to the east,” said Palita Kohona, Sri Lanka’s new ambassador to the UN.

    “New markets open up in the east. Our friends China, India, Japan, Korea, Iran … a whole range of countries [can help]," he was quoted as saying.

    The comments followed increasing speculation that the GSP plus program, worth around £1 billion in trade concessions, would be cancelled for Sri Lanka.

    "Sri Lanka has enough friends around the world. You have to realise that financial resources and power is no longer concentrated in one part of the world” continued Kohona.

    "We can handle the loss" said the diplomat, who was also recently refused a visa by the British High Commission.

    Dayan Jayatilleka, who was until last month, Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva, disagreed with Kohona’s comments.

    “The cold hard fact is that we need GSP Plus far more than the EU needs to give it to us”, wrote Jayatilleka in a newspaper column.

    “It is not our right or entitlement; it is what it is: a concession... conditional upon certain things because we sought eligibility upon certain claims and obtained the concession in the first place upon those claims and promises.”

    “Frankly, if you are asking someone else for their money or preferential access to their markets, you cannot really demand it and get stroppy when it is not forthcoming,” Jayatilleka rounded off his column in The Sunday Times in Sri Lanka.

    Meanwhile, The Sunday Times reported that President Mahinda Rajapakse was angered by another Sri Lankan ministry’s comments that “GSP Plus is very unlikely.”

    Sri Lanka’s Trade Ministry released a statement admitting it was “very unlikely” that they would keep hold of the GSP Plus concessions, following a damning 130-page report by the European Union.

    S Rannugge, secretary in Sri Lanka`s Export Development and International Trade Ministry, told Reuters that the review highlighted human rights abuses and torture allegations carried out by the Sri Lankan Government.

    The Sri Lankan President has now intervened in the matter.

    At a meeting at Temple Trees, Rajapakse appointed a team of four ministers to make a strong plea for the concessions not be withdrawn. The team comprises Export Development and International Trade Minister G.L. Peiris, Disaster Management and Human Rights Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe, Justice Minister Milinda Moragoda and Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama.

    “All four must work as a team and give me results,” the President told ministers.

    A final decision is due in October.

  • Top Sri Lankan officials refused visa by UK
    To ire of Sri Lankan government, the British High Commission in Colombo has refused to issue visas to two top officials, according to media sources.
    Outgoing Foreign Secretary and Sri Lanka’s new permanent representative to the United Nations, Palitha Kohona and former Deputy Tourism Minister and ruling party parliamentarian Arjuna Ranatunge had submitted their passports to the British High Commission for visa to London but to their surprise the passports were returned without any valid reason for turning down their visa applications, according to Daily Mirror.

    Foreign Ministry’s Chief of Protocol, through whom Dr. Kohona’s passport was forwarded to the British High Commission, later sought an explanation for returning the passport but a High Commission official had reportedly told the Foreign Office that the Foreign Secretary should be personally present at the High Commission to obtain the visa.

    Foreign Ministry, however, had insisted that Dr. Kohona had no reason to be personally present at the High Commission to obtain the visa as he was the Foreign Secretary of the Country.

    Foreign Ministry had later again sought a visa to London for the Foreign Secretary, but the second attempt too was rejected by the High Commission saying there was not enough time to process the visa.

    Foreign Ministry officials, who insisted that the application was given with 24 hours notice, had made several attempts to contact the British High Commissioner and his Deputy to seek their intervention but they could not be contacted over the telephone, the government sources said.

    The government is of the view that the British High Commission had violated diplomatic protocols by rejecting a visa for the Foreign Secretary and parliamentarian Arjuna Ranatunge and felt this had further strained relations between Britain and Sri Lanka.

    Government sources said Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama was expected to summon the British High Commissioner Dr. Peter Hayes to seek an explanation over the visa rejection, particularly to the Foreign Secretary.

