Diaspora

Taxonomy Color
red
  • Lack of antibiotics force doctors to re-amputate patients in Vanni

    The medical care system Vanni is on the verge of complete collapse and the doctors are in deep despair due to lack of lifesaving medicines and necessary equipment required treat patients, according to the Regional Director of Health Services (RDHS) in Mullaiththeevu district.
     
    Full text of the letter, dated 15 February, 2009, follows:

    Secretary
    Ministry of Health
    Suwasiripaya
    Colombo

    Dear Sir,

    Situation Report for the current week

    I am in deep despair, much same as my colleagues with me, while starting to write this letter as we have been cursed to witness yet another pathetic scene of scores of dead and injured brought to the Puthumaththalan Hospital following shelling attack at Ampalavanpokkananai, the adjoining village situated well within the new safety area. We are confused and clueless on how to confront this situation of mass causalities with bare minimum facilities available.

    Our health care system is on the verge of complete collapse with the abandoning of all the rest of temporary hospitals functioning at Udaiyarkaddu, Suthanthirapuram and Thevipuram, leaving Puthumaththalan as the only operational health facility. Being a small school building transformed into a primary surgical care unit, there is little space and poor infrastructure, hardly sufficient to provide even basic standards in emergency surgical care to the large influx of war wounded daily more than a hundred on average – sometimes as high as 200.

    Though we are working round the clock despite being physically and mentally exhausted, lack of lifesaving medicines required for surgical operations and post operative management-parenteral high potency antibiotics, anesthetics esp. Ketamine, intravenous fluids, surgical consumables and accessories – and on top of all, absence of an aseptic operation theatre, seriously affecting the outcome in many cases. We were in total frustration when we had to re-amputate the limbs at higher levels in days after initial lifesaving amputations, just because of lack of IV penicillin and other antibiotics essential to prevent fatal sepsis. If we are not going to receive at least IV antibiotics, anesthetics and surgical consumables in minimum amounts ASAP, we may not be able to provide even emergency first aid to the war wounded. Therefore, it is mandatory to maintain a stable and safe transportation service, via land or sea route, to transfer the war wounded and of course other acutely ill medical patients including obstetric and paediatric emergencies, in order to reduce high mortality and morbidity rates.

    I have to mention with pain that we have recorded at least 04 child deaths due to diarrhoeal diseases and death of 02 elders due to acute respiratory distress during this week indicating the high vulnerability of the IDPs living under most tragic conditions with out any basic amenities or adequate healthcare support. The safety area declared during this week compression of a narrow strip of coastal land approximately 10 sq km, with thick resident population now, with the additional 2 lakh IDPs taking refugee in the area, drinking Water and dispose refill we going to be problems. The preventive health services have been inadequate: The ante natal and well baby clinics are really held; EPI vaccination program’s got disturbed due to inability to maintain the vital cold chain; water and sanitation facilities are hardly sufficient and poorly supervised; acute and chronic malnutrition are very much likely soon as unemployment and starvation are the rules of time. If this situation continues further, control of communicable disease, especially water borne, may become impossible and could thus cause havoc.

    Therefore we as medical officers remain here to rescue our own people from disaster despite the risks, would like to urge you to use your good offices to support and strengthen us to deliver our noble services with dedication.

    Thanking you
    With kind regards,


    Dr.T.Varatharajan
  • Meanwhile India supplies vital drug for treating injured soldiers.
    India has agreed to supply a vital drug in short supply in Sri Lanka for post surgery treatment for the injured soldiers, according to media reports.
     
    Nimal Siripala De Silva , Sri Lankan Health Minister, told the Sri Lankan Parliament that India has agreed to supply peathadine, a vital pain killer medicine used post surgery, for the injured Sri Lankan soldiers.
     
    Responding to concern raised by Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) over the shortage of the drug in the country, Minister De Silva admitted that there was a shortage of this drug in hospitals in Anuradhapura due to problems in importing it.
     
    "Fresh stock of this medicine is due to come from India in the next few days," he said.
     
    Peathadine, is classed as a narcotic and is administered to patients post surgery as an anaesthetic. The drug requires special regulations for importing it.
  • State Security
    The people of Vanni are being savaged by the Sri Lankan state with the support of the international community. Having hemmed over 250,000 terrified Tamils into an enclave in their home district of Mullaitivu, the Sinhala military is attacking them with artillery, rockets, cluster bombs and incendiaries. Having unilaterally and arbitrarily defined what it mockingly calls a 'safe zone', President Mahinda Rajapakse’s government is confidently slaughtering the terrified civilians who fled into it. Over two thousand Tamil people, including seven hundred children, have been killed in the past two months. For months the government has maintained a blockade. Each day dozens of wounded civilians bleed to death for lack of medical supplies. Deaths from starvation have now begun.
     
    The international community is well aware of all this. UN and ICRC staff from inside the Mullaitivu enclave are providing daily briefings. So are their colleagues in Vavuniya and Colombo. The UN's satellites have accurate pictures of the refugee camps, as well as the shelling and bombing and the dying. The British government admitted in Parliament that the Colombo government is prepared to commit acts of genocide. If it so wishes, the international community could stop the carnage; it is a fiction that this impoverished, indebted island state cannot be bent to the will of the world.
     
    Yet, for all that talk in the past few years about 'Responsibility to Protect', 'international humanitarian law', 'human rights' and so on, what we are seeing is simply indifference to the slaughter of the Tamils. A myriad of Tamil protests, petitions and pleas have failed to produce a response. Much was expected when the UN sent one of its top humanitarian officials. He came, he saw, he praised the murderous regime in Colombo and then he went. Human Rights Watch report issued a shocking report on the very day Sir John Holmes - accompanied by a Sri Lankan minister and the military - toured one of the government's concentration camps in Vavuniya. It was simply ignored. The briefing he gave to the UN Security Council was devoid of criticism of the government.
     
    Instead, the international community continues to blame the Liberation Tigers. Apparently, it is the LTTE, not the Sinhala state, that is the cause of the Tamils' suffering. And instead of pressing the Sinhala state to stop its genocidal attacks, the international community is offering to evacuate the people from Mullaitivu to the concentration camps in Vavuniya and Jaffna. In the past two decades, one in four Tamils have been driven from their homes - either abroad or to squalid refugee camps in the island. The international community is content with this. Yet, the Tamils must be handed over to the Sinhala state.
     
    When the Serbian military laid siege to Sarajevo for three years, the UN ran food convoys to the Bosniak people. It did not offer to evacuate them from their homes into Serb-run camps. When the Sudanese military and militia began massacring the people of Darfur, there was no question of moving them into government-run concentration camps. Yet, apparently the Tamils must be handed over to Sinhala state.
     
    As we have argued before, the suffering being heaped on our people by the Sinhala military and the international community is for one purpose: to make us give up our demand for self-determination and submit to Sinhala hegemony. Indeed, that is why for the past three decades, the state has been able to brutalize our people with absolute impunity. At no stage has the international community intervened to protect us. Never has it stood up for us. Instead it has always praised the Sinhala ethnocracy as a democracy and lavished aid, weapons and political support.
     
