Diaspora

Taxonomy Color
red
  • Maoists quit Nepal government, demand PM's resignation

    Nepal was thrown into political limbo on Saturday after the Maoists quit the interim government of the newly republican nation and demanded the prime minister's resignation.

    Nepal's former Maoist rebels stormed out of the government late on Friday, accusing a rival party of clinging to power despite being defeated in landmark elections in the Himalayan country two months ago.

    "Prime Minister Girija Prasad Koirala must resign to open the way for the formation of a new government," senior Maoist official Dinanath Sharma told AFP after the ultra-leftists announced their resignations.

    Nepal abolished its monarchy three weeks ago, but the country's two most powerful parties -- the Maoists and the prime minister's Nepali Congress party -- have been unable to reach a deal on power-sharing.

    The Maoists, who dominate the new assembly elected in April, say they have the right to lead the government and choose a new president.

    They say the wrangling is preventing the assembly from starting work on its chief task of rewriting Nepal's constitution.

    "The constituent assembly has not been able to begin drafting a new constitution because of these power-sharing problems," said Sharma.

    Nepali Congress officials say Koirala -- regarded by many as the architect of a peace deal that ended a deadly civil war waged by the Maoists and led to the creation of the new republic -- deserves to be Nepal's first president.

    "The Maoist decision has shocked us, the political impasse has deepened but that doesn't mean we are out of solutions," said Nepali Congress spokesman Arjun Nasingh Khatri Chettri.

    The Congress, Nepal's oldest political party which has half as many seats as the Maoists in the 601-member assembly that will chart Nepal's political future, said the Maoists' move to leave the government was premature.

    "Talks with the Maoists were going positively and yet they resigned from the government just when we were nearing a conclusion," said the Congress spokesman.

    The president's role is a crucial one because the person occupying the office is expected to be commander of the armed forces.

    "This deadlock is creating uncertainty but we are always ready to reach a consensus through mutual understanding," said Maoist official Sharma.

    The Congress official was also hopeful a breakthrough would be reached after discussions.

    "The only option we have is to resolve all political issues through dialogue. We hope to come to a logical conclusion in the next few days," said Khatri Chettri.

    The end of Nepal's monarchy late last month was the culmination of a rocky peace process between the former rebels, whose "People's War" claimed at least 13,000 lives, and mainstream political parties.

    The two sides united in late 2005 after now-deposed king Gyanendra seized direct control of the impoverished nation, an unpopular move that ultimately led to the demise of the 240-year-old monarchy.

  • Thousands pay their last respects to Thangamma Appakkuddi

    More than five thousand people gathered together at Thellippazhai on Monday to pay their last respects to the mortal remains of Thangamma Appakuddi, the veteran religious and cultural personality of Eelam Tamils.

     

    Thangamma Appakkuddi, passed away at noon on June 15 at the age of 84, after bedridden for a few weeks in a stage of coma at the Jaffna Teaching Hospital.

     

    Apart from her religious leadership, Thangamma Appakkuddi, was a philanthropist and a social worker, caring for the much needed requirements of women and children in a war-torn society. She was an institution by herself.

     

    Born on 7th January, 1925, Thangamma Appakkuddi, had her early education at Ramanathan College, Chunnaakam, and became a trained teacher in 1945.

     

    She studied Tamil and Saivaism in the traditional schools and became a Pundit in 1952 and a Saiva Pulavar (Madras) in 1958.

     

    She was a popular teacher for 31 years of which the last 12 years were spent at the Union College, Thellippazhai. She retired from government service in 1976.

     

    She became inclined towards Saivaism and Tamil at a much earlier age, remained a spinster and devoted her entire life to the cause of her ideals.

     

    Known as Pandithai Thangamma Appakkuddi, she was gracing the temples of Jaffna as early as 1950's and 60's, with her unique lectures in her deep and resonant voice captivating the masses.

     

    The early 70's marked a big transition in her life. She became involved in the construction of a temple dedicated to the martial goddess Durga in her native place Thellippazhai. The temple that existed there before her times was a humble structure with a thatched front.

     

    It was essentially the spirit of Thangamma Appaakkuddi, which was behind the upsurge of the cult of Durga and for the temple to become a big and leading religious establishment among Eelam Tamils.

     

    In her later years, she became known Sivath-thamizhch-chelvi (the lady of God Siva's Tamil) and Thurkaa-thuranthari (one who is in the service of Durga). She became a preceptor whom the people were looking upon for religious leadership. But, she remained a rational person with a spiritual and social mission.

     

    Her temple establishment became an epicentre for a multitude of social and cultural activities. The Thurkaapuram Makalir Illam, set up by her for destitute female children was a unique institution by itself. The temple also assisted the sick, elderly and helpless refugees.

     

    She was also a philanthropist in establishing libraries and assisting valuable publications.

     

    Recognising her academic achievements and service to culture and society, the University of Jaffna, bestowed her with an honorary doctorate in 1998.

     

    The final farewell event was held in the Common Hall outside Thellippazhai Thurkkai Amman Kovil, the day after her death with Mr. Aaruthirumurkan presiding over the event.

     

    Most of the schools in the peninsula were closed before lunch interval while all schools, shops, private and public institutions in Valikaamam north were closed before noon, enabling all to attend the funeral.

     

    Mavai Senathirajah, Tamil National Alliance (TNA) Jaffna district parliamentarian, Jaffna High Court Magistrate R. T. Vignarajah, Jaffna Government Agent (GA) K. Ganesh and Prof. N. Shanmugalingan, Vice-chancellor of Jaffna University, were some of the dignitaries who paid tribute to the lady who was looked upon as religious beacon by Tamils from all walks of life.

     

    “That Tamils should attain self-governance and build up a life of fulfilment aided with economic development, was the noble ideal of Father Chelva and Thangamma Appakuddi, until her death acted in keeping to the same goal, striving to achieve it,” Mavai Senathirajah said, in his tribute address.