    The British High Commission in Sri Lanka responding through a press statement said whilst it expedite visa applications for senior political and official figures from Sri Lanka and other countries they do this in accordance with UK immigration rules and this means, for example, that they cannot issue free visas for personal visits.
    Acting High Commissioner Mark Gooding was quoted as saying: "The suggestion that there is any political bias in our visa application process is completely unfounded. We never comment on individual visa applications, but many of the details of the various cases reported are incorrect.”
    “In all cases of VIP visits, the High Commission works closely with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to try to ensure a smooth service, and we look forward to continuing this co-operation," the British Commission said.
    Earlier Attorney General Mohan Peiris was also inconvenienced by the British High Commission which asked him to appear in person for an interview to grant a visa.

  • UN officials expelled by Sri Lanka
    Chief of Communications for UNICEF in Sri Lanka, James Elder's visa to continue to remain in Sri Lanka was refused earlier this month by Sri Lanka's Department of Immigration without giving any reasons.

    News of Elder’s eviction was followed by news of another senior UN diplomat expelled from Sri Lanka in July for providing details to the international community of mass killings of civilians during the final battles against the Tamil Tigers, also emerged.

    It is widely believed that Elder is being expelled for recent remarks about the plight of refugees living in government-controlled camps in the north of the country.

    Elder called for aid groups to have unfettered access to the camps, to bring in medical aid and supplies.

    "It's important to remember these people have arrived in camps in the worst possible state," he said.

    "They are hungry and sick, and many still have untended wounds from the war." And added he’d seen “babies with shrapnel wounds, gunshot injuries and blast wounds” during Sri Lanka’s final push against the LTTE.

    Elder was also quoted in the media saying the about 270,000 displaced people were suffering hardship due to heavy flooding in the camps after heavy rain in some areas of Vavuniya district in recent weeks.

    However, Palitha Kohona, permanent secretary at the Sri Lankan ministry of foreign affairs, told the BBC Elder had issued statements "which were not exactly based on facts, which were not researched, which were essentially reflective of the LTTE [Tamil Tigers] perspective.

    "He was doing propaganda, in our view, in support of the LTTE," Kohona was quoted by BBC as saying.

    Kohona's comments have raised fears about the safety of Elder and his family in a country where ethnic tensions remain high just months after the end of a long-running civil war, reported the Age newspaper.
    According to the newspaper, Elder has received intimidating phone messages after it was announced that his visa would be cancelled on September 21.

    Even if the Sri Lankan Government reverses its decision to expel Elder, Kohona's comments appear to make his position in Sri Lanka untenable, the Age added.

    Elder, who holds an Australian passport, had been working for UNICEF in Sri Lanka since July 2008 and had a residency visa valid until 2010.
    Reacting to the news of Elders’ eviction, U.N. spokesman Farhan Haq told reporters: "The secretary-general strongly regrets the decision of the Sri Lankan government to expel Mr. James Elder, spokesman for UNICEF in Sri Lanka"

    ''The United Nations is working impartially to assist the people of Sri Lanka, and the Government should be supporting and co-operating with its efforts,'' Haq said adding UN Secreatry Genral Ban Ki Moon would raise the issue with Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse "at the earliest opportunity."

    The UNICEF reacting to Sri Lanka’s actions, in a statement said it was extremely 'concerned and disappointed' with the Sri Lankan government's decision.

    'Through Mr Elder, Unicef has consistently spoken out against the suffering of children on both sides of the intense hostilities earlier this year and called for their protection. Unicef unequivocally rejects any allegation of bias,' Unicef chief executive Ann Veneman said in a statement released in New York.

    'Unicef has always upheld the principle of impartial advocacy and communication on behalf of children as a fundamental part of its global mandate,' she said.

    'Unicef will continue to uphold its mandate in Sri Lanka, and elsewhere, to advocate and speak out on behalf of vulnerable children and women,' the statement added.