    The vehemence of the international-backed onslaught against Tamil civilians is a direct consequence of the ferocity of LTTE resistance to the Sinhala military. Whilst Colombo holds forth coloured maps and pictures of the debris of war it has captured, it hides the bloody war of attrition underway inside those parts of Vanni over which the Lion flag was raised. Contrary to the hopes and expectations of the international community, the LTTE is not going to buckle this time either, despite the redoubled efforts of the Sinhala state.
     
    This is the key lesson for the Tamils: the future the international community envisages for our people - and thinks appropriate for us - is to be incarcerated in concentration camps and subject to the whim of the Sinhalese. If we wish any other future, then we must take our own steps to shape it. And unless the Tamils have the protection of our own state with our own armed forces, we will always be at risk from the Sinhala state.
  • Congress feels the heat in parliament
    The Congress led UPA government came under severe criticism from inside and outside of the Parliament, for its continued support for Sri Lanka’s war and for being indifferent to suffering of Tamils in the neighbouring island.
     
    Cutting across party lines, members in both Houses of Parliament voiced serious concern on Friday, February 13, over the spiralling death toll of Tamil civilians and India’s inaction.
     
    Raising the issue in Rajya Sabha, BJP leader S Thirunavukkarasar said
    the Sri Lankan army was killing innocent Tamils in that country and India was helping the Sri Lankan government.
     
    Accusing the Indian government of inaction, Thirunavukkarasar added nothing was being done to alleviate the suffering of people. He urged the government to take up the matter in the United Nations and work for ensuring a ceasefire.
     
    He also demanded that the Indian Government should not help the Sri Lankan government and stop military aid.

    D. Raja of CPI said a genocide was going on in the island nation and described the situation there as very disturbing.
     
    Charging that India was providing radar expertise and naval cover to the Sri Lankan army thereby giving it a tactical edge in the ongoing strife, he demanded that the government reconsider the existing policy.
     
    Accusing the UPA government of failing to safeguard the lives of Tamils in Sri Lanka, Raja said:  "India cannot treat this as an internal problem of Sri Lanka,"
     
    V. Maitreyan of AIADMK assured the government of his party's support in whatever it did to stop the war.
     
    Sharing their concern, Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs V Narayansamy said, “The President of India made it very clear about the Indian Government’s policy on Sri Lanka”.
     
    Raising the issue in Lok Sabha during zero hour, BJP member Santosh Gangwar said the government should take appropriate steps for the safety of Tamils in Sri Lanka.
     
    PMK leader Ramadoss said that it was a clear case of genocide of the Tamil population.
     
    Taking strong exception to the argument of the Indian Government, Ramadoss said "Tamilians issue in Sri Lanka is an Indian issue. We should not keep silent by saying that it is an internal matter of Sri Lanka," 
     
    Rupchand Pal (CPI-M) suggested a peaceful resolution of the issue.
  • India changes language with measured ambiguity
    India has changed its stand on Sri Lanka, no longer insisting that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) lay down arms as a pre-condition for negotiations with the Sri Lankan government for a political settlement.
     
    The subtle change in India's stand was reflected in President Pratibha Patil's address to Parliament in New Delhi on Thursday, February 11.
     
    Indian President Prathiba Patil in her address to the joint sitting of Indian Parliament declared that India continued to support a negotiated political settlement in Sri Lanka within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all the communities, including the Tamil community.
     
    Ms. Prathiba Patil urged Colombo and the Tigers to return to negotiating table, seen as another change of stance.

    Addressing the members of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, Ms. Pratibha Devisingh Patil said:

    "We are concerned at the plight of civilians internally displaced in Sri Lanka on account of escalation of the military conflict. We continue to support a negotiated political settlement in Sri Lanka within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all the communities, including the Tamil community. I would appeal to the Government of Sri Lanka and to the LTTE to return to the negotiating table. This can be achieved if, simultaneously, the Government of Sri Lanka suspends its military operations and the LTTE declares its willingness to lay down arms and to begin talks with the government."

    The address of the President of India in the joint session of the Parliament is a declared official position of the Government of India (GoI).

    Even though the relevant part of the declaration began saying "we continue to support," the nuances of Indian position have changed significantly.

    Instead of silently allowing the continuation of war, the GoI has asked the Parties to return to the negotiating table.

    India has also taken a position that the LTTE is a partner in the negotiations.

    GoI now requests both parties to act simultaneously: Colombo to suspend military operations and the Tigers to declare its willingness to lay down arms, which allows room for both parties to actually end the war only after reaching a mutually accepted position in the political negotiations.

    Laying down arms is specifically understood as surrender in the usage of English language (The Concise Oxford Dictionary). But, "declare its willingness" provides space for conditional engagement.

    The statement 'within the framework of an undivided Sri Lanka acceptable to all communities, including the Tamil community,' is ambiguous and could mean acceptance coming from the Tamil people is a precondition for an undivided Sri Lanka.

    However, in the wake of Colombo's rejection of the British attempt to appoint a Special Envoy to Sri Lanka to help seek a political solution, it remains to be seen how Colombo will respond to the changed nuances in the stance of the Indian government.

    PTI reported members of PMK and MDMK, wearing black shirts, rose at one point during her 80-minute long speech and shouted: 'Your Highness, please stop the war in Sri Lanka'.
  • US imposes sanctions on Tamil charity
    The United States Treasury imposed sanctions on a Tamil foundation in Maryland, accusing it of being part of a support network for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
     
    In recent weeks thousands of American Tamils have participated in protests across the United States denouncing the killing of Tamil civilians by Sri Lankan forces and demanding an immediate ceasefire.
     
    Tamil political observers see the US government’s move as being aimed at frightening the Tamil Diaspora and curbing their political activities.
     
    The sanctions against the Tamil Foundation, which Treasury said was a front for the Sri Lanka-based Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, allows the U.S. government to freeze assets the foundation may have in the United States and prohibits U.S. banks and consumers from conducting business deals with it.
     
    "The LTTE, like other terrorist groups, has relied on so-called charities to raise funds and advance its violent aims," said Adam Szubin, director of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
     
    The head of the Tamil Foundation is also president of the Tamils Rehabilitation Organization in the United States, which was named in 2007 as a terrorist support group under a White House executive order.
     
    Over the course of many years, the Tamil Foundation and TRO have co-mingled funds and carried out coordinated financial actions, Treasury said. Additional information links the Tamil Foundation to the TRO through a matching gift program, the department said.
     
    In the US, TRO has raised funds for the LTTE through a network of individual representatives the organisation is the preferred means for sending funds from the US to the LTTE in Sri Lanka, the department claimed.
     