     

    “Besides her extraordinary religious and social service, she relentlessly prayed for the deliverance, peaceful life and prosperity of the Tamil Nation, a fact that I realized in the several meetings I had with her,” he added.

     

    “Thurkaa-thuranthari, had been a model personality for me for a long time and we pledge to emulate her example in our service to the people,” K. Ganesh, Jaffna GA, said, paying homage to Pandithai Thangamma Appakuddi.

     

    Thousanbds of members of the public patiently waited in long queues to pay their last respects.

     

    Representatives of Saiva Assembly, Saiva Organizations, principals, teachers, students, teacher trainees and Jaffna University students were among those queueing to pay their last respects, as were several social and religious dignitaries.

     

    The sight of the orphan girls, brought up by Saiva-tamil-chelvi in the Thurkaapuram Makalir Illam (Girls Home), weeping uncontrollably when her remains was about to be taken for cremation, was heart-wrenching, observers reported.

     

    The last journey of the beloved lady of light began around 2:30 p.m. with the students leading in two rows on either side of the Thellipazhai-Kaangkeasanthurai road and the mourners following the vehicle that carried the casket.

     

    The remains of the lady were cremated at Kadduppeddi crematorium in her native village, Thellippazhai, around 4:00 p.m.

     

     

  • 15, 000 Army deserters at large

    The Sri Lankan Army has a problem with desertion.

     

    Currently there are about 15,000 army deserters at large. But late last year, it was worse, with about 20,000 deserters on the books.

     

    In the past, the army has managed to get deserters to return by offering an amnesty.

     

    The most recent one, that was available the first two weeks of May, was extended another two weeks because the initial response was so great.

     

    The army expects to get about a third of its wayward soldiers back.

     

    The main cause of the desertion is the 25 years of fighting with the Liberation Tigers, which has killed over 70,000 people.

     

    About a third are Tamils (18 percent of the population), while most of the rest are soldiers.

     

    Since the army is only about 150,000 strong, and the heaviest fighting has taken place in the last decade, it's no wonder so many recruits changed their minds.

     

    The Sri Lankan army has always been an all-volunteer force.

     

    But once you are in, you are obliged to stay in as long as your contract specifies. If you want to leave before that time is up, you are classified as a deserter.

     

    The army does not make a big effort to hunt down deserters and bring them back. That would cause civil unrest.

     

    A better solution has been victory in combat. And that's what the army has been doing for the past year.

     

    Nothing succeeds like success.

     

    The generals have been keeping army casualties down, while taking down lots of the enemy. So a record number of deserters are returning.

     

  • World Bank discusses US$900 million assistance for Sri Lanka

    Support for infrastructure-led growth, lagging regions, and high quality service delivery is the focus of the World Bank Group’s Country Assistance Strategy (CAS) for Sri Lanka for the period July 2008 to June 2011.

     

    The envisaged lending package of US$900 million for the Sri Lanka CAS was endorsed by the World Bank’s Executive Director at a meeting on June 5.

     

    The CAS is aligned with Mahinda Chintana, the Government’s 10-year economic development framework which aims at accelerating growth, with particular emphasis on equitable development.

     

    The strategy is focused on three objectives.

     

    The first is to expand economic opportunities in lagging regions to achieve more balanced growth by supporting rehabilitation of roads, irrigation networks, and water supply.

     

    Second, the CAS centers on improving the investment climate and competitiveness to encourage private sector investments and growth.

     

    The third objective is to enhance quality services and accountability to improve education, health, social safety nets, and environmental protection.

     

    A substantive share of the resources during this CAS period is devoted to roads, particularly the provincial roads to improve inter connectivity among regions to facilitate faster development in the lagging regions”.

                                         

    The design of the CAS is based on extensive consultations both with the Government and with a broad cross-section of Sri Lankan society across many parts of the country.“

     

    The assistance strategy aims to sustain the impressive poverty reduction that Sri Lanka has achieved the last five years, “said World Bank Country Director for Sri Lanka Naoko Ishii.

     

    “The CAS is designed to deliver positive development outcomes in poor and underserved areas, including the conflict – affected North and the East.”

     

    The CAS will systematically ensure conflict sensitivity in design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of’ Bank-funded activities.

     

     The aim is to encourage members of different ethnic group to work together around common goals in community driven development initiatives,

     

    The CAS also notes the importance of enhancing macroeconomic stability for achieving higher long term economic growth and for enabling Sri Lanka to better meet the challenges of the recent steep increase in international commodity prices.

     

    The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the Bank Group’s private sector arm, plays an important role in the Bank’s strategy by providing long-term financing and business advice for Sri Lankan companies.

     

     During this CAS implementation period, IFC will increasingly reach out to second-tier, smaller clients and help develop the domestic financial market, In addition, the IFC will continue to provide advisory services through the South-Fast Asia Enterprise Development Facility, a five-year, multi-donor trust find established especially for this purpose.

     

    The credits are from the International Development Association (IDA), the World Bank’s concessionary lending arm, and have 20 years to maturity with a 10-year grace period and zero interest.

  • Sri Lanka’s envoy urges UN call on British monarchy - paper

    Sri Lanka’s envoy to the United Nations Human Rights Council raised concerns over Britain’s monarchy, leading to the HRC stating in its report that the UK must "consider holding a referendum on the desirability or otherwise of a written constitution, preferably republican” British press reports said reported Saturday.

     

    The UN comments about the Queen were included at the request of the council’s Sri Lankan envoy, Dayan Jayatilleka, the Daily Telegraph and Daily Express newspapers reported.

     

    The monarchy costs each adult in Britain around 62p a year but even groups representing taxpayers said there was no case for getting rid of it.

