Sri Lankan parliament scrambles leaders as threat of ICC looms

A Sri Lankan parliament panel has “summoned” representatives from the Foreign Ministry, Defence Ministry, chief of all three forces, and attorney general, over fears the country may be taken to the International Criminal Court (ICC) or International Court of Justice (ICJ) over its massacre of the Tamil people in 2009.

Sarath Weerasekera, a legislator and retired Navy Admiral as well as the Chairman of the Sectoral Oversight Committee on National Security, reportedly summoned the officials for a Parliamentary committee citing the threat of Sri Lanka troops being brought before international courts over the mass atrocities.

“Our military officers when travelling out of Sri Lanka could be arrested and produced before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and International Criminal Court (ICC),” he told reporters. “We have that threat now.”

The summoning of senior officials comes as key figures in Britain’s Labour Party reiterated the importance of Sri Lankan being referred to the ICC. The call for international accountability has been demanded by Tamils for years, and is amongst the key recommendations that have formed the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights' report.

Weerasekera also spoke on resolutions that have been passed at United Nations Human Rights Council, the most recent of which mandates an evidence gathering mechanism “to support relevant judicial and other proceedings, including in Member States, with competent jurisdiction”.

“Though our government and Foreign Ministry had rejected this mechanism, this process is now on. According to this mechanism, legal cases can be filed in different countries under international jurisdictions against the military leaders and those officials who gave orders to the military,” he said. “This will impact the army's morale and threaten the country’s national security.”

Weerasekera went on to reiterate his government’s rejection of such a mechanism and of the UN resolutions.

He also went on to claim that travel bans imposed on suspected Sri Lanka war criminals were “a violation of the Geneva act,” though it is unclear which act he was referring to.

Last year, in a similar fashion, Weerasekera vowed to ward off international pressure by submitting a report detailing the “real state of affairs.” 

When Weerasekera was the Minister of Public Security, he criticised the UN Human Rights Council sessions, claiming the body was being used by the Tamil diaspora and Western states to weaken Sri Lanka. 

More than 167,000 Tamils remain unaccounted for after Sri Lanka’s military offensive concluded in 2009. The campaign, which saw repeated bombing of hospitals and safe zones, is being increasingly recognised as a genocide.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.

Restricted HTML

  • You can align images (data-align="center"), but also videos, blockquotes, and so on.
  • You can caption images (data-caption="Text"), but also videos, blockquotes, and so on.
  • Global and entity tokens are replaced with their values. Browse available tokens.
  • You can embed media items (using the <drupal-media> tag).

We need your support

Sri Lanka is one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a journalist. Tamil journalists are particularly at threat, with at least 41 media workers known to have been killed by the Sri Lankan state or its paramilitaries during and after the armed conflict.

Despite the risks, our team on the ground remain committed to providing detailed and accurate reporting of developments in the Tamil homeland, across the island and around the world, as well as providing expert analysis and insight from the Tamil point of view

We need your support in keeping our journalism going. Support our work today.

link button