    The US Department of State designated the LTTE a Foreign Terrorist Organisation on October 8, 1997 and named it an SDGT on November 2, 2001.
  • UN avoids calls for ceasefire
    After not taking up the violence in Sri Lanka in Security Council briefings and avoiding calls for a ceasefire in Sri Lanka, the United Nations on called for a halt to ‘indiscriminate fighting’.
     
    “We are outraged by the unnecessary loss of hundreds of lives and the continued suffering of innocent people inside the LTTE-controlled areas,” Ron Redmond a spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, said on Tuesday February 10.
     
    “We are calling on both the government and the LTTE to halt indiscriminate fighting” near civilians said Redmond.
     
    Earlier, during a media briefing when Inner City Press asked why United Nations General Secretary Ban Ki-Moon, had not called for a ceasefire in the south Asian island he responded by saying Sri Lanka is not on the agenda of the Security Council, and therefore he cannot call for a ceasefire.
     
    However, this month's Security Council president Yukio Takasu dismissed Ban Ki-Moons argument, stating "the Secretary General has very important responsibility granted in the Charter, he can draw the attention of the international community to any issue that matters to peace and security."
     
    In his lengthy response to Inner Cirty Press, Ban Ki-Moon also said that "respect for the sovereignty of member states is another principle" he makes his decisions by, clearly indicating that Sri Lanka not being in the agenda is not the real reason for UN not calling for a ceasefire.
  • Sri Lanka rejects British envoy, warns of "major repercussions"
    Sri Lanka reacted with fury over Britain’s appointment of a special envoy to the country, labelling the appointment as ‘tantamount to an intrusion into Sri Lanka's internal affairs’ and warning of ‘major repercussions’ for relations with Britain.
     
    Sri Lanka’s reaction followed Downing Street’s announcement of former defence scretary Des Browne as Britain’s special envoy to Sri Lanka to focus on "the immediate humanitarian situation in northern Sri Lanka and the government of Sri Lanka's work to set out a political solution to bring about a lasting end to the conflict".
     
    "As special envoy, he will work closely with the Sri Lankan government, leaders from all communities in Sri Lanka, international agencies and the wider international community." a statement released by Downing Street on Thursday, February 12, said.
     
    Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama reacted to the British move by calling it "a disrespectful intrusion" and vented his fury saying Des Browne's appointment wouldn't be accepted by Colombo.
     
    "It is tantamount to an intrusion into Sri Lanka's internal affairs and is disrespectful to the country's statehood," the minister said, warning "there could be major repercussions" for relations with the UK.
     
    An embarrassed British Foreign Office however fought off objections from Sri Lanka stating that the appointment of Des Browne wasn't made unilaterally and insisted discussions with the Sri Lankan were ongoing.
     
    "The Foreign Secretary (David Miliband) spoke this morning to the Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama," a Foreign Office spokesman said.
     
    "He explained the reasons the United Kingdom was proposing a special envoy and that this was not a unilateral decision.”
     
    But the Sri Lankan foreign minister Rohitha Bogollagama rejected claims of ongoing discussions saying "There is no further discussion with London on the matter."
     
    Des Browne's new job has also brought criticism from the political opposition in Britain, reported the BBC.
     
    Speaking for the Conservatives, Liam Fox, said it was a further example of Gordon Brown's incompetence as prime minister.
     
    "Having presided over calamitous damage to our economy," said Mr Fox told the BBC, "he is now making a complete mess of relations with friendly countries overseas."
     
    The Liberal Democrats criticised Gordon Brown for not taking tougher action on Sri Lanka, by seeking a ceasefire in through diplomatic channels at the United Nations, reported the BBC.
     
    The stand-off comes amid mounting tension between Sri Lanka and the international community over the impact of the government's war against the LTTE.
     
    Anxious to win its decades-long conflict against the LTTE in the northeast of the country, the Sri Lankan state has brushed aside concerns over the humanitarian impact of its escalating battles. 
  • LTTE welcomes appointment of British Special Envoy
    Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) welcomed the appointment of Des Browne as Special Envoy to Sri Lanka by the British Prime Minister on Thursday, February 12.
     
    In a letter addressed to Des Browne, LTTE's Head of International Diplomatic Relations S. Pathmanathan said the British government had a moral responsibility to intervene to stop the genocide being committed by the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) on Tamil civilians in the island of Sri Lanka.

    The LTTE remained committed to a peaceful solution to the conflict and honoured the February 2002 peace pact, the letter addressed to Browne further added.

    Britain named a special envoy to Sri Lanka to help bring about a political solution to the island’s long-running conflict and to ease hardships to Tamil civilians trapped in the Vanni war zone.

    Pathmanathan, a senior leader of the LTTE is working abroad with required mandate from the LTTE leadership to represent the movement in any future peace initiatives and to function as the primary point of contact for engaging with the international community.
  • Sri Lanka engaged in systematic genocide - LTTE
     
    The Tamil homeland is witnessing one of the worst human tragedies of the 21st century said the Political Division of the Liberation Tigers in a statement issued in Tamil on Wednesday, February 11.
     
    More than one-thousand civilians have been killed and four-thousand are struggling to recover from the injuries amid continuous artillery barrage, air attacks and cluster bombing by the Sinhala state, the LTTE statement said.
     
    The LTTE statement categorically denied the Sri Lankan claim that a Tiger human bomb had recently attacked civilians.
     
    "We are a liberation movement. Our fighters and the people are engaged in the struggle with total dedication and sacrifice. We categorically deny the charges that we carried out the uncivilised act," the statement said adding that it was the Sri Lankan government that has used internationally banned cluster bombs to attack civilians.
     
    Several hundreds of civilians have been killed and maimed by the Sri Lankan bombardments, it said. The Tiger statement urged the International Community to be aware of the false propaganda of the Sri Lankan state.
     
    "The Sri Lankan military, after demarcating an area with pockets of land as safe zone and creating an illusion of security in the minds of people, let loose a relentless campaign of bombardment on them. The resulting carnage was witnessed by the UN and ICRC representatives," the statement said.
     
    "The Sinhala state has blocked access to media; communication links with outside world are cut off; International Non Governmental Organisations were ordered leave by Colombo; International human rights monitors are not allowed to visit our territory; Medical supplies are banned; Many civilians die every day; Even the ICRC representatives are forced to leave the area by the Sri Lankan state; People wander from place to place seeking refuge and are forced to lead a life worse than animals in the marsh and jungles of Vanni," the statement added.
     
    All the countries of the world that condemn the ongoing humanitarian tragedy, should also come forward to exert pressure on the Sri Lankan state to immediately agree on a ceasefire and engage in negotiations to resolve the conflict, said the statement of the political division of the LTTE.
     
    Meanwhile, the LTTE also denied targeting civilians.
     