    Meanwhile, the Guardian newspaper in Britain Saturday, September 12, reported Peter Mackay, another Australian citizen, was given two weeks to leave the country in July this for providing detailed rebuttals of Sri Lankan government’s "wartime propaganda."

    The diplomat was seen as a legal timebomb by the Sri Lankan government as he could personally take the stand and testify that the army shelled non-combatants – action considered to be a war crime under international law, the paper said.

    “Mackay, a field operative who worked for Unops – the technical arm of the UN – was a less familiar face to the media. But he played a key role in keeping the outside world informed about the number of civilians killed in the final months of the war – deaths that Sri Lanka was keen to play down,” The Guardian reported.

    Mackay collected high-resolution satellite images showing that the number of people trapped on beaches where the Tigers made their last stand was far higher than that claimed by the government.

    The data showed that not only were more people in danger than the government admitted, but that the food and medicine sent to the "no fire zone" were inadequate.

    Mackay was also in touch with local staff and put together briefings, using eyewitness reports of the war, which led the UN to warn of a "bloodbath" in the final weeks of fighting.

    Mackay's experience and knowledge of LTTE-held territory made him the ideal UN candidate to record how the war was being fought, the paper said.

    “He was stranded behind Tamil Tiger lines on a mission to rescue 100 local staff and their families and was repeatedly bombed for 10 days in January, despite desperate calls to army commanders by his superiors imploring them to stop firing,” the paper reported.

    His presence, however, attracted the attention of Sri Lanka's military. In a letter sent in late July, the authorities gave him two weeks to pack up, saying that his "adverse activities had come to the notice of the intelligence services".

    A senior UN source confirmed that Mackay had been asked to leave, adding that "the issue was taken up through diplomatic channels with the government, but their decision remained unchanged".
    The visas of at least 10 foreign workers of non-governmental organisations have been cancelled or not extended over allegations of bias against the Tamil rebels.

  • Witness to Thileepan’s fast
    Thileepan, the young Tiger leader of Jaffna, took the podium on the 14th September 1987 at the Nallur Kandasamy temple to commence his fast- unto-death as a protest against India’s failure to fulfill her pledges, and to mobilise the frustrated sentiments of the Tamils into a national mass upsurgence.
     
    Thileepan’s non-violent struggle was unique and extraordinary for its commitment. Although an armed guerrilla fighter, he chose the spiritual mode of ‘ahimsa’ as enunciated by the great Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi to impress upon India the plight and predicament of the people of Tamil Eelam.
     
    The levels to which the Tamil people or more specifically, the LTTE cadres, are prepared to go for their freedom mirrors not only a deep passion for their liberation, but indicates the phenomenal degree of oppression they have been subjected to. It is only those who experience intolerable oppression of such a magnitude, of being threatened with extinction, that are capable of supreme forms of self sacrifice as we have seen from Thileepan’s episode.
     
    Thileepan, who had travelled to Delhi as part of LTTE leader Vellupillai Pirabakaran’s delegation before the signing of the Accord, was informed of the content of the dialogue that had taken place between the Indian Prime Minister and the LTTE leader.
     
    With the knowledge that there was an unwritten agreement between Indian Premier Rajiv Gandhi and Mr. Pirabakaran and that it had not been implemented, he felt that his people and the struggle had been betrayed and decided on a fast-unto-death demanding the fulfillment of the pledges.
     
    When news of Thileepan’s fast-unto-death and the deteriorating political situation between the LTTE and the Indian Peace Keeping Force reached us, we decided to leave India for Jaffna.
     
    My joy at reaching the shores of Tamil Eelam after so many years was contained by the gloom that hung in the air. Thileepan was a few days into his fast till death and the population of the Peninsula was seriously concerned and wholeheartedly behind the non-violent campaign of a single individual seeking justice from the world’s largest democracy. Subsequently, our first priority after our arrival in the Peninsula was to visit Thileepan encamped at the historic Nallur Kandasamy temple, the cultural and spiritual centre of the Jaffna Tamils.
     