     

    Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance in Britain, told the Telegraph: "With so many human rights abuses around the world the UN should be busy reporting on issues of starvation, execution and the denial of the vote to huge numbers of people around the world.”

  • Rajapaksa lauds military, promises victory soon

    Speaking at the National War Heroes Day celebrations at Sri Jayawardenapura - Kotte, on June 7, President Mahinda Rajapaksa promised that “task of safeguarding democracy and restoring peace” will soon be accomplished.

     

    As we remember and honour our Heroes of War, on behalf of the country and the nation, we pledge to complete the task of safeguarding democracy and restoring peace for which they sacrificed their lives and assure you all that the day is not far when we shall accomplish this,” the President said.

     

    Launching an attack on the media and the international community, the Sri Lankan President also called on the opposition, unions and other to not “betray the nation”.

     

    While it was “possible, if necessary, ... to use the armed forces to erect fences and barricades ..., how can we fence or barricade the mouths of those who hate the country?” the President asked.

     

    “I ask all political parties including the opposition, and various other organizations not to betray the victory we have won as a nation. If anyone tries to destroy this, it would amount to destroying a great mansion built upon the aspirations of the people,” he said.

     

    The President said that though politicians were able to respond to allegations, “at the theatres of war at Jaffna or Muhamalai, the troops who come forward ready to sacrifice their lives facing up to enemy bullets, and their officers, have no opportunity to respond to false charges and allegations.”

     

    “When we began we had to make a great commitment to build the morale of our troops. It is not possible to win a war with weapons alone.”

     

    “For this it is necessary for the soldier who goes into battle to have trust and confidence in his leadership. In order to build their morale we had to resolve many problems affecting then, such as service conditions, weapons training, suitable housing, and education for their children,” he said.

     

     By facing up to the international forces that were attempting to make us withdraw the steps we had taken against terrorism, and by replying to the false charges they made, we showed that we were not ready to betray our troops,” he said.

     

    “From the time it began, the battle against terrorism, against Eelam; this battle to develop the country, has been pulled back to serve the interest of various forces. This was due diverse pressures such as international opinion or the interest of those in this country who seek to profit from the slogan of peace,” he said.

     

    “But we have not made our troops take a single step forward for political reasons and also they have not taken any step back due to any such interests or pressures, and will not do so in the future too,” the President said.

     

    Noting that the memorial was near the location of the legislature, the President said “We considered it important to have this memorial to our War Heroes located near our supreme legislature because of the service rendered by our War Heroes to safeguard parliamentary democracy and the rights of the people.”

     

    “Now, the representatives of the people will also have the opportunity to pay their respects to the heroes who are protecting democracy before they enter the shrine of democracy,” he said.

     

    Praising the Sri Lankan soldiers, President Rajapaksa said: “The time is not very far when our War Heroes will be honoured not only in our country but throughout the world. Our War Heroes are fighting with sacrifice of their lives to mark a full stop in Sri Lanka to international terrorism.”

     

    “There was a time when no one thought our War Heroes will be able to give this example to the world. Our War Heroes are not only engaged in battling terrorism, they are also engaged in a great operation to ensure and provide the human rights and the necessities of the people,” he said.

  • Plucked peace flower

    Out of Sri Lanka's nettle of war the flower of peace can be plucked with a free and fair referendum on Tamil statehood. That was an unwritten insight of U.S. Ambassador Robert Blake in a recent interview with the Sunday Observer newspaper. More on that later.

     

    A grisly civil war between Sri Lanka's Tamils and the Sinhalese-dominated government of Sir Lanka (GOSL) has convulsed the island nation for more than three decades. Tens of thousands have been slaughtered. Hundreds of thousands have been displaced. Government sponsored assassinations, kidnappings, disappearances, rape and arbitrary detentions have become commonplaces. Four Tamil members of parliament have been murdered. Tamil journalists are regularly detained, tortured or disappeared. On Feb. 2, 2007, the Asian Human Rights Commission found: "A disappearance every five hours [in Sri Lanka] is a result of deliberate removal of all legal safeguards against illegal detention, murder and illegal disposal of bodies."

     

    The former Sri Lankan minister for foreign affairs similarly protested in the Sunday Leader (Jan. 28, 2007): "Kidnappings, abductions, and killings have become common incidents. No matter who does it, as a government we are responsible." The GOSL was expelled from the United Nations Human Rights Council, after it renounced a 2002 Cease Fire Agreement in favor of a military solution entailing the extermination of the Tamil Tigers.

     

    But the peace solution to Sri Lanka's descent into hell was discerned by Mr. Blake - even if unwittingly - in an interview published in the Sunday Observer on May 25. The subtext affirmed the right of the Tamil people to determine their own political destiny without dictation by Tamil Tiger leader, Velupillai Prabharkaran, or by any other person or organization. The ambassador conjectured that the Tamil people "are not seeking an independent Tamil Eelam which Prabharkan is seeking." Indeed, he speculated that in a free and fair statehood referendum, a staggering 95 percent of Tamils would favor a political solution within a united Sri Lanka.

     

    But the ambassador knows that neither the United States nor international practice accepts statehood determinations based on political stargazing, but on free and fair referenda that reliably express the sentiments of the majority. That is the core meaning of self-determination. East Timor, Eritrea and Montenegro are recent examples. (Kosovo declared its independence by parliamentary vote).

     

    The civil war in Sudan ended with a guaranteed self-determination vote in the south in 2011. In Canada, Quebec has twice voted on independence, and rejected the option twice. The United States permits Puerto Rico an independence vote, which has never attracted more than a tiny 4 percent.

     

    A Tamil referendum on statehood in Sri Lanka could be organized and conducted on the model of the United Nations Mission in East Timor established by Security Council Resolution 1246 and operated from June to September 1999. Its mandate was to organize and conduct a referendum on the basis of a direct, secret and universal ballot, in order to ascertain whether the East Timorese wished special autonomy within the unitary Republic of Indonesia, or East Timor's separation. Virtually every East Timorese voted for independence.