    Categorically denying reports by the Sri Lankan military officials in Colombo that the Tigers had fired at the fleeing civilians in Vanni, Puthukkudiyiruppu Divisional Political Head of the LTTE, C. Ilamparithy told TamilNet the same day that Sri Lanka Army (SLA) commando teams had entered the 'safety zone' in Udaiyaarkaddu and Chuthanthirapuram and had opened fire killing civilians and causing injuries to many in their attempt to forcibly move the civilians into the hands of the SLA.
     
    "Sri Lankan military machinery, which has relentlessly killed and maimed thousands of civilians during the past four weeks, is now engaged in a propaganda drive to divert the mounting pressure on the Colombo government by the International Community," Mr. Ilamparithy charged.
     
    "Our political head has repeatedly urged the International Community to act to ensure the safety of the civilians, their access to humanitarian supplies and medical care," said the former LTTE political head of the Jaffna district.
     
    "The 'safety zone' unilaterally announced by the Colombo government has been turned to a killing field by the Sri Lankan military," he said and called on the International Community to act fast to ensure "an internationally guaranteed and protected safety zone for Vanni civilians in the very place where they live."
     
    Ilamparithy was engaged in organising refuges for civilians who were fleeing further into LTTE controlled territory in Puthukkudiyiruppu.
     
    "Colombo is committing the worst crimes of humanity, by killing and maiming hundreds of civilians every day within the 'safety zone', and by indiscriminately bombing medical installations," he said and added that by refusing to allow humanitarian supplies to thousands of people, the Rajapaksa regime was using food and medicine as weapons of war.
     
    "The people of Tamil Nadu and the diaspora Tamils, fully aware of the plight of their brethren, have been exerting pressure on the IC to act before it is too late."
     
    "As pressure is mounting on all fronts, the Colombo government has let lose vicious propaganda," he said.
     
    The International Community must ensure presence of international protection and monitoring authorities to assure the safety of the civilians, including the wounded patients and their guardians who accompany them, Ilamparithy said.
     
    "The civilians are scared of the reports of torture, harassment and separation of young members of the civilian population from their families at the internment camps of the SLA."
  • Friends protect Sri Lanka at international level
    While world powers look apparently condemning Colombo for its culture of impunity allowing armed forces and other elements to commit human rights violations, some among the very powers are engaged covertly in ensuring international impunity to Colombo's war crimes by dodging discussion on Sri Lanka in the apex international security system.
     
    During the closed-door meetings of the UN Security Council this week, when Mexico moved for briefing on Sri Lankan situation, Russia reportedly blocked it saying it was not in the agenda.
     
    Indian interests being looked after in the UN Security council by Russia is a long convention.

    Even as official reports put the daily civilian death count at 40 a day in the conflict zone, at UN, Russia's Ambassador Vitaly Churkin said "we believe the Security Council must stick to items on its agenda." and added there are "other fora" for information about the fighting in Sri Lanka.
     
    When the British Representative to the UN was asked why Sri Lanka was not in the deliberations, while Sudan was in, the answer was that the situation was entirely different in Sri Lanka where "proscribed" Tamil Tigers were long "blighting" the government and that has to be brought to an end.

    “What the UN-UK position is on that? Why hasn’t it been raised in the Security Council”, asked an Inner City Press reporter.
     
    “Well, the situation in Sri Lanka is entirely different. We do have concerns about the humanitarian situation in Sri Lanka. We have urged the government of Sri Lanka to have everything in count to bring an end to the hostilities so that humanitarian relief can be extended to the civilians.. (a word not audible).”
     
    “The Tamil Tigers are a proscribed organisation and the government of Sri Lanka has long been blighted by the activities of the Tamil Tigers. We want these to be brought to an end. And we want the people of the affected areas in Sri Lanka to be able to have full access to the humanitarian relief”, replied the British ambassador to the UN.

    The British position of sidelining the gravity of current genocidal situation faced by Tamil civilians as an internal affair, not needed to be brought to the attention of UN has caused serious concerns in Tamil circles.

    “In fact, barring the tone, mannerism and choice of words, the British ambassador to UN says exactly the same thing what Colombo’s Defence Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapakse said to BBC on Tuesday that the war in Sri Lanka is only between ‘terrorists’ and the people who fight against terrorists”, he added.

    The Colombo government’s open contempt and ridicule to international concerns about the human rights situation in the island as demonstrated in the Tuesday’s interview of Rajapakse to BBC is widely seen as arising from the international impunity enjoyed by it, thanks to the British government and many others.
  • Vanni: the "most ignored human tragedy"
    "If we had been on the government designated safety zone already, we'd probably be dead right now," she says, still fighting to hold back tears.
     
    Several hundreds of Internally Displaced People (IDPs) assembled within the "safety zone" have died in the last weeks from artillery and air strikes by Sri Lanka military.
     
    Civilian targets have been hit by hundreds of Sri Lanka Army fired artillery and motor shells.
     
    More than 300 people have died and several hundreds were injured in one day alone - 26 January.
     
    The Sri Lankan military has bombed ICRC offices, hospitals and killed paramedics, and it stands accused of shelling a house full of IDPs.
     
    For the Gaza bombardment, Israel is being condemned by the UN, the Red Cross and the Vatican, but in the Vanni, nothing is being said.
     
    Vanni health authorities said at least 900, mostly women and children, were confirmed dead in the bombardment, and more than 1500 wounded. They said the death toll could top 1,000.
     
    This is the 21st century's hidden holocaust ... a worse human tragedy than Bosnia.
     
    It was the most deadly incident in the current on going war.
     
    Unattended bodies and injured people unable to move were lying around everywhere, while the remaining doctors fled and helpless ICRC officials virtually cried at the scene from their bunkers.
     
    While hundreds of civilians are slaughtered by government forces in Vanni, India and certain Western countries, Britain and the US, for instance, are negotiating with the government to create a system that will allow them to increase their geo-political and economical activities.
     
    There is no significant shift in global public and media opinion towards the Sinhala majority state.
     
    They refuse to see the Sinhala state as one of the worst ‘failed’ states in the world, and the plight of the Tamil people as the ‘most-ignored’ human tragedy.
     
    Even the ‘international community’ and India help Sri Lanka to perpetrate the war on Tamils by ignoring government corruption, human right abuses and genocide against the Tamils.
     
    By now the LTTE is facing an enemy of greater tactical sophistication than they encountered in late 90s.
     
    Eight military divisions of the Sri Lanka Army, numbering approximately 50,000 soldiers (around 80 - 100 battalions), with the help of Indian military field commanders, are pushing towards the last bastion of the LTTE in Mullaitivu district.
     
    They said that they have already “boxed” the Liberation Tigers and around 300,000 civilians into an area of the size of 300 km2.
     
    This is due to the biggest ever offensive operation launched by the Sri Lankan armed forces called "Vanni Operation".
     
    This operation started in February 2007 and has not yet come to an end, but been dragging on for more than 25 months.
     
    Human-rights groups describe the dire conditions in the Vanni as a “humanitarian disaster”.
     
    Food-aid groups also say the violence in the region has increased to the extent that 300,000 people have fled to the small area in a single month to avoid it.
     
