Sri Lanka

Taxonomy Color
red
  • Beginning of a new terror in Sri Lanka

    Shortly after Sri Lanka’s 61st independence day celebrations on February 4 and his rousing speech on the occasion, President Mahinda Rajapakse was photographed intently watching a snake-charmer at an exhibition in Colombo. In the north-east of the country, his men in battle fatigues are doing the work of the snake-charmer, but with a minor difference. Their deadly opponents are not being incarcerated, but are being systematically obliterated from the face of the earth. And the success of the army in that job has been so overwhelming that the Rajapakses cannot but watch with bewilderment. A much-enthused Gotabaya Rajapakse, the defence secretary and brother of the president, has even wondered aloud why no one had done this before — “crush them with numbers”.
     
    It is not as if the idea hadn’t occurred to leaders of previous dispensations. In fact, it was the persistent lure of watching the majority (Sinhalas) swamp the minority (Tamils) that has pushed Sri Lankan politics onto a rather tragic path. The numbers game may be the cause of the war in Sri Lanka, but not the reason its government is winning it now. The acquired ability of the army to best the fighters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam at their own game of guerrilla warfare and the ruthless bombardments from the sky that make no distinction between Tiger hideouts and schools and hospitals are the two main reasons behind the success of the Rajapakse government’s military operation. The numerical advantage Gotabaya talks about remains undiminished. In the days ahead, it can be expected to play itself out in much the same fashion as it did during the days of the Bandaranaikes, J.R. Jayewardene and even Chandrika Kumaratunga, when jointly-agreed pacts were dumped to respect the majority sentiment. But before that happens, there is a minor play to be staged with the much-lauded concept of devolution of powers to the war-ravaged parts in the north and the east — an assurance for which India has fallen hook, line and sinker.
     
    Ever since the Rajapakse government’s all-out effort to exterminate the Tigers became apparent and started to be questioned because of its severity, it has held out the carrot of devolution to ward off unsolicited interventions from outside the country. An all party representative committee, minus representation from major Tamil parties as also the Opposition, was hurriedly constituted in 2006 before the military offensive started. In its interim proposal, the APRC suggested full implementation of the 13th amendment to the constitution (which followed the India-Lanka accord of 1987). This meant “maximum and effective devolution” of powers to the north and east.
    Two years later, when the nation seems to be teetering on the brink of a major breakthrough, the APRC is still in no hurry to finalize its proposals, and can only think of offering the provincial councils “a little more power” than originally planned. Without fiscal and police powers, this amounts to hardly anything.
    For the president, however, this is no worry. In his scheme of things, devolution comes last, that is, only after demilitarization, democratization and development (in that order). As he puts it, “It is useless to give them devolution when they are not ready to accept it or you can’t implement it.” Meanwhile, the basic criterion of the devolution, that was the merging of the northern and eastern provincial councils, has been done away with following their de-merger on the basis of a supreme court verdict in 2006. The government has made no appeals to the court or tried to work around the problem. For it, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna-instigated demerger removes a major worry over the threat that a merged province would have posed to the country’s unitary structure in case the conjoined province became restive.
    So far as the administration is concerned, the problem with the Eastern council has been neatly resolved. Following the provincial council elections last year, amidst widespread allegations of foul play, the Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Puligal, a breakaway Tiger faction, has been put in power. The armed TMVP militia ensures that the writ of the central government runs here.
     
    The greatly thankful, newly appointed chief minister, Pillayan, can only hope that the government relents and grants him enough powers “to implement policies that [they] would like to for the benefit of the people” since even basic development projects are carried out by the central government.
    But then the challenge had been different in a multi-ethnic Eastern province that has a substantial Muslim presence. It is quite another for a mono-ethnic, mono-lingual province like the Northern. The threat perception from it is so severe that a major campaign is already under way to create awareness of this security threat and force the government to consider each district in it as a distinct unit of administration, and hence of devolution, instead of considering the province as a whole. The fervent hope is that the crumbs of office will effectively forestall the power-hungry leaders (and Tamils can be no exception to the rule) from throwing in their lot with the Tigers again.
     
    Threat perception. There it goes again. It is because of the threat perception that the newly liberated, and democratized Eastern province continues to be under siege. There are “mini-fortresses with earth embankments, look-out towers made of old railway sleepers and ammunition boxes, and roll after roll of razor wire”.
     
    The Northern province, given its compromised status, could look even worse when it is re-populated. With the original inhabitants killed in the crossfire or tucked away in high-security camps, where they will be sifted from suspected Tigers by the State’s ingenious methods, the threat could be minimized by bringing in settlers. And there are seemingly credible reports already that the process has started.
     
    Another threat perception that NGOs are in cahoots with the Tigers had made the government hound them out of the country. That attitude is not going to change in a hurry. This means that the millions displaced by the war will continue to be at the mercy of the Sinhala-majority government. This is probably what Rajapakse has in mind when he repeatedly assures the world that he will “personally” take care of the rehabilitation of the internally-displaced population.
     