    Thileepan’s decision to single-handedly take on the credibility of the Indian state was not incongruous with his history of resistance to state oppression as a cadre in the LTTE. He had faced battle on several occasions in defence of Jaffna during Kittu’s time and suffered serious abdominal wounds in the process. He was well known for his astute understanding of the politics and mindset of his people and emerged as a radical political leader.
     
    The senior LTTE women cadres often speak of his staunch advocacy of inducting women into the national struggle and is remembered as one of the founding fathers in the promotion of women’s issues. With such a history it comes as no surprise that he endeared himself not only to the cadres but the people of Jaffna also.
     
    My husband, LTTE theoretician Anton Balasingham, met Thileepan during the pre-Accord talks when he shared a hotel room with him in Delhi and quickly grew very fond of this affable fellow. It was an extremely painful and emotional experience for Bala to meet him again in Jaffna, in totally adverse conditions, with Thileepan’s life slowly ebbing away.
  • Le Monde calls for Sri Lanka to ‘stop’

    "After winning the war, the Sri Lankan regime is in the process of losing the peace. Following the historic, but bloody and distasteful victory, against the armed struggle of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa could be magnanimous and reach out to the Tamil minority and open the way for national reconciliation. But Rajapakse has chosen another path, the path of domination...Under the tents of the refugee camps tomorrow's Tigers may already be rising to mount a future rebellion," warned France's popular daily, Le Monde in an editorial last Thursday.

    Excerpts from the translated editorial follows:

    More than three months after the end of the war, some 280 000 Tamil refugees are kept as prisoners behind of barbed wire, unhealthy and overcrowded camps.

    Official reasons for the delay are that the Government is screening the civilians to identify combatants and to protect the village refugess from the mines planted by the LTTE.

    These excuses are fanciful. The truth is, the Sri Lankan government seeks to control this population [Tamil refugees] and to silence the refugees who were witnesses to the horror of the last weeks of the conflict.

    International assistance to camps will be forthcoming only if the Sri Lankan regime shows urgency in weeding out the suspects and release. For proof, Sri Lanka did not hesitate to remove and torture two local staff of the United Nations.

    NGOs and UN must confront an existential question: did they help a population in distress or are they complicit in a large-scale incarceration? This question has become increasingly complex as the rainy season approaches, which could sow chaos inside the camps. Already in the month of August, rain has washed away the tents of thousands of refugees, and hundreds of families are inconvenienced and agitating inside the camps.

    Instead of making peace, President Rajapaksa and his brother Gotabhaya, Secretary of Defense, are exhibiting vengeance: they have declared the war against the civil society.

    In recent weeks, a renowned Tamil journalist was sentenced to twenty years in prison; a human rights activist has received death threats; a video seemingly showing Sri Lankan soldiers executing naked men convinced the UN to consider investigation.

    The Sri Lankan Government is in a position of strength. It has developed dependent friendships with with the least recommendable regimes on the planet and has had to deal with minor retaliatory measures on the part of the Western powers.

    The LTTE and its local supporters are destroyed. But, under the tents of the refugee camps, tomorrow's Tigers may already be rising to mount a future rebellion.

  • TNA outlines political formula

    Based on Self-Determination, distinct and comprehensive autonomy to the historical homeland of Eelam Tamils is the political solution envisaged by the Tamil National Alliance (TNA) to the ethnic conflict in the island of Sri Lanka, said veteran Tamil politician and TNA Parilamentary Group Leader R. Sampanthan, while addressing the press in Jaffna Tuesday. Mr. Sampanthan, who said that a draft proposal of the TNA will be released soon, was optimistic of India's support. This is the first time the TNA is coming out with its own political formula to resolve the ethnic conflict.

     

    TNA Parliamentary Group leader R. SampanthanA political formula to resolve the ethnic question of Eelam Tamils is currently being drafted by the TNA and it will be presented soon to Colombo, New Delhi and to the International Community, Mr. Sampanthan said while answering a question at the ITAK office located on Martin Road.