    They added that the lack of food and medicines has multiplied and that Sri Lanka is the most dangerous country in the world to distribute food aid in, because the government continuously imposes bans on foods and medicine and also accuses non- governmental humanitarian agencies of being LTTE supporters.
     
    The government has instructed UN and World Food Programme officials to keep away from their self-declared 'safety zone,' which has been subjected to continuous artillery barrage, denying civilians any meaningful space of refuge.
     
    300,000 Tamils are denied of even drinking water and are facing starvation.
     
    Completely abandoned by the International Community, the civilians are left to face their fate at the hands of their genocidal killers.
     
    If that is the case why are India, ‘the international community’ and countries around the Indian Ocean more concerned about Sinhala government and paying less attention to the increasing violence against Tamils?
     
    The reason is simple: most of those countries are opposed to the assumption of power by the Tamils, as they all back the Congress led Indian central government’s war on Tamils.
     
    For many, the abiding image of the past months will be the picture of Tamil children dying on the streets and their parents and relatives weeping near them, as displayed in Tamil media sources.
     
    In the mean time, Indian and international news agencies operating from Colombo publish no accounts of the mass genocide taking place in the Vanni. They continue to eulogize Colombo’s military victories, painting a picture of LTTE ‘terrorists’ using civilians as human shield.
     
    If the abettors of Colombo's war, India and especially the co-chairs, do not change their attitude, these people would face hunger and death. The situation is worse than what the world has witnessed in Congo and other countries in the Africa.
     
    However, there is no real chance of war being stop in the island, and especially in the Vanni region, without an effective measure of the international community.
     
    The European Union, the world's biggest importer of Sri Lankan goods, has not bothered to suspend its recently upgraded GSP trade agreement with Sri Lanka, while USA arms sales to Sri Lanka have increased.
     
    According to a report in the Indian daily, Thinaththanthi, India is to give dozens of tanks and other deadly weapons to Sri Lanka under a secret agreement with the Sinhala government.
     
    The Indian navy already has warships in the Palk Strait that assist the Sri Lanka Navy.  
     
    These can all be considered part of the war on Tamils, and India can be seen as playing a major role in this war.
     
    As such it can be argued that the ‘international community’ and anti-Tamil rulers in the region are determined to keep the war on track and to continue their support to the Sri Lankan government, which enjoys public support via war propaganda in south.
     
    One possible positive result of the false war on LTTE is that most Tamils will see the whole exercise as a foreign intervention designed to destroy their rights and identity, and therefore decide to unite to fight for both.
     
    In India, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s hold on power is looking increasingly vulnerable, with anti-government demonstrations taking place almost every day in Tamil Nadu.
     
    Most of the people of Tamil Nadu are opposing the Indian central government’s use of its own military in supporting these atrocities against the Eelam Tamils.
     
    But while those found supporting Eelam Tamils are arrested and punished in Tamil Nadu, anti-Tamil elements, which are opposed to the Tamils right and support the Sri Lankan government, are free to express themselves.
     
    The task of Tamils across the world is to raise an international outcry that can match the scale of Sri Lanka’s brutal assault.
     
    Sri Lanka is carrying out a war on Tamils backed by Indian central government and its loyal allies.
     
    There have already been protests and demonstrations across the world by the Tamil Diaspora, urging the international community to stop the state terror and genocide.
     
    From the international community, the Tamils are expecting two things must be done immediately: first strong action against Sri Lankan genocide and second the recognition of Eelam Tamils’ rights.
     
    In the mean time, Indian and International Medias need to undercover this mass genocide, which is most-ignored human tragedy in the world, taking place in Vanni.
  • International obligations towards the Tamil people
    In this two part series we examine, firstly the continuing failure of the United States, and its diplomatic allies, the co-chairs of the Sri Lankan Peace Process and leading European governments to comply with their obligations to the Tamil people under the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide.
     
    In the second part, we look at what ‘Genocide Resistors’ – particularly the Tamil Diaspora – can do to achieve compliance.
     
    An important milestone in 2008 was further NGO recognition of genocide by the Sinhala State (“the perpetrator”) against the Tamil people in Sri Lanka (“the target group” of the genocide).
     
    In December 2008, the Genocide Prevention Project [www.preventorprotect.org] compiled a Mass Atrocity Crimes Watch List of 33 countries where mass atrocity crimes are ongoing or civilians are at risk of mass atrocities. Eight of these 33 are Tier 1 or Red Alert countries. Sri Lanka is currently one of these eight – along with the Congo and Sudan – where genocide was ongoing or where civilians face risk of genocide and mass atrocities.
     
    The report of the Genocide Prevention Project said: “We identify eight situations of highest concern. These countries appeared on each of the five expert indices used as a basis for this report and received the highest composite score on our watch list.” Sri Lanka was one of these eight situations.
     
    The Genocide Prevention Project is a watch-list of watch-lists. It is a composite of five expert opinions and therefore is more significant than the opinion of a single group such as Genocide Watch or Minority Rights Group International.
     
    Nevertheless Genocide Watch also gives Sri Lanka the highest ranking – a ranking of 7 for genocide. According to Genocide Watch those countries at Stage 7 are currently at the mass killing stage, meaning they have active genocides, recurring genocidal massacres, or ongoing politicides.
     
    A third watchdog, The Genocide Intervention Network also tracks eight countries as “areas of concern,” defined by ongoing systematic violence targeting civilians on a massive scale as of spring 2008. The list of Genocide Intervention Network overlaps with but is different from the red alert list of the Genocide Prevention Project. This list also includes Sri Lanka.
     
    In March 2008, the Minority Rights Group (MRG) International produced a report “Peoples Under Threat” that identifies those peoples or groups that are most under threat of genocide, mass killing or other systematic violent repression in 2008.
     
    Sri Lanka ranked as number eleven on the MRG list. The MRG report uses a country and not the ethnic group as its unit of ranking.
     
    But in Sri Lanka the genocide is specifically against a single minority: the Tamils, whereas other ethnic groups such as the Sinhalese enjoy better conditions. This helped Sri Lanka’s MRG rankings relative to say Pakistan – which has more minority groups. Nevertheless Sri Lanka, back in March 2008 had the 11th worst position in the world for mass killing and systematic violence according to MRG. (Cynics would argue the MRG tailors its methodology to suit: after all genocide is about the ethnic group itself so the country as unit approach is not meaningful.)
     
    The 1948 UN Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide is possibly the single, most important international legislation for the Tamil people of Eelam.
     
    Article 1 of the UN convention on genocide states: “The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.
     
    UN member states are bound by convention law to prevent and punish genocide: the wilful failure to prevent or punish the genocide of Tamils and any collusion in such genocide is unlawful.
     