    For the Tamil population elsewhere, especially in the capital, which will be more vulnerable to LTTE suicide attacks than ever before, the burden of proving innocence will be heavier. But this burden of proof will no longer be shouldered by Tamils alone. This is probably where the most enviable victory for Sri Lanka will turn into its worst defeat. As the country turns into a police State to quell the threat perception, each citizen will become suspect in the eyes of the administration and of his neighbour unless he can prove his nationalist credentials. The foremost criterion is to show support for the government’s war efforts. Already, the cloud of mistrust and suspicion is darkening the horizon in the urban space. The ministry of defence has reportedly asked all citizens to register online, and people no longer feel confident to talk freely on the mobile in public. The vicious killings of mediapersons, the attacks on the media, the threat of being “chased out” are evidence of the shrunken tolerance for balanced, independent opinion. Gotabaya Rajapakse has warned that the war strategy will change after the Tigers are decimated, and “intelligence” will become a crucial part of this. Another reign of terror, State-sponsored quite obviously, is in the making.
     
    Two factors will determine how extensively this terror is perpetrated — international pressure and pressure from within Sri Lanka. The last will depend on how effectively the Opposition, that is the United National Party under Ranil Wickremesinghe, shapes up its pro-freedom, pro-rights and anti-corruption agenda. But if its campaign for the forthcoming elections in the Central provinces and Wayamba is any indication, it is clearly stumped by the war propaganda. A proactive judiciary could be Sri Lanka’s saviour if it could push through the establishment of the constitutional council. The council, in which the Opposition will also sit, and which will have powers to regulate appointments in the police, judiciary and government, could curb police excesses and corruption.
     
    As for foreign powers, it is unlikely that India will manage to have a lever in the internal reorganization of Sri Lanka now that it has shown its hand. Too much meddling may be counter-productive as it will antagonize the ultranationalist Sinhala parties. What it can do is pledge assistance in relief efforts and hope it will be accepted. The Co-Chairs of Sri Lanka’s donors, the United States of America, the European Union, Japan and Norway, too, could concentrate on the post-war rehabilitation without sending out confusing signals by insisting on amnesty for all Tigers.
  • Friends protect Sri Lanka at international level
    While world powers look apparently condemning Colombo for its culture of impunity allowing armed forces and other elements to commit human rights violations, some among the very powers are engaged covertly in ensuring international impunity to Colombo's war crimes by dodging discussion on Sri Lanka in the apex international security system.
     
    During the closed-door meetings of the UN Security Council this week, when Mexico moved for briefing on Sri Lankan situation, Russia reportedly blocked it saying it was not in the agenda.
     
    Indian interests being looked after in the UN Security council by Russia is a long convention.

    Even as official reports put the daily civilian death count at 40 a day in the conflict zone, at UN, Russia's Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said "we believe the Security Council must stick to items on its agenda." and added there are "other fora" for information about the fighting in Sri Lanka.
     
    When the British Representative to the UN was asked why Sri Lanka was not in the deliberations, while Sudan was in, the answer was that the situation was entirely different in Sri Lanka where "proscribed" Tamil Tigers were long "blighting" the government and that has to be brought to an end.

    “What the UN-UK position is on that? Why hasn’t it been raised in the Security Council”, asked an Inner City Press reporter.
     
    “Well, the situation in Sri Lanka is entirely different. We do have concerns about the humanitarian situation in Sri Lanka. We have urged the government of Sri Lanka to have everything in count to bring an end to the hostilities so that humanitarian relief can be extended to the civilians.. (a word not audible).”
     
    “The Tamil Tigers are a proscribed organisation and the government of Sri Lanka has long been blighted by the activities of the Tamil Tigers. We want these to be brought to an end. And we want the people of the affected areas in Sri Lanka to be able to have full access to the humanitarian relief”, replied the British ambassador to the UN.

    The British position of sidelining the gravity of current genocidal situation faced by Tamil civilians as an internal affair, not needed to be brought to the attention of UN has caused serious concerns in Tamil circles.

    “In fact, barring the tone, mannerism and choice of words, the British ambassador to UN says exactly the same thing what Colombo’s Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse said to BBC on Tuesday that the war in Sri Lanka is only between ‘terrorists’ and the people who fight against terrorists”, he added.

    The Colombo government’s open contempt and ridicule to international concerns about the human rights situation in the island as demonstrated in the Tuesday’s interview of Rajapakse to BBC is widely seen as arising from the international impunity enjoyed by it, thanks to the British government and many others.
  • LTTE welcomes appointment of British Special Envoy
    Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) welcomed the appointment of Des Browne as Special Envoy to Sri Lanka by the British Prime Minister on Thursday, February 12.
     
    In a letter addressed to Des Browne, LTTE's Head of International Diplomatic Relations S. Pathmanathan said the British government had a moral responsibility to intervene to stop the genocide being committed by the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) on Tamil civilians in the island of Sri Lanka.

    The LTTE remained committed to a peaceful solution to the conflict and honoured the February 2002 peace pact, the letter addressed to Browne further added.

    Britain named a special envoy to Sri Lanka to help bring about a political solution to the island’s long-running conflict and to ease hardships to Tamil civilians trapped in the Vanni war zone.