     

    "All powers needed including land, agriculture, industries and security should be in our hands," Mr. Sampanthan said. "Financial arrangements including powers to raise funds inside and outside of the island are also crucial." Tamil diaspora is keen in investing in the North and East and the TNA is engaged in talks with everyone concerned and in planning with foreign governments, he added.

     

    In a recent meeting with the Indian Foreign Minister, the TNA had expressed its willingness to work along with the Indian government and the Indian FM has reciprocated by assuring his government's cooperation, Mr. Sampanthan said.

     

    All formulas such as the 13th Amendment, 13+, 13++ etc., being spoken about by the Sri Lankan ministers have been dumped to the dustbin by the SL President Mahinda Rajapaksa, he added. It was only because of international pressure Mr. Rajapaksa was talking about considering 13th Amendment as a beginning, but he is not interested in it anymore as pressure mounts on him from JVP and other Sinhala parties, Sampanthan said.

     

    Taking a stand that there is no majority or minority in the island, the SL President ignores the plight of Tamils and Muslims, Sampanthan blamed and added that the displaced Tamils and Muslims have to be resettled in their own places.

     

    Some high ranking sections of the SL government threaten to re-impose restriction on fishing in Jaffna if people are not voting in favour of the government in the forthcoming Jaffna Municipality elections.

     

    Tamils, either in the North or in the East, do not own or operate trawlers engaged in Deep Sea fishing at the moment. According to Central Bank statistics of March 2009, out of 2814 trawlers in the island, only two are in Jaffna, but they are not operating. The only one trawler that was in Tamil hands in Trincomalee has been coerced to be sold. In the meantime, more than 1,000 trawlers belonging to Sinhalese are fishing in the waters of the East. This is the situation when the Colombo government comes out with threats such as re-imposing fishing restrictions [There was a time when 60% of the islands fisheries was carried out by the Tamils]. This threat comes from sections that have now rallied behind the ruling party's betel symbol. How could these politicians, who are unable to even retain their party's own Vee'nai symbol are going to help Tamils winning their rights, asked Sampanthan.

     

    Meanwhile, Mavai Senathirajah, who addressed the same press conference blamed some sections for making propaganda that there is dissention in the TNA. The SL government, in the past, destroyed political parties and bought over some of them. "The TNA is the one and only political alliance that is immune to such tactics of the government. Our people will not allow any dissention in the TNA. Our diaspora also insists on the unity of the TNA," Mr. Senathirajah said.

     

    Even Mahinda Rajapaksa has recently said that a political solution has to be negotiated with the TNA, he added.

     

    Sampanthan, Mavai Senathiraja, Suresh Premachandran, Gajendrakumar Ponnampalam, Pathmini Sithamparanathan, Solemon Siril and Thuraratnasingham were present at the press conference.

     

    In the meantime, TNA parliamentarians Kanagasapai, William Thomas and Ariyanethran are arriving Jaffna on Tuesday to engage in election campaign. Mr. Sivasakthy Anandan and Kishore are actively engaged in election campaign for ITAK in Vavuniyaa, Mavai Senathirajah told reporters.

  • Sri Lanka pressures murdered aid workers’ families

    The Sri Lankan government is putting pressure on the families of murdered aid workers to seek compensation from the charity that had employed the 17 individuals at the time of their murder.

                           

    The families were sent letters by the Sri Lankan government, which seek more compensation from Action Contra la Faim (ACF), reported the BBC.

     

    The authorities deny the letters exist, but the BBC reports that it has seen copies of them.

     

    The relatives have told the BBC that they do not want to press for more compensation from the French charity.

     

    There was an outcry when the 17 aid workers were killed in 2006. The aid staff - all but one of them ethnic Tamils - were working on tsunami relief projects in the north-eastern town of Muttur when they were killed on 4 August 2006.