    Genocide is defined here to mean any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group and includes
    (a) Killing members of the group;
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
    It is noteworthy that it is not only the acts that are important, but also the intent behind them. UN Member nations have legal obligations to the Tamil people of Eelam arising from this convention. France ratified (i.e. was legally bound by) the convention in 1950, Germany in 1954, Canada in 1952.  This means, that Germany, France, Italy, Canada, - to name just a few - were legally obliged to prevent and punish the genocide of Tamils in the series of pogroms in 1958, 1977 and 1983. Clearly they did not do so.
    The United Kingdom ratified the convention in 1970 so it is obliged to act on genocides after 1970 – this would include the 1983 pogrom. It must be noted that the United States, which only ratified the convention in 1988 was not bound to act in the cases of any of the pogroms against the Tamils.
    There is no doubt that the pogroms were genocidal. Genocide requires primarily intent and the intent of the killings could not have been otherwise. This was the conclusion the Times (of London), a generally pro-Sri Lanka publication, came to: “"Genocide is a word that must be used with care; but how else is one to describe the impulse which guided the Sinhalese lynch-mobs this week.."( Francis Wheen, London Times,30 July 1983).
     
    In 1983 the International Commission of Jurists investigated and found “The evidence points clearly to the conclusion that the violence of the Sinhala rioters on the Tamils amounted to acts of genocide." International Commission of Jurists Review, December 1983.
    But the International community – including the UK and Europe – chose not to honour its legal obligations towards the Tamil people – a choice they continue to make 25 years later in 2009.
    The UN reacted in the same way in 1983 as they were to do 11 years later, in Rwanda in 1994: they dithered. Eventually, in August 1983, the UN passed an extremely mild resolution (Sub Commission Resolution 1983/16) calling for an investigation and expressing deep concern with 10 votes for and 8 against
    Rwanda teaches us that this is to be expected: governments are reluctant to recognise genocide precisely because this may force them to act when they would prefer not to act.
     
    US academic Samantha Power explained American behaviour in Rwanda: “Even after the reality of genocide in Rwanda had become irrefutable, when bodies were shown choking the Kagera River on the nightly news, the brute fact of the slaughter failed to influence U.S. policy except in a negative way. American officials, for a variety of reasons, shunned the use of what became known as "the g-word." They felt that using it would have obliged the United States to act, under the terms of the 1948 Genocide Convention
     
    She quotes a discussion paper by the office of the Secretary of defence: “Genocide Investigation: Language that calls for an international investigation of human rights abuses and possible violations of the genocide convention. Be Careful. Legal at State was worried about this yesterdayGenocide finding could commit [the U.S. government] to actually "do something."  
     
    11 years earlier, in July 1983 the International community’s attitude towards the genocide of the Tamils had been no different: they were more concerned with building trade relations with a newly ‘liberalised’ Sri Lanka, than with meeting their obligations under the genocide convention.
    As in 1983 in Colombo, so did they act in 1994 in Kigali. And now in 2009, history repeats itself in Sri Lanka.
     
    The acts of the Sri Lankan State and its allies are clearly a continuum of genocide – they are a series of acts intended to bring about the ultimate physical destruction of the Tamil people.
     
    As just one example, given, that the burning of the Library of Jaffna, was part of a systematic genocidal campaign, calculated to bring about the destruction of the Tamil people in whole or in part, by means of destroying their sense of identity, history and language.
     
    The United Kingdom is obliged to punish it; as is almost all of Europe, Canada and Australia. The Tamil Diaspora may insist that they fulfil this obligation.
     
    The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutor general’s indictment of President Al Bashir of Sudan is instructive – because almost all of the criteria cited apply equally to the Sri Lankan state’s treatment of Tamils.
     
    Firstly there is a focus on intent. The UN prosecutor said of the Sudanese President: “His motives were largely political. His alibi was a ‘counterinsurgency.’ His intent was genocide”. These words apply equally to current Sri Lankan President Rajapakse – and indeed past presidents and prime ministers.
     
    “For over 5 years, armed forces and the Militia/Janjaweed, on Al Bashir’s orders, have attacked and destroyed villages. They then pursued the survivors in the desert. Those who reached the camps for the displaced people were subjected to conditions calculated to bring about their destruction.”
     
    “Al Bashir organized the destitution, insecurity and harassment of the survivors. He did not need bullets. He used other weapons: rapes, hunger, and fear. As efficient, but silent,” said the Prosecutor.
     
    Whereas 35,000 people have died directly in Sudan, over 100,000 Tamils have died in Eelam. Both Sudan and Eelam have in excess of a million refugees.
     
    In the recent fighting, a further 250,000 Tamil civilians, in addition to the hundreds of thousands of long term internal refugees, have been displaced by indiscriminate aerial and ground attacks by government forces.
     
    The conditions imposed on Tamil refugees – the blockade of food and medicine, the deliberate killing of livestock that are essential sources of food, rape, lack of shelter, arbitrary detention and arrest, imprisoning fleeing refugees in military camps - are calculated to being about their physical destruction. .
     
    In Sri Lanka, the recent deliberate bombing of civilian hospitals and the deliberate, continuous bombing and shelling of designated civilian safe havens, takes genocide to a different dimension from that of Sudan.
     
    Of Sudan’s Al Bashir, the ICC Prosecutor General said “He did not need to use bullets”. But in Sri Lanka, cluster bombs are used against civilian refugees who are seeking safe haven from the war. And medicine is denied the survivors.
     
    Today’s Sri Lankan actions are merely a shameless escalation of a structural genocide enacted over decades.
     
    The closure of all transport (sea, road, rail) to the Jaffna peninsula now and pre-ceasefire, the embargo on food and medical items through the 1990s, the denial of Tsunami aid to the affected Tamils of the North East in 2005, were all acts designed to deprive the population of the essentials of life, including food and medicine, with the intent to create physical conditions calculated to destroy in whole or in part a people.
     
    The systematic destruction of Tamil media (the witnesses) was a deliberate precursor to physical genocide – it was hence an act intended to bring about the physical destruction in whole or part of the Tamil people.
     
    Raphael Lemkin, the Polish Jewish holocaust scholar who invented the term explains:
    “generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves”.
     
    Lemkin’s definition is one of the most powerful for the Tamils – for Lemkin intimately understood the different varieties and specific methods of genocide.
     
    By contrast, Ambassador Jurgen Weerth of Germany spoke out for the rights of journalists at the funeral of Lasantha Wickrematunge and while he mourns one (Sinhala) journalist, he continues to refuse to recognise the wholesale, systematic destruction of Tamil media as a component of genocide.
     
    The destruction of other political, social cultural institutions, the killing of parliamentarians and aid workers is often a deliberate precursor to physical genocide.
     
    Lemkin understood this well because the Nazis used similar methods in his country – deliberately targeting Polish Jewish academics and civil society leaders, for example, prior to the ghettoising and ultimate physical killing of the wider population of Polish Jews.
     
    UN member states are legally obliged to prevent and punish these acts of genocide. Germany, Japan, Britain and the United States – to name some of the active players in the Colombo diplomatic scene and in the “internationally sponsored” peace process - have no special exemption from these obligations.
     