     

    Pending the Tamil statehood vote, the contemplated U.N. Mission in Sri Lanka would be given delegated power from the GOSL to exercise all legislative and executive authorities, including administration of justice, in Tamil demarcated areas in the north and east, where all military hostilities from whatever source would cease. The Tamil Tigers would decommission but not surrender their arms. Human-rights observers would be invited to monitor the referendum. Freedom of speech, press and political association would be protected.

     

    A Tamil statehood referendum would be superfluous if Mr. Blake accurately assessed that 95 percent of Tamils would vote to remain in a unitary Sri Lankan state. But his assessment probably overlooked odious landmarks in Sri Lanka's history that might incline Tamils towards independence:

     

    (1) The Citizenship Act, which denied civic and political rights to 1 million Tamils of Indian descent and relegated the remaining Tamils to a Sinhalese majority tyranny.

     

    (2) The revocation of constitutional safeguards for the Tamil minority in the new 1972 Republican Constitution imposed without popular ratification.

     

    (3) The statement of S.J.V. Chelvanayakam, leader of the Tamil United Liberation Front, after winning a byelection in 1974 where he sought a mandate for Tamil statehood: "The National Convention of the Tamil United Liberation Front meeting at Pannakam ... on the 14th day of May 1976, hereby declares that the Tamils of Ceylon ... are a nation distinct and apart from the Sinhalese and this Convention announced to the world that the Republican Constitution of 1972 has made the Tamils a slave nation ruled by the new colonial masters, the Sinhalese, who are using the power they have wrongly usurped to deprive the Tamil nation of its territory, language, citizenship, economic life, opportunities of employment and education, thereby destroying all attributes of nationhood of the Tamil people."

     

    (4) The statement of President J.R. Jayawardene to the Daily Telegraph on July 11, 1983, while state-organized race rioters were slaughtering Tamils by the thousands and displacing more than 100,000: "I am not worried about the opinion of the Tamil people ... now we cannot think of them, not about their lives or their opinion ... [T]he more you put pressure in the north, the happier the Sinhala people will be here. ... Really if I starve the Tamils out, the Sinhalese people will be happy."

     

    The more things have changed for the Tamils since Mr. Jayawardene, the more they have stayed the same. A free and fair referendum on Tamil statehood is the sole plausible strategy for bringing peace to both Tamils and Sinhalese.

     

    Bruce Fein is a constitutional and international lawyer with Bruce Fein & Associates and an attorney with Tamils for Justice, an organization which supports a Tamil statehood referendum.

     

  • Suicide blast claims 12 police

    A motorcycle rider detonated an explosive in front of the office of the Senior Superintendent of the Police on Monday June 16, killing 12 Sri Lankan policemen and himself, and injuring about 40 others.

     

    Later the number killed was modified to 16, CNN reported, calling it “at least the second deadly explosion in Sri Lanka this month”.

     

    Four of the wounded were civilians. Two schoolchildren also sustained minor injuries in the blast.

     

    The attacker rode into a police barrack while the group of policemen were emerging from the office located along the A-9 road, press reports said.

     

    "Twelve people were killed ... from a suicide blast in Vavuniya town," military spokesman Udaya Nanayakkara said, adding several schoolchildren were also among the wounded.

     

    Nanayakkara said a suicide bomber riding a motorcycle had blown himself in front of a police station in the town.

     

    The Ministry of Defence, Public Security, Law and Order said on its website that the suicide blast occurred around 7:10 a.m. as the police were leaving a police facility go on duty.

     

    Other reports quoted police as saying the officers had gathered outside to await assignment details when the attacker drove into the group with a motorcycle.

     

    The most senior police official was not in the building at the time of the blast which occurred during the morning rush hour, a policeman in Vavuniya told AFP.

     

    The Ministry of Defence said the 12 police personnel killed included three women police constables.

     

    Vavuniya, located 158 miles (255 km) from the capital Colombo, is the northernmost town under government control. It borders the LTTE held region.

     

    The ministry blamed the attack on the Liberation Tigers for the attack.

  • Symptom, not the Problem

    It has now become widely accepted internationally that human rights abuses by the Sri Lankan security forces and allied paramilitaries are widespread and routine. Sri Lanka has come under intense criticism by international human rights groups as well as some leading Western states. The Tamil Diaspora, which has for the past quarter century been protesting and lobbying international capitals, has understandably gained some comfort from the strongly worded criticism from some host states. However, firstly, this should not be taken as a reduction in support for the Sinhala-dominated state. Secondly, and more importantly, we should not equate ending Colombo's rights abuses with ending Sri Lanka's oppression of the Tamil people. Abuses are only an element of oppression and only a symptom of state racism.

     

    For sixty years, the Sinhala-dominated state has discriminated against and violently repressed the Tamils. In 1972 the Constitution was changed to set up a permanent racial hierarchy that posits the Sinhala-Buddhist majority as having a 'first and foremost' place in the island with the other minorities as subordinate. In short, Sri Lanka is deemed a Sinhala country in which the minorities - Tamils, Upcountry Tamils and Muslims - are allowed to stay, provided they understand their place in this hierarchy.

     

    Since independence from Britain, Tamil protests against the deepening Constitutional and legislative privileging of the Sinhalese have been met with increasingly violent state repression. This led inexorably - from Tamil demands for equal treatment, to demands for federal autonomy - to insistence on outright independence. That was in 1977. It was when state repression intensified thereafter that militancy emerged. It was following the 1983 anti-Tamil pogrom - the worst of five or more such mob attacks - that the Tamil armed struggle turned into a fully fledged war of national liberation.