     

    Critics say Sri Lanka has a long history of failing to prosecute rights abuses.

     

    Nordic monitors overseeing a truce in the country's civil war at the time blamed security forces, who denied the charge.

     

    Earlier this month, Sri Lanka's top human rights panel cleared the army, pinning the killings on Tamil Tiger (LTTE) or Muslim home guards.

     

    The commission of inquiry also said compensation already paid to victims' families of about 400,000 Sri Lanka rupees (about $3,480) was "totally inadequate".

     

    A number of relatives of the murdered aid workers say they do not want to sign the government's letters, while others have refused to comment due to what their lawyers described as fear of intimidation, the BBC reported.

     

    "Money will not help us. We cannot get our relatives back anyway," one family member of the victims told the BBC.

     

    The BBC claimed to have seen three letters seeking more compensation from ACF, reporting that the letters were handed to the victims' families on 19 July at a government administration office in the eastern town of Trincomalee. They were due to be signed and handed back by Saturday 25 July.

     

    One letter was addressed to the French ambassador in Sri Lanka, a second to the country's attorney general.

     

    "We the heirs of the deceased are aware of the interest France and the French government has taken in human rights aspects especially in the... commission of inquiry into the killing in Muttur of 17 aid workers," the letter addressed to the French ambassador said.

     

    "Therefore we trust that the French government will take necessary steps to oversee the payment of due compensation to the kinsmen/ women of the deceased."

     

    A third letter seen by the BBC commended President Rajapaksa for investigating the killings.

     

    "We are extremely grateful to Your Excellency for appointing a commission of inquiry and ensuring that justice prevailed," the letter said.

     

    "We agree with the findings of the commission that the deaths were caused by the LTTE and the compensation as determined must be paid by ACF," it said.

     

    A senior government official denied any knowledge of such letters being issued.

     

    Rajiva Wijesinghe, secretary to the ministry of human rights and disaster management, told BBC Sinhala that ACF had done a "very bad thing" by "forcing" its staff to work close to the battlefield.

     

    "Some workers were even denied leave by ACF. They were forced to go towards the battlefield while many other aid workers were leaving the area," he said.

     

    He added that the compensation paid by ACF "for their own wrongdoing" was inadequate.

     

    There was no immediate response from the charity, which has accused Sri Lanka's government of lacking the will to find those responsible for murdering its staff.

     

    It is not clear whether any of the families has returned the signed documents to the authorities.

  • ‘End of conflict brings children no respite from human rights abuses’

    Despite the end of hostilities, children in Sri Lanka continue to be at risk of forced recruitment, arbitrary detention and other human rights abuses, the Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers (Coalition) said on Tuesday, 28 July.

                             

    In a new briefing to the Security Council Working Group (Working Group) on Children and Armed Conflict, the Coalition urged the Sri Lankan authorities to act immediately to protect conflict-affected children.

     

    Children are among dozens of people who have been detained by security forces in internally

    displaced person (IDP) camps in Vavuniya, apparently for their alleged links to the Liberation

    Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

     

    In one case in June 2009, a group of four or five girls and boys from a camp in Menik Farm were reportedly detained and questioned by members of the Sri Lankan military. One of the girls admitted that she had been with the LTTE for two days.

     

    The children were subsequently taken away and there has been no news of them since.

     

    “The families of children taken by the security forces from detention camps have no idea where they are – if they are in detention, have been taken to rehabilitation centres or have disappeared ” said the Director of the Coali tion, Victoria Forbes Adam.

     

    Given the background of large-scale disappearances in Sri Lanka, there are grave fears that some of the reported incidents of children and adults being removed from IDP camps may represent enforced disappearances.

     

    “There are simple steps that can be taken to enhance the security of children in IDP camps including allowing unhindered access to independent human rights monitors and maintaining a centralized register of all persons in the camps. Families should also be informed of where their children have been taken and their access to them should be facilitated ” said Victoria Forbes Adam.