    This means also that the UN member states are legally obliged to support organisations such as the Tamil Rehabilitation Organisation (TRO) – not to freeze their funds (collusion in genocide) but on the contrary to provide them with funds (prevention of genocide).   
     
    They may not gloat about the freezing of funds of the TRO as, for example, US Ambassador Blake did in his New Years day 2009 interview with the Daily Mirror. 
     
    At the time of his remarks Ambassador Blake, among others, knew full well that the UN has been forced to withdraw from the Vanni, that INGOs such as Action Contre Le Faim have been intimidated into withdrawing from the country and that the TRO is one of the few aid remaining agencies to work effectively in the North. He is completely aware that aerial bombing of livestock is part of this strategy of destroying existing food supplies of the Vanni, while preventing aid from reaching the area. Blockading food and aid from a civilian population is an essential part of genocide.
     
    But as with a number of other diplomats, Ambassador Blake continues to pretend that this is not an ethnic war, a genocide.
     
    It is insufficient for French group Action Contre Le Faim to say it will seek to have the murder of the 17 Tamil aid workers tried as a war crime.
     
    It is more than a “war crime”, it genocide because of the strategic intent behind it – the aid workers were killed to intimidate aid organisations into quitting the area, and thus bring about conditions which would lead to the physical destruction of the internally displaced Tamil people.
     
    In summary: the Tamils are subject to structural genocide by the Sinhala State. The UN member states have a legal obligation to prevent and punish genocide but have preferred to remain silent.
     
    Yet any collusion in genocide is a crime under international law and deliberate refusal to acknowledge genocide is itself collusion in genocide.
     
    Historians such as Linda Melvern have considered that the US and British obstruction of timely UN recognition of genocide in Rwanda constituted collusion. The present government of Rwanda has accused France of collusion in the genocide of 1994.
     
    It is extremely likely that almost all the Western embassies in Colombo, as well as the Indian Ambassador know that genocide is going on against Tamils in Sri Lanka. But they choose to deny it.
     
    The Genocide Prevention Project points out that government silence on genocide is to be expected: “Countries experiencing rampant human rights abuses are known to government officials, country experts, and political scientists. Governments and international political institutions compile private “watch lists” of such countries. These official bodies, however, do not publicize their lists. Beyond the inherent difficulty of constructing a list, “naming names” creates economic and political risks, both for those labeled as perpetrators and for governments that bestow the labels.”
     
    In conclusion – not only is Tamil genocide ongoing, all governments know it but refuse to acknowledge it. This deliberate refusal goes to collusion.
     
    It is left to the Tamil Diaspora and the people of Tamil Nadu to prevent collusion. We address this in part two of our series.
  • Beginning of a new terror in Sri Lanka
    Shortly after Sri Lanka’s 61st independence day celebrations on February 4 and his rousing speech on the occasion, President Mahinda Rajapakse was photographed intently watching a snake-charmer at an exhibition in Colombo. In the north-east of the country, his men in battle fatigues are doing the work of the snake-charmer, but with a minor difference. Their deadly opponents are not being incarcerated, but are being systematically obliterated from the face of the earth. And the success of the army in that job has been so overwhelming that the Rajapakses cannot but watch with bewilderment. A much-enthused Gotabaya Rajapakse, the defence secretary and brother of the president, has even wondered aloud why no one had done this before — “crush them with numbers”.
     
    It is not as if the idea hadn’t occurred to leaders of previous dispensations. In fact, it was the persistent lure of watching the majority (Sinhalas) swamp the minority (Tamils) that has pushed Sri Lankan politics onto a rather tragic path. The numbers game may be the cause of the war in Sri Lanka, but not the reason its government is winning it now. The acquired ability of the army to best the fighters of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam at their own game of guerrilla warfare and the ruthless bombardments from the sky that make no distinction between Tiger hideouts and schools and hospitals are the two main reasons behind the success of the Rajapakse government’s military operation. The numerical advantage Gotabaya talks about remains undiminished. In the days ahead, it can be expected to play itself out in much the same fashion as it did during the days of the Bandaranaikes, J.R. Jayewardene and even Chandrika Kumaratunga, when jointly-agreed pacts were dumped to respect the majority sentiment. But before that happens, there is a minor play to be staged with the much-lauded concept of devolution of powers to the war-ravaged parts in the north and the east — an assurance for which India has fallen hook, line and sinker.
     
    Ever since the Rajapakse government’s all-out effort to exterminate the Tigers became apparent and started to be questioned because of its severity, it has held out the carrot of devolution to ward off unsolicited interventions from outside the country. An all party representative committee, minus representation from major Tamil parties as also the Opposition, was hurriedly constituted in 2006 before the military offensive started. In its interim proposal, the APRC suggested full implementation of the 13th amendment to the constitution (which followed the India-Lanka accord of 1987). This meant “maximum and effective devolution” of powers to the north and east.
    Two years later, when the nation seems to be teetering on the brink of a major breakthrough, the APRC is still in no hurry to finalize its proposals, and can only think of offering the provincial councils “a little more power” than originally planned. Without fiscal and police powers, this amounts to hardly anything.
    For the president, however, this is no worry. In his scheme of things, devolution comes last, that is, only after demilitarization, democratization and development (in that order). As he puts it, “It is useless to give them devolution when they are not ready to accept it or you can’t implement it.” Meanwhile, the basic criterion of the devolution, that was the merging of the northern and eastern provincial councils, has been done away with following their de-merger on the basis of a supreme court verdict in 2006. The government has made no appeals to the court or tried to work around the problem. For it, the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna-instigated demerger removes a major worry over the threat that a merged province would have posed to the country’s unitary structure in case the conjoined province became restive.
    So far as the administration is concerned, the problem with the Eastern council has been neatly resolved. Following the provincial council elections last year, amidst widespread allegations of foul play, the Tamil Makkal Viduthalai Puligal, a breakaway Tiger faction, has been put in power. The armed TMVP militia ensures that the writ of the central government runs here.
     
    The greatly thankful, newly appointed chief minister, Pillayan, can only hope that the government relents and grants him enough powers “to implement policies that [they] would like to for the benefit of the people” since even basic development projects are carried out by the central government.
    But then the challenge had been different in a multi-ethnic Eastern province that has a substantial Muslim presence. It is quite another for a mono-ethnic, mono-lingual province like the Northern. The threat perception from it is so severe that a major campaign is already under way to create awareness of this security threat and force the government to consider each district in it as a distinct unit of administration, and hence of devolution, instead of considering the province as a whole. The fervent hope is that the crumbs of office will effectively forestall the power-hungry leaders (and Tamils can be no exception to the rule) from throwing in their lot with the Tigers again.
     