     

    There are several dimensions to state repression of the Tamils. There are the human rights abuses - murder, 'disappearance', torture and rape by the security forces and allied paramilitaries. There is the violent and militarized Sinhala colonization of the Tamils' homeland. For example, whilst the Eastern province had less than 9% Sinhalese in 1948, by 1981 (i.e. before the 1983 pogrom and the mass displacement and killings of Tamils throughout the war) state-backed colonization had ensured Sinhalese comprised 30%. Then there is the way in which the Sinhala military - assisted by the West-led international community - has waged war: massacres of Tamils, mass displacement of Tamils (often followed by settling of Sinhalese in abandoned lands), indiscriminate bombardments of Tamil population concentrations and embargos on food and medicine. Sinhala racism manifests in almost every state decision. For example, after the tsunami, almost all foreign aid was diverted to the Sinhala south, rather than the Tamil and Muslim dominated Northeast.

     

    None of all this is new to the international community; it has been integral to the Tamil-Sinhala relationship for decades. Quite apart from the incessant lobbying by Tamil expatriates (most of whom arrived in the West as fleeing refugees), the regular reports from Western embassies, research by countless academics, reports from international human rights groups and media reports, have chronicled the Tamils' persecution in detail. Yet, prioritizing its geopolitical and economic interests, the West-led international community has aided and abetted this Sinhala repression - whilst sometimes making much noise about rights abuses (and usually when the Sinhala leaders resist external interests).

     

    There are specific consequences to focusing on human rights as opposed to state oppression. To begin with, reducing the Tamils' suffering to human rights is tantamount to rejecting the Tamils' demand for self-determination; this is because the way to address human rights, in international eyes, is to reform the Sri Lankan state and not 'divide' the country. Secondly, the massive military and economic assistance being extended to the Sri Lankan state is justified under this logic of reform. Supplying further training to the Sri Lankan military means it will be 'more disciplined' and 'less likely to commit abuses', the argument goes. Strengthening the economic base of the Sri Lankan state means 'reducing ethnic tensions'. The state should not be weakened by sanctions, but 'encouraged', by giving it even more aid, to 'improve' its 'governance', its 'accountability' and so on. In short, the logic of 'human rights abuses' thus makes strengthening the Sri Lankan state the solution to Tamils' 'grievances'.

     

    This is why when Tamils protest using the language of 'oppression', racism' and 'genocide', the international community responds in the language of 'stopping human rights abuses'. Which is why the Tamils are told to forget about self-determination or Eelam and to focus on making the state 'more accountable'. This is also why, when we speak of 'state repression', the international community instead blames the 'government' - the problem, we are told, is the Rajapaksa regime, not the state per se. Thus, it is to justify and facilitate the ongoing international support for the Sri Lankan state that Tamils are being encouraged to agitate in Western capitals - again, provided they use the language of 'human rights', and not that of 'national self-determination'. In short, our role is to plead with the international community to take up our 'grievances' and to become our 'representatives' vis-à-vis the Sri Lankan state.

     

    Which leads to the question of Tamils' support for the Liberation Tigers. When the crisis in Sri Lanka is reduced to 'human rights abuses' and the solution is deemed to 'strengthening and reforming the state', there is no room for armed struggle against the state (i.e. 'terrorism') irrespective of the form of the oppression. Which is why the Europ-ean Union, when banning the LTTE in 2006, insisted the move 'was against the LTTE and not the Tamil people.' This is why the 'War on Terror' and 'a solution acceptable to all Sri Lankans' are deemed to be one and the same.

     

    'Human rights abuses' therefore have starkly different meanings for the Tamils and the international community. For the Tamils, the atrocities inflicted on them by the Sri Lankan security forces are a symptom, an indicator of the racist logic of the Sinhala-dominated state; for the international community, they are the problem itself i.e. end the abuses and thus solve the crisis.

     

    The demand for Tamil Eelam emerged out of the impossibility of reforming the Sri Lankan state; i.e. the failure over decades of Tamil efforts to bring about change within a united state dominated by a numerical ethnic majority. The Tamil armed struggle emerged out of the violent, militarized repression of this Tamil demand. In the 21st century, the Tamils have been promised international action- most recently under the logic of 'responsibility to protect' - to ensure the Sri Lankan state ends its oppression. But nothing like this has happened. Instead, the Sri Lankan state continues to receive increasing international assistance - military, financial and political.

     

    The point here, as we have stated before, is not that human rights are not of value - as a community that has suffered abuses for decades, few appreciate these more. Rather, it is to say human rights cannot be separated from the central political issue - in our case self-determination and liberation from state oppression. To do so is to obscure and - given the dynamics of international action in Sri Lanka - in fact to propagate Sri Lanka's oppression.

  • Israel agrees Gaza Cease Fire

    Israel has approved a ceasefire to end months of bitter clashes with the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas in Gaza, Israeli officials have confirmed.

    Under the terms of the truce, which is set to begin on Thursday, Israel will ease its blockade on the Gaza Strip. At the same time, talks to release an Israeli soldier held by Hamas would intensify, an Israeli official said.

    Hamas, which controls Gaza, says it is confident that all militants will abide by the agreement. Hamas seized control of Gaza in June 2007, driving out forces loyal to Fatah, the political faction led by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

    Since then, Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the international community have sought to isolate Hamas. For Hamas, the ceasefire agreement is an acknowledgement that Israel's economic blockade of Gaza is hurting its administration and is having a huge detrimental impact on Gaza's population, says the BBC's Wyre Davies in Jerusalem.

    Border crossings

    The decision to approve the ceasefire was made by Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defence Minister Ehud Barak, following the return of a defence official from Cairo, where he held talks with Egyptian mediators.