    Pathmanathan, a senior leader of the LTTE is working abroad with required mandate from the LTTE leadership to represent the movement in any future peace initiatives and to function as the primary point of contact for engaging with the international community.
  • Sri Lanka rejects British envoy, warns of "major repercussions"
    Sri Lanka reacted with fury over Britain’s appointment of a special envoy to the country, labelling the appointment as ‘tantamount to an intrusion into Sri Lanka's internal affairs’ and warning of ‘major repercussions’ for relations with Britain.
     
    Sri Lanka’s reaction followed Downing Street’s announcement of former defence scretary Des Browne as Britain’s special envoy to Sri Lanka to focus on "the immediate humanitarian situation in northern Sri Lanka and the government of Sri Lanka's work to set out a political solution to bring about a lasting end to the conflict".
     
    "As special envoy, he will work closely with the Sri Lankan government, leaders from all communities in Sri Lanka, international agencies and the wider international community." a statement released by Downing Street on Thursday, February 12, said.
     
    Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama reacted to the British move by calling it "a disrespectful intrusion" and vented his fury saying Des Browne's appointment wouldn't be accepted by Colombo.
     
    "It is tantamount to an intrusion into Sri Lanka's internal affairs and is disrespectful to the country's statehood," the minister said, warning "there could be major repercussions" for relations with the UK.
     
    An embarrassed British Foreign Office however fought off objections from Sri Lanka stating that the appointment of Des Browne wasn't made unilaterally and insisted discussions with the Sri Lankan were ongoing.
     
    "The Foreign Secretary (David Miliband) spoke this morning to the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama," a Foreign Office spokesman said.
     
    "He explained the reasons the United Kingdom was proposing a special envoy and that this was not a unilateral decision.”
     
    But the Sri Lankan foreign minister Rohitha Bogollagama rejected claims of ongoing discussions saying "There is no further discussion with London on the matter."
     
    Des Browne's new job has also brought criticism from the political opposition in Britain, reported the BBC.
     
    Speaking for the Conservatives, Liam Fox, said it was a further example of Gordon Brown's incompetence as prime minister.
     
    "Having presided over calamitous damage to our economy," said Mr Fox told the BBC, "he is now making a complete mess of relations with friendly countries overseas."
     
    The Liberal Democrats criticised Gordon Brown for not taking tougher action on Sri Lanka, by seeking a ceasefire in through diplomatic channels at the United Nations, reported the BBC.
     
    The stand-off comes amid mounting tension between Sri Lanka and the international community over the impact of the government's war against the LTTE.
     
    Anxious to win its decades-long conflict against the LTTE in the northeast of the country, the Sri Lankan state has brushed aside concerns over the humanitarian impact of its escalating battles. 
  • UN avoids calls for ceasefire
    After not taking up the violence in Sri Lanka in Security Council briefings and avoiding calls for a ceasefire in Sri Lanka, the United Nations on called for a halt to ‘indiscriminate fighting’.
     
    “We are outraged by the unnecessary loss of hundreds of lives and the continued suffering of innocent people inside the LTTE-controlled areas,” Ron Redmond a spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, said on Tuesday February 10.
     
    “We are calling on both the government and the LTTE to halt indiscriminate fighting” near civilians said Redmond.
     
    Earlier, during a media briefing when Inner City Press asked why United Nations General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon, had not called for a ceasefire in the south Asian island he responded by saying Sri Lanka is not on the agenda of the Security Council, and therefore he cannot call for a ceasefire.
     
    However, this month's Security Council president Yukio Takasu dismissed Ban Ki-Moons argument, stating "the Secretary General has very important responsibility granted in the Charter, he can draw the attention of the international community to any issue that matters to peace and security."
     
    In his lengthy response to Inner Cirty Press, Ban Ki-Moon also said that "respect for the sovereignty of member states is another principle" he makes his decisions by, clearly indicating that Sri Lanka not being in the agenda is not the real reason for UN not calling for a ceasefire.
  • US imposes sanctions on Tamil charity
    The United States Treasury imposed sanctions on a Tamil foundation in Maryland, accusing it of being part of a support network for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
     
    In recent weeks thousands of American Tamils have participated in protests across the United States denouncing the killing of Tamil civilians by Sri Lankan forces and demanding an immediate ceasefire.
     
    Tamil political observers see the US government’s move as being aimed at frightening the Tamil Diaspora and curbing their political activities.
     
    The sanctions against the Tamil Foundation, which Treasury said was a front for the Sri Lanka-based Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, allows the U.S. government to freeze assets the foundation may have in the United States and prohibits U.S. banks and consumers from conducting business deals with it.
     
    "The LTTE, like other terrorist groups, has relied on so-called charities to raise funds and advance its violent aims," said Adam Szubin, director of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
     
    The head of the Tamil Foundation is also president of the Tamils Rehabilitation Organization in the United States, which was named in 2007 as a terrorist support group under a White House executive order.
     
    Over the course of many years, the Tamil Foundation and TRO have co-mingled funds and carried out coordinated financial actions, Treasury said. Additional information links the Tamil Foundation to the TRO through a matching gift program, the department said.
     
    In the US, TRO has raised funds for the LTTE through a network of individual representatives the organisation is the preferred means for sending funds from the US to the LTTE in Sri Lanka, the department claimed.
     