     

    The Coalition has received reports of continued abductions for ransom and forced recruitment of children by pro-government armed groups.

     

    Unverified reports indicate that young boys in rehabilitation centres in Vavuniya have been forced to join pro-government armed groups including the Eelam People’s Democratic Party (EPDP)and Tamil People’s Liberation Front (TMVP).

     

    They are now reportedly collecting ‘protection money’ from merchants and traders in Vavuniya town.

     

    There are also sporadic reports of child recruitment in Batticaloa district by the TMVP and cadres loyal to the former TMVP leader, V. Muralitharan, known as Karuna.

     

    “Armed groups are clearly operating with the support of the security forces who are allowing them access to IDP camps and centres for surrendees and using them to identify individuals formerly associated with the LTTE. The Sri Lankan authorities must act immediately to prevent armed groups from entering facilities where children are housed and must investigate reports of ongoing abductions and recruitment by them ” said Victoria Forbes Adam.

     

    An entrenched culture of impunity in Sri Lanka facilitates ongoing abuses against children.

     

    In 2007 the government initiated an investigation into elements of the armed forces suspected of complicity in the forced recruitment of children by the TMVP. Twenty-three months later it has yet to be completed.

     

    In the meantime, Karuna, the former head of the TMVP, has been made a government minister. Karuna also stands accused of recruiting thousands of child soldiers when he was an LTTE commander prior to his split with the group in 2004. No known action has been taken against any member of the security forces or of any armed group suspected of child abductions or forced recruitment.

     

    Intense recruitment of children by the LTTE during the final phase of the conflict has created serious challenges for the release and reintegration of underage recruits.

     

    While the government has set up a framework to provide support for children leaving armed groups through the establishment of accommodation and rehabilitation centres, the efforts fall short of internationally recognized best practice.

     

    Under the framework, there are concerns that former child soldiers may be held in custody for up to one year without clear grounds.

     

    Further, there are concerns about the inadequate access of these children to their families; the incomplete separation of children from adults; and the security of children in the centres.

     

    “The end of the 25 -year long conflict represents a unique opportunity to release and reintegrate all former child soldiers and to assist thousands of other conflict-affected children in Sri Lanka. It will take concerted and coordinated efforts by the Sri Lankan authorities and the international community to ensure that this opportunity is not squandered.”

  • Sri Lanka deaths probe demanded

    The New York-based group Human Rights Watch on Tuesday pressed for an international probe into the killings in Sri Lanka of 17 local employees of a French charity three years ago.

     

    HRW marked the anniversary of the execution-style murders of the Action Against Hunger (ACF) workers in Sri Lanka's northeastern town of Muttur with a scathing attack on the country's leaders.

     

    The group accused the government of grossly mishandling the investigation into the deaths of local employees of the Action Against Hunger group.

     

    "Since the ACF massacre, the (President Mahinda) Rajapakse government has put on an elaborate song and dance to bedazzle the international community into believing justice is being done," said HRW director James Ross.

     

    "It's time the UN and concerned governments say 'the show is over' and put into place a serious international inquiry."

     

    "Instead of doing all it can to get justice for this horrific crime, the Sri Lankan government is further traumatising the victims' families by trying to shift the blame to others."

     

    ACF itself has demanded an international investigation after a government probe failed to identify any suspects.

     

    The call came last month after a Sri Lankan investigation cleared the military of killing the 17 employees of the charity, but ordered more compensation for the families of the victims.

     

    HRW said that an international inquiry was needed into the murders. Sixteen of the victims were ethnic Tamils.

     

    Thirteen men and four women who worked on water sanitation and farm projects for ACF were found shot dead in an area where government troops and the Liberation Tigers were fighting.

     

    Nordic peace monitors at the time blamed the killings – the worst attack on aid workers since the bombing of the UN headquarters in Baghdad in August 2003 – on government forces.

     

    The government has denied any role.