    The truce is scheduled to begin at 0600 (0300 GMT) on Thursday, and should bring an end to rocket attacks from within Gaza and ease the humanitarian situation inside the Palestinian territory. However, there are still many obstacles to long-term peace, with both sides warning that the truce will collapse if it is violated, our correspondent says.

    An Israeli government spokesman said it wanted the ceasefire to succeed. "Thursday will be the beginning, we hope, of a new reality where Israeli citizens in the south will no longer be on the receiving end of continuous rocket attacks," Mark Regev said.

    According to a breakdown of the deal released by Hamas, Israel will ease its restrictions on Gaza crossings with Israel on Friday morning, followed by the bigger commercial crossings next week. After two weeks, talks will start involving Israel, Hamas, the Palestinian Authority and the EU on reopening the Rafah crossing into Egypt.

    An Israeli security source told Israel Radio that negotiations on the return of captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit were expected to resume with a few days. He said that if progress was achieved, Israel would have to reach a decision regarding the release of Palestinian prisoners.

    As part of the deal, Egypt has also committed to stop the smuggling of arms and weapons from its territory into Gaza, Israeli officials said.

  • Police arrest 33 suspected Tamil Tigers across Italy

    Police in Naples said Wednesday that the suspects were picked up in cities including Rome, Genoa, Bologna, Naples and Palermo at the end of a two-year investigation. Two more were being sought in Naples.

    Police believe the suspects, all Sri Lankan citizens, extorted money from their fellow nationals in the various cities and sent it home to finance the rebel group.

    Luigi Bonacura of the Naples police said the operation effectively dismantles the Tamil Tiger network in Italy.

    The Tamil Tiger rebels have fought since 1983 to create an independent homeland for Sri Lanka's ethnic minority Tamils.

  • Exams reveal abuse, torture of detainees

    The Massachusetts-based Physicians for Human Rights reached that conclusion after two-day clinical evaluations of 11 former detainees, who had been held at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and in Afghanistan.

    The detainees were never charged with crimes."We found clear physical and psychological evidence of torture and abuse, often causing lasting suffering," said Dr. Allen Keller, a medical evaluator for the study.

    In a 121-page report, the doctors' group said that it uncovered medical evidence of torture, including beatings, electric shock, sleep deprivation, sexual humiliation, sodomy and scores of other abuses.

    The report is prefaced by retired U.S. Major Gen. Antonio Taguba, who led the Army's investigation into the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal in 2003."There is no longer any doubt that the current administration committed war crimes," Taguba says. "The only question is whether those who ordered torture will be held to account."

    Over the years, reports of abuses at Abu Ghraib and allegations of torture at Guantanamo prompted the Bush administration to deny that the U.S. military tortures detainees.

    Since only 11 detainees were examined "the findings of this assessment cannot be generalized to the treatment of all detainees in U.S. custody," the report says.

    However, the incidents documented are consistent with findings of other investigations into government treatment, "making it reasonable to conclude that these detainees were not the only ones abused, but are representative of a much larger number of detainees subjected to torture and ill treatment while in U.S. custody."

    Four of the men evaluated were arrested in or taken to Afghanistan between late 2001 and early 2003 and later were sent to Guantanamo Bay, where they were held for an average of three years before being released without charge, the report says. The other seven were detained in Iraq in 2003 and released within a year, the report says.

    All the subjects told examiners that they were subjected to multiple forms of torture or ill treatment that "often occurred in combination over a long period of time," the report says.

    While the report presents synopses of the detainees' backgrounds based on interviews with them, the authors did not have access to the detainees' medical histories. Therefore, there's no way to know whether any of the inmates may have had medical or mental problems before being detained.

    Among the ex-detainees was an Iraqi in his mid-40s, identified only as Laith, whom U.S. soldiers took into custody in October 2003 and who was released from Abu Ghraib in June 2004. According to the report, Laith was subjected to sleep deprivation, electric shocks and threats of sexual abuse to himself and his family.

    "They took off even my underwear. They asked me to do some movements that make me look in a very bad way so they can take photographs. ... They were trying to make me look like an animal," Laith told examiners, according to the report.

    According to the report, Laith said the most "painful" experiences involved threats to his family: "And they asked me, 'Have you ever heard voices of women in this prison?' I answered, 'Yes.' They were saying, 'Then you will hear your mothers and sisters when we are raping them.' "

    The examiners concluded in the report that "Laith appears to have suffered severe and lasting physical and psychological injuries as a result of his arrest and incarceration at Abu Ghraib prison."

    Another detainee, Youssef, was detained by U.S. soldiers nearly seven years ago when he tried to enter Afghanistan from neighboring Pakistan without a passport, the report says. He initially was held in an Afghan prison, where he describes "being stripped naked, being intimidated by dogs, being hooded and being thrown against the wall on repeated occasions," the report says.

    A few months later, he was taken to the Guantanamo Bay facility, where he was subjected to interrogators who would enter his cell and force him to lie on the floor with his hands tied behind his back to his feet, the report says.

    Youssef said the interrogators wanted him to confess of involvement with the Taliban, the report says.Based on its investigation, the report calls on the U.S. government to issue a formal apology to detainees subject to torture and ill treatment by the military since fall 2001 in Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere.

    The rights group also demands that the Bush administration:

    • "Repudiate all forms of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment";

    • Establish an independent commission to investigate and report publicly the circumstances of detention and interrogation at U.S.-run prisons in Afghanistan, Iraq and Guantanamo Bay;

    Hold individuals involved in torturing detainees accountable through criminal and civil processes; and

    • Monitor thoroughly the conditions at U.S.-run prisons all over the world.

  • Why Tamils demand independence

    Our demand for independence is no mere whim; it has emerged as a direct consequence of a specific, prolonged history of racially-motivated oppression and violence by the Sinhala-dominated Sri Lankan state.