    The US Department of State designated the LTTE a Foreign Terrorist Organisation on October 8, 1997 and named it an SDGT on November 2, 2001.
  • India changes language with measured ambiguity
    India has changed its stand on Sri Lanka, no longer insisting that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) lay down arms as a pre-condition for negotiations with the Sri Lankan government for a political settlement.
     
    The subtle change in India's stand was reflected in President Pratibha Patil's address to Parliament in New Delhi on Thursday, February 11.
     
    Indian President Prathiba Patil in her address to the joint sitting of Indian Parliament declared that India continued to support a negotiated political settlement in Sri Lanka within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all the communities, including the Tamil community.
     
    Ms. Prathiba Patil urged Colombo and the Tigers to return to negotiating table, seen as another change of stance.

    Addressing the members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, Ms. Pratibha Devisingh Patil said:

    "We are concerned at the plight of civilians internally displaced in Sri Lanka on account of escalation of the military conflict. We continue to support a negotiated political settlement in Sri Lanka within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all the communities, including the Tamil community. I would appeal to the Government of Sri Lanka and to the LTTE to return to the negotiating table. This can be achieved if, simultaneously, the Government of Sri Lanka suspends its military operations and the LTTE declares its willingness to lay down arms and to begin talks with the government."

    The address of the President of India in the joint session of the Parliament is a declared official position of the Government of India (GoI).

    Even though the relevant part of the declaration began saying "we continue to support," the nuances of Indian position have changed significantly.

    Instead of silently allowing the continuation of war, the GoI has asked the Parties to return to the negotiating table.

    India has also taken a position that the LTTE is a partner in the negotiations.

    GoI now requests both parties to act simultaneously: Colombo to suspend military operations and the Tigers to declare its willingness to lay down arms, which allows room for both parties to actually end the war only after reaching a mutually accepted position in the political negotiations.

    Laying down arms is specifically understood as surrender in the usage of English language (The Concise Oxford Dictionary). But, "declare its willingness" provides space for conditional engagement.

    The statement 'within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all communities, including the Tamil community,' is ambiguous and could mean acceptance coming from the Tamil people is a precondition for an undivided Sri Lanka.

    However, in the wake of Colombo's rejection of the British attempt to appoint a Special Envoy to Sri Lanka to help seek a political solution, it remains to be seen how Colombo will respond to the changed nuances in the stance of the Indian government.

    PTI reported members of PMK and MDMK, wearing black shirts, rose at one point during her 80-minute long speech and shouted: 'Your Highness, please stop the war in Sri Lanka'.
  • Congress feels the heat in parliament
    The Congress led UPA government came under severe criticism from inside and outside of the Parliament, for its continued support for Sri Lanka’s war and for being indifferent to suffering of Tamils in the neighbouring island.
     
    Cutting across party lines, members in both Houses of Parliament voiced serious concern on Friday, February 13, over the spiralling death toll of Tamil civilians and India’s inaction.
     
    Raising the issue in Rajya Sabha, BJP leader S Thirunavukkarasar said
    the Sri Lankan army was killing innocent Tamils in that country and India was helping the Sri Lankan government.
     
    Accusing the Indian government of inaction, Thirunavukkarasar added nothing was being done to alleviate the suffering of people. He urged the government to take up the matter in the United Nations and work for ensuring a ceasefire.
     
    He also demanded that the Indian Government should not help the Sri Lankan government and stop military aid.

    D. Raja of CPI said a genocide was going on in the island nation and described the situation there as very disturbing.
     
    Charging that India was providing radar expertise and naval cover to the Sri Lankan army thereby giving it a tactical edge in the ongoing strife, he demanded that the government reconsider the existing policy.
     
    Accusing the UPA government of failing to safeguard the lives of Tamils in Sri Lanka, Raja said:  "India cannot treat this as an internal problem of Sri Lanka,"
     
    V. Maitreyan of AIADMK assured the government of his party's support in whatever it did to stop the war.
     
    Sharing their concern, Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs V Narayansamy said, “The President of India made it very clear about the Indian Government’s policy on Sri Lanka”.
     
    Raising the issue in Lok Sabha during zero hour, BJP member Santosh Gangwar said the government should take appropriate steps for the safety of Tamils in Sri Lanka.
     
    PMK leader Ramadoss said that it was a clear case of genocide of the Tamil population.
     
    Taking strong exception to the argument of the Indian Government, Ramadoss said "Tamilians issue in Sri Lanka is an Indian issue. We should not keep silent by saying that it is an internal matter of Sri Lanka," 
     
    Rupchand Pal (CPI-M) suggested a peaceful resolution of the issue.
  • Sri Lanka says Tamils will be locked up in concentration camps for years
    Sri Lankan government last week unveiled plans to detain a large proportion of the Tamil civilian population of Vanni for at least three years in concentration camps which it calls ‘welfare villages’.
     
    Tamil political activists both in Sri Lanka and India reacted with outrage at the proposal that remind of concentration camps in World War 2 Germany and, in recent times, Bosnia. Alarmed human rights organisations also expressed their concern but in somewhat muted fashion considering nature of the proposal.
     
    However, more interestingly there no response at all from international powers that has been espousing liberal values and preaching human rights to Sri Lanka.
     