     

    The commission blamed the killings on either the Tamil Tigers or auxiliary police known as home guards. Its full report to President Mahinda Rajapaksa remains unpublished.

     

    But HRW says that this report was based primarily on "limited witness testimony" from people who said that the armed forces were not in the vicinity at the time.

     

    Excerpts from the commission's final report posted on the Sri Lankan Ministry of Defense website sharply criticize the role of local organizations in the ACF inquiry.

     

    These organizations provided legal support for witnesses and made a number of written submissions on the case, HRW noted in a press release.

     

    The commission stated that the "main function" of seven named nongovernmental organizations was to "attempt to discredit every possible institution and authority of this country before the Commission, and attempt to hold one party responsible for the gruesome crime.... They appeared not to ascertain the truth but to engage in a fault finding exercise of the security forces of Sri Lanka."

     

    The commission said the groups adopted "a suspiciously narrow outlook" and engaged in a "preconceived plan or conspiracy to discredit the Commission ... for the consumption of some of the international organizations."

     

    Human Rights Watch said that such accusations, made in the current context of continuing threats and physical assaults against media and civil society groups labeled "traitorous" or otherwise anti-government, place individuals and organizations at serious risk.

     

    Colombo appointed 11 foreign diplomats and dignitaries to supervise the probe, but they pulled out in April 2008 saying the investigation did not meet minimum international standards.

     

    "On the third anniversary of the murder of 17 aid workers, the Sri Lankan government is no closer to uncovering the truth or prosecuting those responsible," said Ross.

     

    "Instead, the government is using the atrocity to threaten local rights groups, intimidate the victims' families, and score political points against the French government."

  • President Rajapakse will give nothing to Tamils – Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam

    “Tamils should be vigilant of Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapakse’s intentions. He says that there is no minority race in the country but only a majority race. It is clear that his intention is to assimilate the Tamil race into the Majority Sinhala race in Sri Lanka,” Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam, Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Jaffna district parliamentarian, told TamilNet Saturday,  in an interview in Jaffna.

     

    “Mr. Rajapakse spoke of 13th Amendment before he waged the war on Vanni and during the later stage of the war he spoke of 13 ‘double plus’. Now he says that he is going to offer a political solution to the ethnic issue,” Gajendrakumar said.

    “But in a recent interview to an Indian website he said that power devolution is a long term issue and the proposal now would create tumult in the country. We are certain that Mahinda thinks that the Tamils need not be given any solution,” he said.

    India openly assured us that the Vanni people will be resettled within 180 days but we knew that Sri Lanka will not keep its promises. Now it is forced to speak of resettlement due to International pressure. But some persons here say that action is being taken to resettle the Vanni displaced people because they had urged the President to do so,” Gajendrakumar said.

    “The real intention of Mr Rajapakse is to crush the Tamil struggle, Tamil Nationalism and leave the Tamils with nothing. The government tries to present a picture of Tamils wishing to live along with the Sinhalese, and the UPFA uses this now as a deplorable election gimmick, he further said.

    “Mahinda had made Karuna the SLFP organizer for the East and now he will make Minister Douglas Devananda its organizer for the North. He thinks that there will be no minority issue in the country after that,” he told TamilNet.

    “Lifting the existing restrictions has been made election propaganda. The restrictions were imposed saying that they were necessary to destroy the Liberation Tigers. Why should they continue even after destroying the Tigers as the government claims?” Gajendrakumar asked.

    “Buddhist monks support the government. Wimal Weerawanse’s JVP party supports it. Besides, around 30 UNP parliamentarians support the government. In this context why can’t the government bring about a political solution?” he further questioned.

    “It is obvious that Mr. Rajapakse does not wish to give anything to the Tamils,” Gajendrakumar said.

    On being asked whether TNA would consider if Mahinda Rajapakse proposes a political solution, Gajendrakumar said that they would explore the possibilities of considering the proposal if and when put forward by the ruling party.
     

Subscribe to NorthEast