     

    For over sixty years since the British gave the island independence as a single entity, the Sinhala-dominated state has implemented a series of racist laws, including a constitution (in 1972 and 1975) that places their language and religion as ‘first and foremost’.

     

    Our demands for equality have been met by state violence and state-backed mob violence. For three decades, our peaceful demonstrations, civil protests and  hungerstrikes were met by police and army violence, racial riots and ever-more discriminatory laws.

     

    It was only after three decades of peaceful agitation, that armed resistance to Sinhala domination began.

     

    The Tamils of Sri Lanka form a nation of people. We are an ethnically distinct population with our own language, culture, traditions and history.

     

    The Sinhalese of Sri Lanka also constitute a nation with their own language, culture, traditions and history, distinct from us. We therefore consider the Tamils and Sinhalese as distinct and equal nations. We do not consider ourselves superior or inferior to the Sinhalese.

     

    The traditional Tamil homeland is in the Northeast of the island of Sri Lanka. The Sinhala homeland is in the south of the island.

     

    Until colonial rulers arrived, there was no single form of united rule over the island. It was only under the British colonial rule that the different parts of the island were turned into a single administration, based in a capital in the south – Colombo.

     

    The single state of (Ceylon, later renamed) Sri Lanka which was given independence in 1948 is therefore a colonial construction. It is as ‘fabricated’ as those other countries which received independence from colonialism with ruler-straight borders and artificial governments.

     

    As we are a distinct nation, with our own homeland, we have the right to self-determination under the UN principles established to end colonial rule.

     

    Though as a nation entitled to self-rule, we initially did not seek independence, but sought accommodation with the Sinhalese in equality and justice.

     

    But within eight years of independence, the Sinhala majority, using the principle of ‘one-person, one vote’ chose a government that made Sinhala the official language, instead of English. For example, Tamils had to learn Sinhala to get jobs, especially in the state.

     

    Since then, the two largest parties (which are Sinhala-dominated) in the island have competed for votes by promising more and more Sinhala chauvunist policies (i.e. ethnic ‘outbidding’).

     

    In the late sixties and seventies, university admission for Tamil youth was sharply reduced, by declaring our districts as ‘privileged’ and thus requiring Tamil students to score higher marks for university entrance than students from Sinhala areas.

     

    In 1962, the military began keeping Tamils out, the beginning of an ‘ethnically pure’ army: Sri Lanka’s military is 99% Sinhala. The army’s regiments are named after Sinhala kings, which in their mythology, defeated Tamil kings. The military’s rituals are Buddhist.

     

    Five times since independence, there have been big state-organized Sinhala mob violence against the Tamil people: 1956, 1958, 1977, 1981 and 1983. Thousands of people have been massacred, many tortured and raped.

     

    The most extensive was in July 1983, when at least three thousand people died when Tamils in the south were ethnically cleansed and driven to the north.

     

    Since the Tamil armed struggle began in the early eighties, as a form of resistance to racial domination and subjugation, the country has been at war.

     

    The way the Sinhala-dominated state wages its war to destroy the Tamil Tigers shows how it views the Tamils.

     

    Against areas the government does not control, it uses indiscriminate, mass aerial and artillery bombardment, blockade of food and medicine resulting in widespread starvation and suffering.

     

    In areas it controls, it uses abductions, executions, torture, rape. The targets are Tamil politicians and party workers, journalists, civil society activists, aid workers (including Christian and Hindu priests), etc.

     

    The Tamils have been told by the international community that instead of seeking independence by exercising our right to self-determination, we should seek a solution within Sinhala-dominated Sri Lanka.

     

    But the Tamils have had a long history of being oppressed; sixty painful years. Our efforts to be accommodative, to share power with the Sinhalese have been rejected and we have suffered ever more repression and violence.

     

    The demand for an independent state emerged in 1976 when the Tamil parties united into the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF). In 1977, the TULF won all the seats they contested in the Northeast by a landslide, receiving a resounding mandate for an independent state.

     

    We have never abandoned our desire to be independent.

     

    In 2001, the four major Tamil parties (which included the TULF and those militant groups which gave up arms) again united into the Tamil National Alliance (TNA). It 2001 and 2004, the TNA contested elections on a platform supporting Tamil independence and won with landslide again.

     

    Since the mid-nineties, Tamils have sought refuge from the oppression and the brutal war of the Sinhala-dominated state and fled to Europe, Canada and Australia. In all these places, Tamil Diaspora has continued to demand independence.

     

    In short, the demand for independent Tamil Eelam has broad, enduring support.

     

    With every passing decade, despite the ferocious violence and repression unleashed by the Sinhala state with international support, our determination to be free, to rule ourselves as equals with other peoples of the world, has grown stronger.

     

    In the name of equality and justice, we ask for your support.

     

     

     

  • Diaspora Tamils rally in support of Eelam

    Eelam Tamils in the Diaspora countries this week began a series of rallies in support of the Tamils’ right to Self-Determination.

     

    The rallies, titled 'Pongku Thamil,' (meaning 'Tamil Upsurge'), are intended as Tamil mobilising through cultural programmes. It resumes a major plank of Tamil political activity.

     

    The very first Pongku Thamil was held on January 17, 2001 by university students in defiance of the Sri Lankan military occupying Jaffna and despite the ongoing fighting in the peninsula.

     

    The Pongku Thamizh movement was initiated by university students in the Tamil homeland  to serve as a demonstration of the motivation and defiant will of the Tamil people for the cause of Tamil Eelam.

     

    After the 2002 Ceasefire began, the rally was repeated not only in Jaffna, but as a series of events to bring the Tamil people together in a common act of peaceful political agitation in support of the Eelam cause.

     

    In 2003 and again in 2005, Ponku Thamil rallies took place in all the major Tamil population centres in Northeast Sri Lanka and across the Diaspora.