    The government proposal calls for creating four villages, totalling nearly 1,000 acres, in the Vavuniya district and a fifth 100-acre camp in the neighbouring Mannar area, to house approximately 250,000 displaced Tamils.
     
    The villages would have 39,000 semi-permanent homes, 7,800 toilets and 780 septic tanks, as well as parks, post offices, banks, stores and about 390 community centers with televisions and radios, according to the plan.
     
    All Tamils fleeing the fighting will be locked up in the centres and will have no choice on whether they stay in the camps. They will be screened for terrorist connections and then held under armed guard, with only those with relatives inside the camp allowed to come and go. Single youngsters will be confined to the camps.
     
    “Of course, it will not be voluntary — we need to check everyone,” Rajiva Wijesinha, the Secretary of the Ministry of Disaster Management and Human Rights, said.
     
    “This is a situation where we’re dealing with terrorists who infiltrate civilian populations. Security has to be paramount.” He said that it was the only way to prevent LTTE attacks.
     
    Wijesinha, added that the camps would be run by the government but the military would have "great involvement."
    "There is a very clear security threat and we are not going to play games with the lives of our people," he said.
     
    Wijesinha also accused Amnesty, Human Rights Watch and international aid agencies of bias towards the LTTE and said, for that reason, the Government would limit aid groups’ access to camps and allow journalists to visit only on government tours.
     
    It remains unclear how long displaced Tamils will be forced to remain in the camps. The Sri Lankan government had originally planned to detain civilians there for three years but, following concern from humanitarian groups, said they hoped to resettle 80 per cent within a year.
     
    A Tamil political analyst opined that Sri Lanka’s was revised timeframes are to soothe the humanitarian groups and it will keep the Tamils locked up for at least three years as it originally planned or for longer period.
     
    Tamil politicians outraged
     
    Indian and Sri Lankan Tamil MPs expressed outrage and urged the international community not to fund the camps without direct oversight and independent media access.
     
    “These are nothing but concentration camps,” said Raman Senthil, an Indian Tamil MP.
     
    “Why should they be in camps? If they are citizens they should be rehabilitated straight away.” Senthil told the Times newspaper.
     
    Mano Ganeshan, a Sri Lankan Tamil MP, told the Times: “I don’t want to say concentration camp yet, but they’re already detention camps and military grilling stations. They should be run and monitored by the international community.”
     
    Suren Surendiran, of the British Tamils Forum, told the Times that the camps were “like the detention centres where the Jews were held in World War Two”.
     
    Rights organisations concerned
     
    Human Rights Watch called the camps “detention centres” and said that they violated UN guidelines on internally displaced people, which say they can only be detained or interned under exceptional circumstances.
     
    “The Sri Lankan Government has not demonstrated that such circumstances exist,” said Charu Hogg, a Human Rights Watch spokeswoman.
     
    Amnesty International said that the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights obliged Sri Lanka to refrain from arbitrarily depriving any person’s right to liberty.
     
    “The Government wants international assistance but not international standards,” said Yolanda Foster, Amnesty’s Sri Lanka expert.
     
    Lone voices
     
    There was no reaction from foreign government or political parties in Sri Lanka, except for few lone voices.
     
    Robert Evans, a Labour MEP who has visited Sri Lanka as chairman of the European Parliament Delegation on Relations with South Asia, said:
    “These are not welfare camps, they are prisoner-of-war cum concentration camps.”
     
    Former Foreign minister Mangala Samaraweera, a former close aide to President Mahinda Rajapakse, said it was part of a police to paint all Tamils, even moderate opponents of the Tamil Tigers, as potential terrorists and to silence all Tamil voices.
     
    "It is amazing and terrible. A few months ago the government started registering all Tamils in Colombo on the grounds that they could be a security threat, but this could be exploited for other purposes like the Nazis in the 1930s. They're basically going to label the whole civilian Tamil population as potential terrorists, and as a result we are becoming a recruitment machine for the LTTE. Instead of winning hearts and minds of the Tamil people, we're pushing even the moderates into the arms of the LTTE by taking these horrendous steps," he told The Daily Telegraph.
     
    Foreign funding
     
    Professor Wijesinha told the Times that President Rajapaksa’s office drafted the original proposal two weeks ago and circulated it to foreign embassies and aid agencies to raise funding.
     
    One agency chief familiar with the plan said it would be very expensive.
     
    Not only would the government and aid groups have to feed, clothe and house the residents, but since most of the civilians are farmers, the economy would suffer as their fields lay fallow, reported Associated Press.
     
    A second proposal called for the construction of 40 schools to hold an expected 86,171 students. That plan asked international donors to fund everything from a photocopying machine for each school to instruments for the school band, at a total cost of about $14 million, Associated Press added.
     
    De facto detention centres
     
    The Government says that 32,000 civilians have fled the conflict zone in the past week and are being processed at 13 temporary camps. If the current internment camps are any indication of what the ‘welfare villages’ will be like they would be nothing less than concentration camps where Tamils will be locked up for a very long time and harassed day in day out.
     