    Threat perception. There it goes again. It is because of the threat perception that the newly liberated, and democratized Eastern province continues to be under siege. There are “mini-fortresses with earth embankments, look-out towers made of old railway sleepers and ammunition boxes, and roll after roll of razor wire”.
     
    The Northern province, given its compromised status, could look even worse when it is re-populated. With the original inhabitants killed in the crossfire or tucked away in high-security camps, where they will be sifted from suspected Tigers by the State’s ingenious methods, the threat could be minimized by bringing in settlers. And there are seemingly credible reports already that the process has started.
     
    Another threat perception that NGOs are in cahoots with the Tigers had made the government hound them out of the country. That attitude is not going to change in a hurry. This means that the millions displaced by the war will continue to be at the mercy of the Sinhala-majority government. This is probably what Rajapakse has in mind when he repeatedly assures the world that he will “personally” take care of the rehabilitation of the internally-displaced population.
     
    For the Tamil population elsewhere, especially in the capital, which will be more vulnerable to LTTE suicide attacks than ever before, the burden of proving innocence will be heavier. But this burden of proof will no longer be shouldered by Tamils alone. This is probably where the most enviable victory for Sri Lanka will turn into its worst defeat. As the country turns into a police State to quell the threat perception, each citizen will become suspect in the eyes of the administration and of his neighbour unless he can prove his nationalist credentials. The foremost criterion is to show support for the government’s war efforts. Already, the cloud of mistrust and suspicion is darkening the horizon in the urban space. The ministry of defence has reportedly asked all citizens to register online, and people no longer feel confident to talk freely on the mobile in public. The vicious killings of mediapersons, the attacks on the media, the threat of being “chased out” are evidence of the shrunken tolerance for balanced, independent opinion. Gotabaya Rajapakse has warned that the war strategy will change after the Tigers are decimated, and “intelligence” will become a crucial part of this. Another reign of terror, State-sponsored quite obviously, is in the making.
     
    Two factors will determine how extensively this terror is perpetrated — international pressure and pressure from within Sri Lanka. The last will depend on how effectively the Opposition, that is the United National Party under Ranil Wickremesinghe, shapes up its pro-freedom, pro-rights and anti-corruption agenda. But if its campaign for the forthcoming elections in the Central provinces and Wayamba is any indication, it is clearly stumped by the war propaganda. A proactive judiciary could be Sri Lanka’s saviour if it could push through the establishment of the constitutional council. The council, in which the Opposition will also sit, and which will have powers to regulate appointments in the police, judiciary and government, could curb police excesses and corruption.
     
    As for foreign powers, it is unlikely that India will manage to have a lever in the internal reorganization of Sri Lanka now that it has shown its hand. Too much meddling may be counter-productive as it will antagonize the ultranationalist Sinhala parties. What it can do is pledge assistance in relief efforts and hope it will be accepted. The Co-Chairs of Sri Lanka’s donors, the United States of America, the European Union, Japan and Norway, too, could concentrate on the post-war rehabilitation without sending out confusing signals by insisting on amnesty for all Tigers.
  • Genocide in Sri Lanka
    THE of media reporting of the grim conflict in Sri Lanka has captured popular imagination, but has overlooked the grisly Sinhalese Buddhist genocide of innocent Hindu or Christian Tamil civilians by a US dual citizen and US green card holder. The two should be investigated and prosecuted in the United States.Acting on behalf of Tamils Against Genocide, I recently delivered to US Attorney General Eric H. Holder a three-volume, 1,000 page model 12-count genocide indictment against Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Sarath Fonseka charging violations of the Genocide Accountability Act of 2007. Derived from affidavits, court documents, and contemporaneous media reporting, the indictment chronicles a grisly 61-year tale of Sinhalese Buddhists attempting to make Sri Lanka "Tamil free."
     
    Rajapaksa and Fonseka assumed their current offices in December 2005. They exercise command responsibility over Sri Lanka's mono-ethnic Sinhalese security forces. On their watch, they have attempted to physically destroy Tamils in whole or in substantial part through more than 3,800 extrajudicial killings or disappearances; the infliction of serious bodily injury on tens of thousands; the creation of punishing conditions of life, including starvation, withholding medicines and hospital care, humanitarian aid embargoes, bombing and artillery shelling of schools, hospitals, churches, temples; and the displacements of more than 1.3 million civilians into camps, which were then bombed and shelled. This degree of mayhem inflicted on the Tamil civilian population because of ethnicity or religion ranks with the atrocities in Bosnia and Kosovo that occasioned genocide indictments against Serbs by the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.
     
    During the past month, a virtual reenactment of the Bosnian Srebrenica genocide of more than 7,000 Muslims has unfolded. Sri Lanka's armed forces employed indiscriminate bombing and shelling to herd 350,000 Tamil civilians into a government-prescribed "safety zone," a euphemism for Tamil killing fields. There, more than 1,000 have been slaughtered and more than 2,500 have been injured by continued bombing and shelling.
     
    As a preliminary to the horror, roads and medical aid were blocked, and humanitarian workers and all media were expelled. During a BBC radio interview on Feb. 2, Rajapaksa declared that outside the "safety zone" nothing should "exist." Accordingly, a hospital has been repeatedly bombed, killing scores of patients. Rajapaksa further proclaimed that in Sri Lanka, any person not involved in fighting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam is a terrorist.
     
    The United States assailed and sanctioned Serbia for noncooperation in apprehending genocide defendants Slobodan Milosevic, Radovan Karadzic, and Ratko Mladic. The United States should be no less scrupulous in prosecuting suspected genocide by its own citizens or permanent residents. Further, under Article 5 of the Genocide Convention of 1948, ratified by the United States Senate in 1986, the United States is obligated to provide "effective penalties" for genocide. That imposes an obligation on signatory parties to investigate and to prosecute credible charges - a benchmark that has been satisfied by TAG's 1,000-page model 12-count indictment of Rajapaksa and Fonseka.
     
    The predictable defense of counter-terrorism will not wash. Not a single Tamil victim identified in the model indictment was involved in the war between the Government of Sri Lanka and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. The lame excuse of defeating terrorism was advanced by Sudanese President Omar Bashir to a genocide arrest warrant over Darfur issued by chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo of the International Criminal Court. The chief prosecutor retorted that although Bashir's pretense was counterterrorism, his intent was genocide.
     
    The State Department lists Sri Lanka as an investigatory target in the Office of War Crimes. The New York-based Genocide Prevention Project last December labeled Sri Lanka as a country of "highest concern." President Barack Obama has made the case for military intervention in Sudan or elsewhere to stop genocide. All the more justification for the United States to open an investigation of the voluminous and credible 12 counts of genocide against a United States citizen and permanent resident alien assembled by Tamils Against Genocide.
     
    A genocide indictment would probably deter Rajapaksa and Fonseka from their ongoing atrocities against Tamil civilians. There is no time to tarry.
     
    Bruce Fein is counsel for Tamils Against Genocide and former associate deputy attorney general under President Reagan.
Subscribe to Diaspora