     

    This year’s series began with a rally in New Zealand; Tamils gathered at Potters Park in Auckland for two hours on Saturday between 1:30 and 3:30 p.m.

     

    More than 350 Tamils of the 400 Tamil families in Auckland, wearing T-shirts marking the traditional Tamil homeland and carrying the portrait of Velupillai Pirapaharan, the leader of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), called for the recognition of Eelam Tamils Right to Self-determination and marked the upsurge event with cultural programmes and speeches.

     

    Maire Leadbeater of Indonesia Human Rights Committee, a former East Timor solidarity activist addressed the audience.

     

    Mrs. Narmatha, a former lecturer at the University of Jaffna, who witnessed the emergence of the first Pongku Thamil rally in Jaffna and a representative of Pax Christi International also spoke at the event.

     

    On Saturday Diaspora Tamils in Norway and Denmark also marked Pongku Thamil on Saturday.

     

    In Oslo, around 3,000 Tamils attended a Pongku Thamil event that lasted for more than 4 hours. Trond Jensrud, a ruling Labour Party (AP) politician of the Oslo Municipal Council addressed the event.

     

    Sam Jared, representing an Eritrean organisation in Oslo, in his speech compared the similarities between the cause of the Eritreans and Tamils, and stated that the victory of Tamils is a logical conclusion as their struggle is based on the principle of the right of self-determination.

     

    On Sunday Diaspora Tamils in Northern Italy gathered at Piazza Argentina in Milan, one of the largest cities in Italy, from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., and voiced their support for an independent Eelam.

     

    Burani Vainer, a renown lawyer in Italy for his legal defence of freedom struggles, addressed the audience as a chief guest, on the principles of the right to self determination.

     

    Tamil poet Arivumathi, the other chief guest from Tamil Nadu, India, also addressed the audience.

     

    The organisers of the rally said that although only a few hundreds Tamils reside in metropolitan area of Milan, nearly 500 Tamils gathered in the city where only 30 Tamils families live. Many participants had come from remote areas of Northern Italy to take part.

     

    Meanwhile, around thirty Sinhalese arrived at the site and mobilised a counter-protest. Around 50,000 Sinhalese expatriates live in Northern Italy.

     

    On Wednesday, over eight thousand Tamils gathered in Paris to express their support for Tamil independence. For days before the rally, the streets of the La Chapelle area in Paris, where many Tamils live had been decorated with red and yellow balloons – the Tamil national colours.

     

    Tamils in South Africa, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Australia, Switzerland, UK, France, Sweden, Canada and Malaysia are also expected to hold their own rallies in the coming days.

  • Remember Quebec? The Tamils are no different

    Dear Hon. Stockwell Day:

     

    I read your latest announcement about 'Terrorism" and the ban on the World Tamil Movement, a 20 years old cultural organization on Monday.

     

    I am surprised to see that the Tories are bringing Canada to what feels like dictatorship. While US Democratic candidates Mr. Obama and Ms. Clinton are showing maturity and expressing a willingness to reconsider their "list of terrorists", you are encouraging state terrorism and rewarding human right violations.

     

    After the Tories banned the LTTE in 2006, Sri Lankan government waged war against Tamils and killed more than 5000 Eelam Tamils. Now, the Sri Lankan government may plan to execute more massacres with newly pledged financial support from Iran.

     

    In Sri Lanka, the problem is state terrorism and the Sri Lankan government is killings Tamils in much larger numbers than the civilians you mention in your public statements. Please ask the UN or ask HRW for reports.

     

    Please remember you used the same HRW reports to support your decison to ban the LTTE in 2006. Why don't you use their recent reports to ban the Sri Lankan government and close their terror funding embassy in Ottawa?

     

    In fact, in the reverse, several Canadian UN officials, notably UNHCHR Louise Arbour, have been branded as 'terrorists' by the Sri Lankan government.

     

    Tamils democratically decided to free themselves from Sri Lanka in 1977, long before the LTTE came into the picture. The problem is similar to Kosovo, Tibet, or Bangladesh where a separation is needed to solve the problem.

     

    Tamils were waited for help from International community more than 30 years until 1977, then they decided to go separate and started to fight against Sri Lankan state terrorism.

     

    In Canada, Tamils are a successful hardworking community with many thousands of doctors, professors, engineers, business leaders and other skilled professionals. It is true that many Tamils came to Canada as refugees, but they immediately started to contribute to the Canadian economy and very quickly joined with the Canadian mainstream, including in politics.

     

    It is very hard to believe such a educated community could be threatened by the LTTE for money. Even if that is the case, I believe the Canadian police and the RCMP are capable of handling the situation with available laws.

     

    In fact, there are many Tamils who have worked for the police, army, and the RCMP as well. Please recruit more Tamils to the police if you want to know more about what is happening in the community.

     

    Branding Tamil organizations as terrorists, shutting down public voices or threating the Tamil community will not help in any way. In fact, it will be counter productive.

     

    On the other side, those who really want to help Tamils back on the island, will do so underground. Is this what the Tories want to achieve?

     

    In the 1980s, Canada faced the similar scenario as what is happening in Sri Lanka in Quebec, but a civilized and mature Canadian leadership very peacefully resolved the issues and provided adequate powers to Quebec. If Canada had banned the Bloc Quebec, the situation may be similar to Sri Lanka. It is always better to learn from history.

     

    Tamils know how the Sri Lankan government has denied their rights using anti-terror laws. It was the US who armed the Taliban, and it was the US who armed Iraq. Now, it is the US and Canada who help Sri Lankan state terrorists.

     

    Dictatorship or governance using fear will cause more problems. Please don't play political games at the expense of a young fast-growing, productive, law-abiding community.

     

    I believe Canada still honors freedom of speech. Please don't apply any criminal charges to me for directly writing to you.

     

    (Edited)

Subscribe to Diaspora