    Amnesty describes the existing camps as “de facto detention centres” and accuses the army of taking hostages by allowing people to leave only if a relative stays behind.
  • The Will to Resist
    The Sri Lankan armed forces have massacred over two thousand Tamil civilians in Vanni during the past two months. This is not happening in secret, out of the world's gaze, but in plain sight. The horrific details of the Sri Lankan artillery bombardment and airstrikes are made available every day by a flood of data, pictures and footage. No Tamil can fail to be shaken by the murderous fanaticism of the Sinhala state and, especially, the complicit silence of the international community. The present is thus an important moment in Tamil national consciousness.
     
    Whilst some Tamil voices, including this newspaper, have often questioned the sincerity of the international community when it comes to the security and well-being of the Tamil people, others have decried such 'nationalism' and, projecting themselves as 'moderates', sought to enlist international support towards Tamils' aspirations - in the form of federalism, say. We have consistently argued that it is not the demand for Tamil Eelam that is the problem in Sri Lanka, but institutionalized Sinhala violence and oppression. Therefore, no ‘solution’ would suffice unless it could guarantee our people protection from Sri Lanka's genocide.
     
    Those 'moderates' who criticized the 'nationalists' for insisting on Eelam based their vision of a secure future for the Tamils one claim: the preparedness, even commitment, of the international community to intervene on the Tamils behalf if Sinhala violence against our people resumed. Indeed, the United States even went so far as to offer this; for example in a 2003 interview to Reuters, US Ambassador Ashley Wills had this to say: "I've heard Tamils say that they may not like the LTTE's tactics but they need the Tigers to protect them. I think that's completely wrong. …. Now that the world is paying attention to Sri Lanka as never before, the international community will be watching closely to see that no one's rights get abused systematically."
     
    Well, the present speaks for itself. The duplicity of the international community's 'support' for the peace process (which equates, for them, to disarming the LTTE) is underlined by their ongoing support for Sri Lanka's genocide. Throughout the Norwegian led 'peace process', the international community insisted repeatedly that the Tamils and the Tigers are separate. But their present actions reveal they do not really think so: it is in the interests of breaking the LTTE's resistance to the Sinhala state's onslaught that the Tamils are being massacred.
     
    For some time now, the end of the LTTE has been confidently predicted. The Sri Lanka Army commander boasted in January that the LTTE is no match for the 50,000 Sinhala troops advancing on Mullaitivu. Yet, the war grinds on - amid a near total blackout of the battlefield imposed by Colombo (save for the daily claims put forward by the Defence Ministry). Yet in the jungles and fields of Vanni, the Sri Lankan military is incurring casualties so heavy it dare not allow discussion amongst the Sinhalese. Between Feb 1 and Feb 4 a key SLA divisions was so badly mauled by an LTTE counter-attack that it has been pulled out of battle. Sri Lankan garrisons in other parts of the island are being thinned out - and police being drafted in - to sustain the war. In short, the Tigers are staging their signature ferocious resistance.
     
    It is amid the Sinhala state's manifest inability to break the LTTE's will to resist that the Tamils of Vanni are being punished. Targeting the enemy population to demoralise their combatants is not new - that's why the US, for example, slaughtered the citizens of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The massacres in Vanni are the continuation of what Prof. Sankaran Krishna has termed "annihilatory violence" inflicted by the Sinhalese against the Tamils since independence. Yet the Tamils refuse to submit to Sinhala rule.
     
    The key lesson for the Tamils today is the futility of relying on international support, on the basis of justice, human rights and such. The Tamil nation is making every effort to get Western states and other self-appointed trustees of liberal values to live up to their lofty ideals. These efforts are important for one reason; if - contrary to the claims of Tamil 'nationalists' - the international community is truly committed to these values (in the name of which they sought to deny and crush our justified demands for self-determination), then the Tamil people's agitation will elicit a principled response. If not, the Tamils can be certain that it is callous indifference, rather than ignorance, that guides international policy towards them. They will then, like other peoples who united behind the goal of independence, have to reflect on how, on their own, they can ensure Sri Lanka's genocide does not succeed.
  • In Sri Lanka, Tamil women suffer the worst of war
    In one of the biggest hospitals in Sri Lanka's north, many women patients wonder why they survived the fighting between the Tamil Tigers and the military that killed so many of their friends.
     
    A woman in her late 40s frequently breaks down as she lies on a bed in a hospital in Mannar, clutching her son of two-and-a-half years who has lost a leg. Her two other children are missing, residents in the region say.
     
    She was among the large number of Tamils escaping from Kilinochchi, the former political hub of the Tamil Tigers, last month when a shell probably fired by the army exploded, ripping apart her son's leg below the knee.
     
    Losing no time, she handed over her other two children, a six-month-old son and a daughter of seven years, to a friend as she tried to find help to save her bleeding and wailing son.
     
    She managed to reach the hospital in Mannar, where she remains warded. She has no idea where the other children are - and whether she will see them ever again.
     
    She also has no news of her husband, who left their home long ago after the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) ordered him to serve their civilian militia.
     
    Another patient at the hospital is a girl of 16 years who is left with only her upper torso. A resident of Mullaitivu district, both her legs came off in an aerial bombing seemingly targeted at the LTTE.
     
    There is also a 22-year-old woman, seven months pregnant. Half her body got burnt when her house in Kilinochchi caught fire in aerial bombing. Her breasts are charred.
     
    Remarkably, all these women are officially under detention at the hospital although some cannot even stir on their own. Since they came from areas the LTTE ruled for years, the doctors have been forbidden from discharging them.
     
    Human suffering shows no signs of abating in Sri Lanka's bleeding war. Most of the pain is being borne by Tamil civilians, many of whom are destitute after repeatedly fleeing their homes.
     
    As the Sri Lankan military remains poised to seize the last stretch of land held by the LTTE in Mullativu, civilians are fleeing from there in hundreds, desperate to get away from it all.
     
    Medical personnel say that many of the patients in Mannar are traumatised after seeing scores of bodies along the road as they fled the fighting. Many bodies were torn apart.
     
    Many of the injured, reports say, simply bled to death because no help was available.
     
    One woman told the doctor: 'It is worse than the tsunami. At that time many came to help us. Now there is nobody.'
     
    Hospitals in the northern districts of Mannar and Vavuniya every day receive dozens of wounded civilians. The really critical cases are sent to Anuradhapura, at the edge of the war zone.
     
    Most victims are children, women and elderly men. While the Vavuniya hospital has all kinds of patients, the ones at Mannar are mostly amputees - those without hands and legs.
     
    Once out of the conflict zone, and left with nothing but the clothes they are in, the injured are dependent on the military and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) for survival.
     
    There appears to be no precise count of how many have been wounded in aerial bombings and shelling. Tamils from outside have no access to army-seized Kilincochi where hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Tamils from Mullaitivu have taken refuge.
     
    Civilians who have not been injured are taken to detention centres in Mannar, Vavuniya and Jaffna to find out if they are indeed non-combatants or LTTE fighters in disguise.
  • SLA turns first ‘safety zone’ into killing field, proposes new zone
    * 36 civilians killed and 76 wounded in latest attack on ‘safety zone’
     
    After relentlessly firing artillery shells and mortars into an area it unilaterally declared as ‘safety zone’ and killing and maiming scores of civilians, the Sri Lankan military has disbanded it and declared another part of LTTE controlled Vanni as ‘safety zone’.   
     
    The new ‘safety zone’ proposed by the Sri Lankan Army on February 2 is located between Chaalai and Mullaitheevu town along the coastal area.
    Sri Lankan military spokesperson Brig. Udaya Nanayakkara accused the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) of driving civilians out of the first ‘safety zone’, announced by the Sri Lankan Army on January 21, and proposed the new zone on the coast, pledging not to attack it.
     
    However, international agencies, health officials, local organisations have repeatedly blamed the targeted attacks by the Sri Lankan military on the original ‘safety zone’ for civilians leaving the area.
     
    In the latest attack on the original zone, on Monday February 9, three days prior to it being disbanded, thousands of civilians fled in all directions from the 'safety zone' as mortar, artillery and Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher (MBRL) rockets hit the entire area demarcated by the Colombo government as safe civilian refuge.
     
    At least 36 civilians were killed and 76 wounded throughout the day in Vallipunam, Chuthanthirapuram and in Maaththalan. The entire 100-houses-scheme located in Chuthanthirapuram was on fire following MBRL attack with shells that caused immediate fire, according to local sources.
     
    Many had fled the 100-houses-scheme already and the remaining stayed inside the bunkers throughout the barrage. The settlement, initially set up for refugees from Mannaaar, is located on Udaiyaarkaddu Chuthanthirapuram Road.

    Several thousand people had already fled the safety zone further into LTTE controlled areas. But, not all as most of the casualties were reported on the roads on Sunday.

    6 civilians were killed and 12 wounded when they were fleeing Chuthanthirapuram and Theavipuram. 4 dead bodies of civilians were brought to Chuthanthirapuram hospital.

    At least 16 civilians were killed in Maaththalan and 49 were reportedly wounded. Five members of a single family were among the victims, the reports said.

    7 civilians, including 3 children, were rushed to hospital with serious burn injuries following the artillery and MBRL barrage.

    3 more civilians were killed in Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF) attacks and 15 sustained injuries.
     
    Casualty figures from 100-houses-scheme was not known.
  • Fourth person self immolates in Tamil Nadu for Eelam Tamils
    Congress functionary Sirkazhi (Cheerkaazhi) Ravichandran, a 47-year-old father of two children, immolated himself on Saturday, February 7, to protest his party's inaction on the Eelam Tamils issue.
     
    He succumbed to hundred percent burn injuries and died a short while later at 3:45 p.m.
     
    Two days earlier, he had an altercation with the Union Minister Mani Shanker Aiyar blaming the Congress party for failing to stop the war in Sri Lanka. He had also told a couple of his friends about his decision in order to bring about a change in the attitude of the Congress.
     
    The Congress worker told the police in his dying declaration that he was unhappy with his party’s stand over the Eelam Tamils issue.
     
    In his affidavit to the Mayilaaduthu'rai magistrate, Ravichandran has stated that he was traumatized by the sorrow undergone by Eezham Tamils. "I feel extremely depressed that my party people have not come forward to help the Eezham Tamils who suffer so much. A ceasefire is an urgent requirement in Sri Lanka. Tamils should not be killed," he said.

    He also pointed out, "India can stop the war. But I am very distressed that India has not come forward to initiate any steps in this regard." On his death bed, Ravichandran dedicated his life to the Eelam Tamils.
     
    The incident sparked off protests and counter protests, especially in Chennai, where Congress workers blocked traffic.
     
    In Madurai, the home-cum-office of Congress MP Sudarsana Nachiappan was attacked and the party flag brought down.
     
    Tension prevailed at the hospital in Nagapattinam when the Congress workers clashed with the activists of the recently floated Sri Lankan Tamils Protection Movement, comprising of the Pattali Makkal Katchi, the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, the Communist Party of India and the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi.
     
    Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi appealed for calm and said everyone should jointly work for alleviation of the Sri Lankan Tamils problems.
     
    Triggered off by Muthukumar, four people have already committed self-immolation in response to the plight of Eelam Tamils in the last few days in Tamil Nadu.
  • Vanni Tamils face starvation
    The United Nations has warned hundreds of thousands of people, living in the war zone in the north-eastern Sri Lankan region of Vanni, are facing a food crisis.
     
    World Food Programme (WFP) says about one-quarter of a million people there are totally dependent on international aid agencies who are unable to gain access to the area.

    Sri Lankan military has sealed off Vanni to the outside world. The United Nations says about 250,000 civilians are trapped there. Aid agencies say they are unable to bring essential relief supplies to the people.

    Hundreds of civilians have been killed and many wounded in recent days
    and several Western countries have pressed the Sri Lankan government to declare a cease-fire to allow emergency relief to be provided to the people caught in the fighting and the injured civilians to be transported for treatment.
     
    Amnesty International has also called on both sides to declare a humanitarian cease-fire to allow civilians out and to let food, water and medical supplies be delivered to those who can't leave.

    "A quarter of a million people are suffering without adequate food and shelter while shells rain down upon them. Most of those who have managed to escape the conflict have not received adequate hospital treatment," said Yolanda Foster, a researcher at the London-based rights group.

    But the government has ruled out a cease-fire.

    The World Food Program has said that the entire population of the Vanni is facing a food crisis. Some 250,000 people there are completely dependent on humanitarian aid, but WFP said it has not been able to get a supply convoy into the conflict zone since January 16.

    "At present, the entire population of the Vanni is facing a food crisis due to continuous displacement, crop failure and recent floods," World Food Program spokeswoman, Emilia Casella said.
     
    "Their livelihood is almost completely lost, exacerbating the food insecurity and their coping mechanisms have been exhausted. There is complete dependency on humanitarian and food assistance for their survival."  

    A convoy that was supposed to enter during a 4-hour "humanitarian window" on Thursday, February 5, could not go because the agency did not receive the necessary clearance from government officials,
     
    "We don't have any more stocks to be distributed, and our staffs are essentially hiding at the moment," Casella said. WFP has 16 staff and 81 dependents in the Vanni area.
  • Congress, DMK protest in support of Tamils
    The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) formed an umbrella organisation, the Sri Lankan Tamils Welfare and Liberty Forum, to campaign demanding a political solution to the crisis in Sri Lanka.
     
    Following the launch of the forum on Saturday February 7, members of the forum took part in a rally. Addressing the meeting, state Finance Minister Anbazhagan said as of now there was no better option than pressing the Centre to intervene and stop the war and find a political solution to the problems of Sri Lankan Tamils.
     
    “Sri Lanka cannot ignore the voice of India, a big neighbour, if the Centre makes consistent efforts,” he said and explained that Chief Minister Karunanidhi was fully aware of the implications, which was why he was avoiding a confrontation, the Hindu newspaper reported.
     
    Anbazhagan further said that the DMK was not interested in weakening the Congress-led UPA government in Delhi as there was no guarantee that the new regime would listen to the views of Karunanidhi and protect the interests of the Tamils, the newspaper said.
     
    “We don’t want to lose the government in Tamil Nadu and we are equally firm that the Congress government guided by Sonia Gandhi should continue at the Centre,” said the Hindu quoting Anbazhagan.
     
    Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) president Thangkabalu addressing the participants said that the Congress and the DMK were working together to find a durable political solution to the Sri Lankan Tamils problem, said the newspaper.
     
    Dravidar Kazhagam leader K.Veeramani; Tamil Maanila Indian Union Muslim League leader K.M. Khader Mohideen; Jananayaka Munnetra Kazhagam leader Jagatrakshakan; and Gingee Ramachandran, MP, participated, according to the newspaper.
     
    On Wednesday, February 11, the forum met again to chalk out a plan of action for bringing peace and ensuring the safety of Sri Lankan Tamils.
     
    Addressing reporters after the meeting, PWD Minister Durai Murugan said that a sub-committee was formed to assist the forum, to prepare an action plan to end “human rights violations” in Sri Lanka, reported the Hindu.
     
    Murugan further said the committee felt that the Centre should be asked to bring to the notice of the United Nations the “annihilation of Tamils” and the sub-committee members would meet Ambassadors and High Commissioners of various countries either in New Delhi or Chennai, said the newspaper.
     
    A memorandum detailing “sufferings” of the Tamils would also be submitted to foreign diplomats and a drafting committee had been formed to prepare the memorandum to be submitted to the international bodies, Murugan added.
Subscribe to Sri Lanka